Skip to main content
Log in

Utilisation and Expenditures in the Treatment of Patients with Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease

Prevalence and High Cost Factors

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Objective

Disease management can be described as a data-driven care process across the continuum from symptom perception through to diagnosis and treatment. In order to effectively manage this medical-care process, the practitioner must understand the epidemiology of the disease, and nature of the interaction between the disease, the patients and the healthcare system. With this framework in mind, this research provides a picture of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) prevalence, demographics, treatment utilisation patterns and costs in a managed-care environment.

Design and Setting

Because GORD is prevalent, affecting up to 10% of the US population, and has high levels of comorbidity and serious complications, even the direct costs of GORD can be significant. Medical and pharmacy claim databases from 4 health maintenance organisations (HMOs) in 1993 and 1994 were used to identify GORD patients. Total health services and drug utilisation, GORD-related medical procedures, concomitant diseases, and associated costs were tallied. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the high cost factors in GORD patients. A health service profile of patients with GORD treated in a managed care setting was also developed in this analysis.

Results

While GORD represents a relatively small percentage of managed care spending (9.9%) there was wide variation in utilisation patterns for drugs, laboratory tests and provider types. Drugs accounted for nearly 50% of the total costs of GORD treatment. In addition, comorbid conditions seemed to have a significant impact on the overall spending of GORD patients in this environment. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were predictive of high cost.

Conclusions

Variance in costs across managed care plans studied implies that the cost structures and clinical management approaches of the plans may have an impact on the treatment of GORD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spechler SJ. Epidemiology and natural history of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Digestion 1992; 51 Suppl. 1: 24–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz PO. Pathogenesis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gasteroenterol 1991; 13 Suppl. 2: S6–S15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mold JW, Reed LE, Davis AB, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in elderly patients in a primary care setting. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 965–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1448–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brunnen PL, Karmody AM, Needham CD. Severe peptic esophagitis. Gut 1969; 10: 831–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heading RC. Epidemiology of esophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989; 24 Suppl. 168: 33–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen H. The prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995; 30 Suppl.: 5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham DY, Smith JL, Patterson DJ. Why do apparently healthy people use antacid tablets? Am J Gastroenterol 1983; 78: 257–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Wu WC. Reflux esophagitis: radiographic and endoscopic correlation. Radiology 1979; 130: 583–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1974; 62: 325–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bozymski EM, Herlihy KJ, Orlando RC. Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97: 103–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoker DL, Williams JG, Leicester RG, et al. Esophagitis: a five year review. Gut 1988; 29: A1450

    Google Scholar 

  13. El-Serag HB, Sonnenberg A. Comorbid occurrence of laryngeal or pulmonary disease with esophagitis in United States military veterans. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 755–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahrilas PJ. Gastroesophegeal reflux disease. JAMA 1996; 276: 983–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garnett WR. Efficacy, safety, and cost issues in managing patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Hosp Pharm 1993; 50 Suppl. 1: S11–S18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

About the Author: Dr Tamra J. Lair is a Senior Consultant working in the area of outcomes analysis and measurement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lair, T.J., Fu, Q., Anderson, D.R. et al. Utilisation and Expenditures in the Treatment of Patients with Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 4, 325–330 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199804060-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199804060-00003

Keywords

Navigation