Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spotlight on Pegfilgrastim in Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia

  • Apis Spotlight
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®), the sustained-duration form of filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]), is created by the addition of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety to filgrastim. Its approved indication in the US is to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

A single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim once per chemotherapy cycle was more effective than placebo as an adjunct to moderately myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer, no less effective than daily injections of filgrastim as an adjunct to highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer, and as effective as daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy for lymphoma (predominantly non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) and acute myeloid leukemia. Pegfilgrastim has also successfully supported delivery of dose-dense chemotherapy, stem cell mobilization, and stem cell transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-myeloid or myeloid malignancies. By offering a convenient alternative to daily filgrastim, once-per-cycle administration of pegfilgrastim has the potential to simplify the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, further improve patient health-related quality of life, and reduce total treatment costs in breast cancer and NHL, and possibly other cancer settings. Pegfilgrastim should, likewise, permit simplification of G-CSF-based stem cell mobilization and transplantation procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Molineux G. The design and development of pegfilgrastim (PEG-rmetHuG-CSF, Neulasta®). Curr Pharm Des 2004; 10(11): 1235–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lord BI, Woolford LB, Molineux G. Kinetics of neutrophil production in normal and neutropenic animals during the response to filgrastim (r-metHu G-CSF) or filgrastim SD/01 (PEG-r-metHu G-CSF). Clin Cancer Res 2001 Jul; 7: 2085–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Molineux G. Pegylation: engineering improved biopharmaceuticals for oncology. Pharmacotherapy 2003 Aug; 23(8 Pt 2): 3S–8S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston E, Crawford J, Blackwell S, et al. Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2000 Jul; 18(13): 2522–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holmes FA, Jones SE, O’Shaughnessy J, et al. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2002 Jun; 13(6): 903–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J, et al. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2003 Jan; 14(1): 29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zamboni WC. Pharmacokinetics of pegfilgrastim. Pharmacotherapy 2003 Aug; 23(8 Pt 2): 9S–14S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogel CL, Wojtukiewicz MZ, Carroll RR, et al. First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(6): 1178–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S, et al. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002 Feb 1; 20(3): 727–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vose JM, Crump M, Lazarus H, et al. Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim after chemotherapy for lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2003 Feb 1; 21(3): 514–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grigg A, Solal-Celigny P, Hoskin P, et al. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2003 Sep; 44(9): 1503–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. George S, Yunus F, Case D, et al. Fixed-dose pegfilgrastim is safe and allows neutrophil recovery in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2003 Oct; 44(10): 1691–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bosi A, Szer J, Kassis J, et al. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 2 trial comparing pegfilgrastim with filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) [abstract no. 866]. Blood 2004 Nov 16; 104(11 Pt 1): 247a. Plus poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; 2004 Dec 4–7; San Diego (CA)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Siena S, Piccart MJ, Holmes FA, et al. A combined analysis of two pivotal randomized trials of a single dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle and daily filgrastim in patients with stage II-IV breast cancer. Oncol Rep 2003 May; 10(3): 715–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burstein HJ, Parker LM, Doherty J, et al. Use of the long-acting hematopoietic growth factors pegfilgrastim and darbepoetin alfa in support of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy [abstract no. 1055 plus poster]. San Antonio Breast Cancer Society Annual Meeting; 2004 Dec 8–11; San Antonio (TX)

  16. Schwartzberg LS, Tauer KT, Barry FV, et al. Dose dense chemotherapy (DDC) supported by pegfilgrastim (peg) and an erythropoietic agent (EA) in operable breast cancer [abstract no. 6035 plus poster]. San Antonio Breast Cancer Society Annual Meeting; 2004 Dec 8–11; San Antonio (TX)

  17. Pirker R, Ulsperger E, Aigner K, et al. A phase II study of pegfilgrastim to support ACE 14 chemotherapy for the treatment of subjects with small cell lung cancer (SCLC; extensive disease) [abstract no. 7216]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2004 Jun; 23: 667. Plus poster presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2004 Jun 5–8; New Orleans (LA)

  18. Lopez A, Fernandez de Sevilla A, Castaigne S, et al. Pegfilgrastim supports delivery of CHOP-R chemotherapy administered every 14 days: a randomised phase II study [abstract no. 3311]. Blood 2004 Nov 16; 104(11 Pt 1): 904a. Plus poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; 2004 Dec 4–7; San Diego (CA)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moore TD, Patel T, Segal ML, et al. A single pegfilgrastim dose per cycle supports dose-dense (ql4d) CHOP-R in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [abstract no. 2365]. Blood 2003 Nov 16; 102(11 Pt 1): 641a. Plus poster presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; 2003 Dec 6–9; San Diego (CA)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Engert A, Doehner H, Ho AD, et al. Pegfilgrastim supports delivery of BEACOPP chemotherapy administered every 14 days [abstract no. 1316]. Blood 2004 Nov 16; 104(11 Pt 1): 370–1a. Plus poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; 2004 Dec 4–7; San Diego (CA)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Younes A, Fayad L, Romaguera J, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of single administration of a fixed dose pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) in inducing neutrophil count recovery after ABVD chemotherapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma [abstract no. 4646]. Blood 2004 Nov 16; 104(11 Pt 2): 245b

    Google Scholar 

  22. Isidori A, Tani M, Bonifazi F, et al. Phase II study of a single pegfilgrastim injection as an adjunct to chemotherapy to mobilize stem cells into the peripheral blood of a pretreated lymphoma patients. Haematologica 2005; 90: 225–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Willis F, Pettengell R, Woll PJ, et al. Pegfilgrastim alone successfully mobilizes peripheral CD34+ cells in chemotherapy naive subjects with solid tumours: initial results of a phase 1–2 study [abstract no. 2687.5]. Blood 2004 Nov 16; 104(11 Pt 1): 734a. Plus poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; 2004 Dec 4–7; San Diego (CA)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steidl U, Fenk R, Brans I, et al. Successful transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 33–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jagasia M, Greer J, Kassim A, et al. Pegylated filgrastim after high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant [abstract no. 6639]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2004 Jun; 23: 590. Plus poster presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2004 Jun 5–8; New Orleans (LA)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Amgen Inc. Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim) prescribing information. 2005 Jan

  27. Kubista E, Glaspy J, Holmes FA, et al. Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2003 Feb; 3(6): 391–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Green MD, Lu ZJ. Once-per-cycle fixed-dose administration of pegfilgrastim reduced resource utilization and costs compared with daily filgrastim in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia [abstract no. PCN4]. Value Health 2002 Nov; 5: 537–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heckinger E, Lee J, Calhoun E, et al. Cost minimization analysis of figrastim versus pegfilgrastim for stage II-IV breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: assessments based on third-party and societal perspectives [abstract no. 2116]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003 May 31; 22: 526

    Google Scholar 

  30. Suzcs TD, Standaert B, Lu ZJ. Analysis on cost difference between daily filgrastim and once per cycle pegfilgrastim for prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in France and Germany. Value Health 2003 Nov; 6(6): 732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Crawford J, et al. Economic impact of pegfilgrastim use based on the risk of febrile neutropenia in NHL patients treated with CHOP [abstract no. 2384]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003 May 31; 22: 593

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eldar-Lissai A, Cosier L, Lyman GH. Economic analysis of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in cancer patients [abstract no. 2212]. Blood 2004 Nov 16; 104(11 Pt 1): 608a. Plus poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; 2004 Dec 4–7; San Diego (CA)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The full text article in American Journal of Cancer 2005; 4 (4): 255–74 was reviewed by: R.A. Beveridge, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Fairfax, Virginia, USA; P.S. Carey, Sunderland Royal Infirmary, Sunderland, England; D.C. Dale, University of Washington, Department of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; D.B. Daniel, Duke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; M.D. Green, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; E. Kubista, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and F. Willis, St. George’s Hospital, London, England.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Frampton.

Additional information

This spotlight is derived from abstract and summary text of an Adis Drug Evaluation originally published in full in American Journal of Cancer 2005; 4 (4): 255–74. Reviewers of the original full text article are listed in the Acknowledgments section

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frampton, J.E., Keating, G.M. Spotlight on Pegfilgrastim in Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia. BioDrugs 19, 405–407 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200519060-00008

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200519060-00008

Keywords

Navigation