Skip to main content
Log in

Management of Tuberculosis

Special Considerations

  • Review Articles
  • Interventions & Outcomes
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

The treatment and prevention of tuberculosis have gained importance as the number of cases continues to increase worldwide and the ability of the disease to pass from one area to another becomes progressively greater.

Interventions used in the US to help control the disease include the identification of latently infected individuals through the use of skin testing, the use of chemoprophylaxis to prevent subsequent activation of latent disease, and the prompt identification and treatment of individuals with active disease. In other countries, the widespread use of Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccination seems to be effective in preventing some serious forms of the disease: best estimates gauge its overall effectiveness at 50% in preventing active infection. Additional studies of the efficacy of BCG or an improved vaccine are much needed.

The problems of compliance with treatment for active disease, even for short-course regimens, seem to be universal, and many experts have suggested the use of directly observed therapy. The process itself has not been rigorously studied, but there are a number of descriptive, comparative and modelling studies that seem to indicate its effectiveness. In particular, the studies including the use of lay community supervisors demonstrate possible cost effectiveness even in poorer countries. Given the scope of the problem of compliance and its impact on antibacterial resistance and transmission of infection, directly observed therapy seems to be a very reasonable approach and one that may be very cost effective from various perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snider GL. Tuberculosis then and now: a personal perspective on the last 50 years. Ann Intern Med 1997 Feb; 126 (3): 237–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis morbidity — United States, 1997. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1998 Apr; 47 (13): 253–7

  3. Hopewell PC. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, an emerging pathogen? West J Med 1996 Jan; 164: 33–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Essential components of a tuberculosis prevention and control program; and screening for tuberculosis and tuberculosis infection in high-risk populations: recommendations of the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1995 Sep; 44 (44–11): 1–34

  5. Huebner RE, Schein MF, Bass Jr JB. The tuberculin skin test. Clin Infect Dis 1993 Dec; 17: 968–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard TP, Solomon DA. Reading the tuberculin skin test: who, when, and how? Arch Intern Med 1988 Nov; 148 (11): 2457–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Prezant DJ, Kelly KJ, Karwa ML, et al. Self-assessment of tuberculin skin test reactions by New York City firefighters: reliability and cost-effectiveness in an occupational health care setting. Ann Intern Med 1996 Aug; 125 (4): 280–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouros D, Zeros G, Panaretos C, et al. Palpation vs. Pen method for the measurement of skin tuberculin reaction (Mantoux test). Chest 1991 Feb; 99 (2): 416–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouros D, Maltezakis G, Tzanakis N, et al. The role of inexperience in measuring tuberculin skin reaction (Mantoux test) by the pen or palpation technique. Respir Med 1992 May; 86 (3): 219–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pouchot J, Grasland A, Collet C, et al. Reliability of tuberculin skin test measurement. Ann Intern Med 1997 Feb; 126 (3): 210–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. American Thoracic Society. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 142: 725–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson JM, Burtt DS, Edmonds KL, et al. Delayed tuberculin reactivity in persons of indochinese origin: implications for preventive therapy. Ann Intern Med 1996 May; 124 (9): 779–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohle-Boetani JC, Miller B, Halpern M, et al. School-based screening for tuberculous infection: a cost-benefit analysis. JAMA 1995 Aug; 274 (8): 613–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schechter CB, Rose DN, Fahs MC, et al. Tuberculin screening: cost-effectiveness analysis of various testing schedules. Am J Prev Med 1990 May; 6 (3): 167–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holden M, Durbin MR, Diamond PH. Frequency of negative intermediate-strength tuberculin sensitivity in patients with active tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1971; 285: 1506–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The role of bcg vaccine in the prevention and control of tuberculosis in the United States: a joint statement by the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1996 Apr; 45 (RR-4): 1–18

  17. Rose DN, Schechter CB, Adler JJ. Interpretation of the tuberculin skin test. J Gen Intern Med 1995 Nov; 10 (11): 635–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Snider Jr DE, Caras GJ, Koplan JP. Preventive therapy with isoniazid: cost-effectiveness of different durations of therapy. JAMA 1986 Mar; 255 (12): 1579–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ad Hoc Committee of the Scientific Assembly on Microbiology, Tuberculosis, and Pulmonary Infections. Treatment of tuberculosis and tuberculosis infection in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 1995 July; 21: 9–27

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller B. Preventive therapy for tuberculosis. Med Clin North Am 1993 Nov; 77 (6): 1263–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gordin FM, Matts JP, Miller C, et al. A controlled trial of isoniazid in persons with anergy and human immunodeficiency virus infection who are at high risk for tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1997 July; 337 (5): 315–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Anergy skin testing and preventive therapy for hiv-infected persons: revised recommendations. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1997 Sep; 46 (RR-15): 1–10

  23. Kohn MR, Arden MR, Vasilakis J, et al. Directly observed preventive therapy, turning the tide against tuberculosis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996 July; 150: 727–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rose DN, Schechter CB, Fahs MC et al. Tuberculosis prevention: cost-effectiveness analysis of isoniazid chemoprophylaxis. Am J Prev Med 1988 Mar; 4 (2): 102–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarasin FP, Perrier A, Rochat T. Isoniazid preventive therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis sequelae: which patients up to which age? Tuber Lung Dis 1995 Oct; 76 (5): 394–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Salpeter SR, Sanders GD, Salpeter EE, et al. Monitored isoniazid prophylaxis for low-risk tuberculin reactors older than 35 years of age: a risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 1997 Dec; 127 (12): 1051–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Halsey NA, Coberly JS, Desormeaux J, et al. Randomised trial of isoniazid versus rifampicin and pyrazinamide for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-1 infection. Lancet 1998 Mar; 351: 786–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Whalen CC, Johnson JL, Okwera A, et al. A trial of three regimens to prevent tuberculosis in Ugandan adults infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. New Engl J Med 1997 Sept; 337 (12): 801–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bisha WR, Chaisson RE. Short-course chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis. Clin Chest Med 1997 Mar; 18 (1): 115–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brewer TF, Wilson ME, Nardell EA. BCG Immunization: review of past experience, current use, and future prospects. Curr Clin Topics in Inf Dis 1995; 15: 253–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Clemens JD, Chuong JJH, Feinstein AR. The BCG Controversy: a methodological and statistical reappraisal. JAMA 1983 May; 249 (17): 2362–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, et al. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis: meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA 1994; 271: 698–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Springett VH, Sutherland I. A re-examination of the variations in the efficacy of BCG vaccination against tuberculosis in clinical trial. Tuber Lung Dis 1994 Jun; 75 (3): 227–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brewer TF, Heymann SJ, Colditz GA, et al. Evaluation of tuberculosis control policies using computer simulation. JAMA 1996 Dec; 276 (23): 1898–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marcus AM, Rose DN, Sacks HS, et al. BCG vaccination to prevent tuberculosis in health care workers: a decision analysis. Prev Med 1997 Mar; 26 (2): 201–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nettleman MD. Use of BCG vaccine in shelters for the homeless. Chest 1993 Apr; 103 (4): 1087–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodrigues LC, Diwan VK, Wheeler JG. Protective effect of bcg against tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 1993 Dec; 22 (6): 1154–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wunsch FV, de Castilho EA, Rodrigues LC, et al. Effectiveness of BCG vaccination against tuberculous meningitis: a case-control study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Bull World Health Organ 1990; 68 (1): 69–74

    Google Scholar 

  39. Curtis HM, Leck I, Bamford FN. Incidence of childhood tuberculosis after neonatal BCG vaccination. Lancet 1984 Jan; 145–8

  40. Fryart RJ. Review of published cost-effectiveness studies on tuberculosis treatment programmes. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997 Apr; 1 (2): 101–9

    Google Scholar 

  41. Iseman MD. Directly observed treatment of tuberculosis: we can’t afford not to try it. N Engl J Med 1993 Feb; 328 (8): 576–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bayer R, Wilkinson D. Directly observed therapy for tuberculosis: history of an idea. Lancet 1995 Jun; 345: 1545–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Pablos-Mendez A, Sterling TR, Frieden TR. The relationship between delayed or incomplete treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with tuberculosis. JAMA 1996 Oct; 276 (15): 1223–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Burman WJ, Cohn DI, Rietmeijer CA, et al. Noncompliance with directly observed therapy for tuberculosis: epidemiology and effect on the outcome of treatment. Chest 1997 May; 111 (5): 1168–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Floyd K, Wilkinson D, Gilks C. Comparison of cost effectiveness of directly observed treatment (DOT) and conventionally delivered treatment for tuberculosis: experience from rural South Africa. BMJ 1997 Nov; 315: 1407–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wei SE, Slocum PC, Biais FX, et al. The effect of directly observed therapy on the rates of drug resistance and relapse in tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1994 Apr; 330 (17): 1179–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fujiwara PI, Larkin C, Frieden TR. Directly observed therapy in New York City: history, implementation, results, and challenges. Clin Chest Med 1997 Mar; 18 (1): 135–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chaulk CP, Pope DS. The Baltimore City Health Department Program of Directly Observed Therapy for Tuberculosis. Clin Chest Med 1997 Mar; 18 (1): 149–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Davidow AL, Marmor M, Alcabes P. Geographic diversity in tuberculosis trends and directly observed therapy, New York City, 1991 to 1994. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997 Nov; 156 (5): 1495–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chaulk CP, Moore-Rice K, Rizzo R, et al. Eleven years of community-based directly observed therapy for tuberculosis. JAMA 1995 Sep; 274 (12): 945–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Neher A, Breyer G, Shrestha B, et al. Directly observed intermittent short-course chemotherapy in the Kathmandu valley. Tuber Lung Dis 1996 Aug; 77 (4): 302–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Salomon N, Perlman DC, Rubenstein A, et al. Implementation of universal directly observed therapy at a New York city hospital and evaluation of an out-patient directly observed therapy program. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997 Oct; 1 (5): 397–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Approaches to improving adherence to antituberculosis therapy — South Carolina and New York 1986–1991. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1993 Feb; 42 (4): 74–5, 81

    Google Scholar 

  54. Brainard D, Hyslop Jr NE, Mera R. Long-term outcome of inpatients with tuberculosis assigned to outpatient therapy at a local clinic in New Orleans. J Investig Med 1997 Aug; 45 (6): 381–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Schluger N, Ciotoli C, Cohen D, et al. Comprehensive tuberculosis control for patients at high risk for noncompliance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995 May; 151 (5): 1486–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Volmink J, Garner P. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of strategies to promote adherence to tuberculosis treatment. BMJ 1997 Nov; 315: 1403–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wilkinson D, Floyd K, Gilks CF. Costs and cost-effectiveness of alternative tuberculosis management strategies in South Africa — implications for policy. S Afr Med J 1997 Apr; 87 (4): 451–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilkinson D, Davies GR, Connolly C. Directly observed therapy for tuberculosis in rural South Africa, 1991 through 1994. Am J Public Health 1996 Aug; 86 (8 Pt 1): 1094–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wilkinson D, Davies GR. Coping with Africa’s increasing tuberculosis burden: are community supervisors an essential component of the dot strategy? Directly observed therapy. Trop Med Int Health 1997 Jul; 2 (7): 700–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Burman WJ, Dalton CB, Cohn DL, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of directly observed therapy vs self-administered therapy for treatment of tuberculosis. Chest 1997 July; 112 (1): 63–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Moore RD, Chaulk CP, Griffiths R, et al. Cost-effectiveness of directly observed versus self-administered therapy for tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996 Oct; 154 (4 Pt 1): 1013–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kritski AL, Rodrigues de Jesus LS, Andrade MK, et al. Retreat-ment tuberculosis cases: factors associated with drug resistance and adverse outcomes. Chest 1997 May; 111 (5): 1162–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Chaulk CP, Kazandjian VA. Public Health Tuberculosis Guidelines Panel: directly observed therapy for treatment completion of pulmonary tuberculosis, consensus statement of the Public Health Tuberculosis Guidelines Panel. JAMA 1998 Mar; 279 (12): 943–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chester Choi.

Additional information

About the Author: Dr Chester Choi is currently the Associate Academic Chief of Medicine and Director of Continuing Medical Education at St Mary Medical Center, a 400 bed teaching hospital with an Internal Medicine residency affiliated with the UCLA School of Medicine. He is Professor of Medicine at UCLA and specialises in infectious diseases. He is also Consultant to the Division of Infectious Diseases at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, C. Management of Tuberculosis. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 4, 205–216 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199804040-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199804040-00003

Keywords

Navigation