Skip to main content
Log in

Baseline Assessment of an Inner City Population Enrolled in an Asthma Disease Management Programme

Data for Continuous Programme Improvement

  • Practical Disease Management
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Disease management, a new treatment model that may improve outcomes for patients with chronic illness, emphasises the need for formal assessments often not included in traditional approaches to healthcare, such as environmental exposures, self-care skills and functional status. This article discusses the importance of these measures in designing a disease management programme for asthma and presents the results of a study of patients referred to this programme.

The objectives of the programme were to determine: (i) baseline functional status; (ii) any barriers to treatment; (iii) home exposure to patient-reported asthma triggers; and (iv) patients’ self-care skills. The proportion of referred patients who actually enrolled in the programme and, among those patients, the proportion who completed the prescribed educational component and attended the scheduled follow-up visits were also calculated. The investigators developed a structured assessment battery that included standardised measures of functioning; this battery was administered by clinical and research staff at enrolment and at 3- and 6-month follow-up.

The patients (n = 228) had significantly lower functioning compared with the Medical Outcomes Study general US population norms and for patients with chronic lung disease. 71% (n = 127) of patients endorsed 1 or more of the 3 items on a depression screen. 85.5% of patients completed the 3 educational sessions; 104 of 228 patients (45.6%) returned for the 6-month follow-up visit.

This study contributes data about the design of disease management programmes and about asthma in inner city and minority patients, which are important topics in current research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Ratner PA, et al. The effects of cognitiveperceptual factors on health promotion behavior maintenance. Nurs Res 1996; 45: 30–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleetwood J, Packa DR. Determinants of health-promotion behaviors in adults. J Cardiovasc Nurs 1991; 5: 67–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulbok PA, Baldwin JH. From preventive health behavior to health promotion: advancing a positive construct of health. ANS — Adv Nurs Sci 1992; 14: 50–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Freundenberg N, Eng E, Flay B, et al. Strengthening individual and community capacity to prevent disease and promote health: in search of relevant theories and principles. Health Educ Q 1995; 22: 290–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason JO, Koplan JP, Layde PM. The prevention and control of chronic diseases: reducing unnecessary deaths and disability: a conference report. Public Health Rep 1987; 102: 17–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Institutes of Health. Global Initiative for Asthma. Publication no. 95–365. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  7. Health Outcomes Institute. Asthma Type Specification, 1994

  8. Neuhauser D, Headrick L, Miller DM. The best asthma care: a case problem in continuous quality improvement. Am J Med Qual 1992; 7: 76–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones PK, Jones SL, Katz J. Improving compliance for asthmatic patients visiting the emergency department using a Health Belief Model intervention. J Asthma 1987; 24: 199–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tinkleman D, Flaum M, Lung CL. Take control of high cost asthma: turning patients into partners. Strategic Med 1997; 1: 42–51

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sullivan S, Elixhauser A, Buist AS, et al. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program working group report on the cost effectiveness of asthma care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154 Suppl. (3 Pt 2): 84–95

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Institutes of Health. International consensus report on diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD. Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 601–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Institutes of Health. National asthma education program: expert panel report. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda (MD): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 1991: 1–136

    Google Scholar 

  14. Health Outcomes Institute. Health status questionnaire, 1993

  15. National Institute of Mental Health. The center for epidemiological studies — depression scale. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Mental Health, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson EC, Wasson JH, Johnson DJ, et al. The Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts: brief measures for clinical practice. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Raven Publishers, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ware Jr JE. The SF-36 Health Survey. Boston (MA): Medical Outcomes Trust, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rothman ML, Revicki DA. Issues in the measurement of health status in asthma research. Med Care 1993; 31(3 Suppl.): MS82–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Richards JM, Hemstreet MP. Measures of life quality, role performance, and functional status in asthma research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149(2 Pt 2): S31–9, S40-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahard RE. The CES-D as a measure of depressive mood in the elderly Puerto Rican population. J Gerontol 1988; 43: P24–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho MJ, Moscicki EK, Narrow WE, et al. Concordance between two measures of depression in the hispanic health and nutrition examination survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1993; 28: 156–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosley, CM, Fosbury JA, Cochrane GM. The psychological factors associated with poor compliance with treatment in asthma. Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 899–904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boulet LP, Chapman KR, Green LW, et al. Asthma education. Chest 1994; 106(4 Suppl.): 184S–196S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tartasky D. Medicine use in an inner city asthmatic population. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998; 101 (4 Pt 2)

  25. Burnham MA, Wells KB, Leake B, et al. Development of a brief screening instrument for detecting depressive disorders. Med Care 1988; 16: 775–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magni G, Rossi MR, Rigatti-Luchini H, et al. Chronic abdominal pain and depression. Epidemiology findings in the United States. Hispanic health and nutrition examination survey. Pain 1992; 49: 77–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stout JW. The asthma outreach project: a promising approach to comprehensive asthma management. J Asthma 1998; 35: 119–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Butler C, Rollnick S, Stott N. The practitioner, the patient and resistance to change: recent ideas on compliance. Can Med Assoc J 1996; 154: 1357–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morris LS, Schulz RM. Medication compliance — the patient’s perspective. Clin Ther 1993; 15: 593–606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cochrane GM. Compliance and outcomes in patients with asthma. Drugs 1996; 6(52 Suppl.): 12–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones KP, Charlton IH, Middletown M, et al. Targeting asthma care in general care practice using a morbidity index. BMJ 1992; 304: 1353–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Weiss KB, Gergen PJ, Crain EF. Inner city asthma: the epidemiology of an emerging US public health concern. Chest 1992; 101(6 Suppl.): 362S–7S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McDermott MJ, Silva J, Rydman R, et al. Practice variations in treating urban minority asthmatics in Chicago. J Med Syst 1996; 20: 244–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rakowski W Persistence of public health practices over a one year period. Public Health Rep 1987; 10: 483–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose Maljanian RN, MBA.

Additional information

About the Authors: Rose Maljanian, RN, MBA is the Director of the Institute for Outcomes Research and Evaluation at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA. She has held a variety of clinical, quality and management appointments in both acute and long term care. Her current area of research focus is high volume, high risk patient populations served by an acute care based Integrated Delivery System. John Goethe, MD is the Medical Consultant for Outcomes Research and the Director of the Burlingame Center for Psychiatric Research and Education at the Institute of Living in Hartford, Connecticut. Dr Goethe is active in both clinical trial and outcomes research. He has published many articles in the mental health literature.

Scott Wolf, DO is the Medical Director of the Asthma Control and Education Program and the Director of Clinical Operations for Ambulatory Medicine at Hartford Hospital, Connecticut. Dr Wolf’s primary area of interest is disease management and public health with a current focus on the inner city asthma population.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maljanian, R., Goethe, J.W., Wolf, S.A. et al. Baseline Assessment of an Inner City Population Enrolled in an Asthma Disease Management Programme. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 5, 135–143 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199905030-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199905030-00002

Keywords

Navigation