Summary
Over the past few years, there has been significant speculation about the definition, purpose and value of disease management. The existence of pre-paid health plans in the US has led to experiments with different methods for more cost-effective treatment and management of chronic illness. Various disease management programmes are beginning to show results that indicate that there are multiple components involved. Successful programmes have focused on clearly defined targets for change in a few key areas, rather than attempting to account for all variables in the early stages of development. Disease management is emerging as a practical tool that applies systems and processes within and among components of care to enable measurement, management and change. This provides a mechanism for managing the complexities of long term treatment associated with chronic illness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fox PD, Fama T. Managed care and chronic illness: an overview. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2): 1–4
Sandy LG, Gibson R. Managed care and chronic care: challenges and opportunities. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2): 5–11
The Boston Consulting Group. The promise of disease management. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. 1995
Lilly and Merck in diabetes management. Scrip 1996 Jun 11
Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M, et al. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2); 12–25
Siegel D, Habel NC. The role of health care organisations in integrating care for persons with special health care needs. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(3); 1–5
Pilkington G. Managed integrated delivery systems, part III. Patient Manage 1997 Feb; 26(2); 11–4
United hits some, not all targets in’ 94 DM programs. Dis Manage News 1995 Nov 25; 1(3): 1–5
US Company has DM programmes in CHF and hypertension. Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes News: Regulatory and Healthcare News 1996 Jul 13; 70: 7
Arkansas Hospital improves inpatient asthma outcomes. Dis Manage News 1996 Apr 25: 5
Deere implements multi-part asthma disease management program. Dis Manage News 1995 Dec 25: 6–7
Anthem achieves lower medical costs from asthma DM program. Dis Manage News 1995 Dec 10; 1(4): 1–7
Health system learns from mistakes in CHF programs. Dis Manage News 1996 Jun 25: 7
Grower R, Hillegass B, Nelson F. Case management: meeting the needs of chronically ill patients in an HMO. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2); 46–57
A European Model of Disease Management. Pharm J 1996 Jun 22; 256: 869–70
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Gretchen Pilkington is a Health Care Development Manager for the 3M (NZ) Ltd in Auckland, New Zealand. Mrs Pilkington has experience in working with comprehensive healthcare organisations in the US managed care environment. She specialises in developing quality management programmes for use in integrated delivery system design. She has previously been involved in developing measures of quality and process/quality improvement through health outcomes research, and in the planning and implementation of comprehensive clinical information systems.
Mr Gregory A. Pilkington is a Senior Manager specialising in health management with Deloitte & Touche Consulting Group. Mr Pilkington maintains extensive international experience in the development and management of complex healthcare organisations. Mr Pilkington has direct experience in all business facets of care management from both a provider and a managed care standpoint. Most recently, Mr Pilkington has been involved in the development of managed integrated delivery systems.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pilkington, G., Pilkington, G. Disease Management Theory versus Practice. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 1, 121–128 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199701030-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199701030-00001