Abstract
New roles for nurses are emerging as managed-care organisations continue to evolve. Many of these roles are new for nurses; others expand or redefine traditional roles in the diabetes disease management environment in integrated healthcare systems. It is important now to redefine these roles for nurses in a way which supports the organisations’s quality outcomes.
Patient education, one of the cornerstones in diabetes disease management programmes, has been an important nursing role for decades. In the diabetes disease management environment, the challenge for nurses is to provide appropriate education to the diabetes population in a way which acknowledges the continuum of care, the course of the disease and the progression of patient learning needs. Much of the outcomes research studying the effectiveness of patient education programmes is related to traditional, hospital-based programmes. Simply adapting traditional diabetes education programmes may not be sufficient to address patient education needs for the entire diabetes population within the integrated healthcare system.
Phased diabetes competency for nurses is built on the premise that both patients and nurses acquire diabetes expertise in a phased, progressive manner. This model matches the competency of nurses at each level with parallel competencies for patients with diabetes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biskupiak JE, Chodoft P, Nash DB. Disease management in managed care organizations. In: Todd WE, Nash D, editors. Disease management: a systems approach to improving patient outcomes. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing, Inc., 1997: 207–33
Zitter M. A new paradigm in health care delivery: disease management. In: Todd WE, Nash D, editors. Disease management: a systems approach to improving patient outcomes. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing, Inc., 1997: 1–25
Eichert JH, Wong H, Smith MD. The disease management development process. In: Todd WE, Nash D, editors. Disease management: a systems approach to improving patient outcomes. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing, Inc., 1997: 27–60
American Diabetes Association: Clinical practice recommendations, 1999. Diabetes Care 1999 Jan; 22 Suppl. 1
Hiss R, Greenfield S. Forum three: changes in the U.S. healthcare system that would facilitate improved care for non—insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124(Pt 2): 180–6
Ellrodt G, Cook DJ, Lee J, et al. Evidence-based disease management. JAMA 1997; 278(20): 1687–91
Coonrod BA, Betschart J. Frequency and determinants of diabetes patient education among adults in the U.S. population. Diabetes Care 1994; 17(8): 852–8
Benner PA, Tanner CA, Chesla CA, editors. Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgment and ethics. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1996
Halstead JA, Billings DM. Nursing education. In: Deloughery G, editor. Issues and trends in nursing. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998: 261
American Diabetes Association. National standards for diabetes self-management education programs and American Diabetes Association review criteria. Diabetes Care 1997; 20 Suppl. 1: 567–70
Clement S. Diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 1995; 18(8): 1204–14
Ward MD, Rieve JA. The role of case management in disease management. In: Todd WE, Nash D, editors. Disease management: a systems approach to improving patient outcomes. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing Inc., 1997: 235–59
Data on file. Kaiser Permanente Rocky Mountain Division, Denver/Boulder Market, Disease Management Department, 1997–1998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edwards, L.L. Phased Competency. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 5, 253–261 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199905050-00002
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199905050-00002