Skip to main content
Log in

Disease Management Theory versus Practice

What Lessons Can Be Learned from the US?

  • Primer
  • Published:
Disease Management & Health Outcomes

Summary

Over the past few years, there has been significant speculation about the definition, purpose and value of disease management. The existence of pre-paid health plans in the US has led to experiments with different methods for more cost-effective treatment and management of chronic illness. Various disease management programmes are beginning to show results that indicate that there are multiple components involved. Successful programmes have focused on clearly defined targets for change in a few key areas, rather than attempting to account for all variables in the early stages of development. Disease management is emerging as a practical tool that applies systems and processes within and among components of care to enable measurement, management and change. This provides a mechanism for managing the complexities of long term treatment associated with chronic illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fox PD, Fama T. Managed care and chronic illness: an overview. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2): 1–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sandy LG, Gibson R. Managed care and chronic care: challenges and opportunities. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2): 5–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The Boston Consulting Group. The promise of disease management. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lilly and Merck in diabetes management. Scrip 1996 Jun 11

  5. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M, et al. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2); 12–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siegel D, Habel NC. The role of health care organisations in integrating care for persons with special health care needs. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(3); 1–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pilkington G. Managed integrated delivery systems, part III. Patient Manage 1997 Feb; 26(2); 11–4

    Google Scholar 

  8. United hits some, not all targets in’ 94 DM programs. Dis Manage News 1995 Nov 25; 1(3): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. US Company has DM programmes in CHF and hypertension. Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes News: Regulatory and Healthcare News 1996 Jul 13; 70: 7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arkansas Hospital improves inpatient asthma outcomes. Dis Manage News 1996 Apr 25: 5

  11. Deere implements multi-part asthma disease management program. Dis Manage News 1995 Dec 25: 6–7

  12. Anthem achieves lower medical costs from asthma DM program. Dis Manage News 1995 Dec 10; 1(4): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Health system learns from mistakes in CHF programs. Dis Manage News 1996 Jun 25: 7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grower R, Hillegass B, Nelson F. Case management: meeting the needs of chronically ill patients in an HMO. Manag Care Q 1996; 4(2); 46–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A European Model of Disease Management. Pharm J 1996 Jun 22; 256: 869–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Gretchen Pilkington is a Health Care Development Manager for the 3M (NZ) Ltd in Auckland, New Zealand. Mrs Pilkington has experience in working with comprehensive healthcare organisations in the US managed care environment. She specialises in developing quality management programmes for use in integrated delivery system design. She has previously been involved in developing measures of quality and process/quality improvement through health outcomes research, and in the planning and implementation of comprehensive clinical information systems.

Mr Gregory A. Pilkington is a Senior Manager specialising in health management with Deloitte & Touche Consulting Group. Mr Pilkington maintains extensive international experience in the development and management of complex healthcare organisations. Mr Pilkington has direct experience in all business facets of care management from both a provider and a managed care standpoint. Most recently, Mr Pilkington has been involved in the development of managed integrated delivery systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pilkington, G., Pilkington, G. Disease Management Theory versus Practice. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 1, 121–128 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199701030-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199701030-00001

Keywords

Navigation