Skip to main content
Log in

Topical Fluticasone Propionate

A Review of its Pharmacological Properties and Therapeutic Use in the Treatment of Dermatological Disorders

  • Adis Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Synopsis

Fluticasone propionate is a fluoromethyl androstane 17β-carbiothioate that is classified for dermatological use as a moderate potency corticosteroid. It is available in 0.05% cream and 0.005% ointment formulations for the treatment of patients with inflammatory dermatoses responsive to corticosteroids.

Although it demonstrates greater activity than other corticosteroids of similar potency in vasoconstrictor assays in humans, fluticasone propionate demonstrates low potential to cause significant systemic effects such as suppression of the hypothalamopituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. This is because it has a high affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor and high lipophilicity, and the small amount of drug that is absorbed is rapidly metabolised to the inactive carboxylic acid derivative in the liver (i.e. it has low systemic bioavailability).

In clinical trials, the efficacy of fluticasone propionate cream at 4 weeks did not differ significantly from that of hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% cream in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Likewise, after 4 weeks, the ointment form of fluticasone propionate had similar efficacy to betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% in patients with psoriasis or atopic dermatitis, although the latter agent may have a faster onset of activity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Fluticasone propionate ointment was generally more effective than hydrocortisone butyrate ointment in patients with psoriasis.

A sustained response was usually observed after about 1 weekś application of fluticasone propionate, and although once and twice daily administration had similar efficacy, a twice daily regimen may have a slightly faster onset of effect.

In trials which included both adults and children, the only adverse events reported were local cutaneous reactions (most frequently, pruritus).

Thus, fluticasone propionate, with its low potential for systemic toxicity and possible advantage of once daily administration, is a useful addition to the topical corticosteroids available for the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.

Pharmacological Profile

Vasoconstriction assays in humans showed that fluticasone propionate is more active than beclomethasone dipropionate, betamethasone valerate, triamcinolone acetonide and fluocinolone acetonide. However, it caused little if any significant hypothalamopituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression in studies conducted in patients and healthy volunteers.

Fluticasone propionate binds to the glucocorticoid receptor faster than several other corticosteroids and the fluticasone propionate-receptor complex dissociates more slowly. As a result, this complex (which is responsible for the therapeutic activity of corticosteroids) has a longer half-life than other corticosteroid-receptor complexes. Indeed, fluticasone propionate had a greater in vitro relative receptor affinity than 32 other corticosteroids. Importantly, fluticasone propionate is highly selective for the glucocorticoid receptor and has little or no activity at other steroid receptors.

Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream produced only 3% skin thinning compared with placebo in a study which used pulsed A-scan ultrasound to assess changes. This effect was independent of the duration of treatment (2, 4, 6 or 8 weeks) in 40 healthy volunteers and was reversed within 2 to 4 weeks of treatment discontinuation.

The commercially available formulation of fluticasone propionate cream was preferred over commercially available preparations of betamethasone valerate, hydrocortisone valerate, fluocinonide, triamcinolone acetonide and mometasone creams in terms of appearance, cosmetic acceptability and physicochemical properties in a blinded laboratory analysis.

The pharmacokinetic profile of fluticasone propionate cream or ointment in healthy volunteers or patients has not been published.

In rats, radiolabelled fluticasone propionate cream or ointment had a long retention time at the application site. After administration of a single 1 g/kg dose (removed from the skin after 24 hours), percutaneous absorption was low with only about 5% of the dose being absorbed through the skin over a 7-day period. Results of in vitro analyses using homogenates of human skin suggest that fluticasone propionate is not metabolised in the skin.

After intravenous administration to 12 healthy volunteers, fluticasone propionate 0.25 to 1mg was extensively distributed within the body and then rapidly cleared by nonsaturable metabolism. Fluticasone propionate is poorly absorbed after oral administration and is then extensively metabolised. Thus, only small amounts of the drug enter the systemic circulation via this route.

The metabolite of fluticasone propionate is a 17β-carboxylic acid derivative which has no corticosteroid activity.

Therapeutic Use

In clinical trials, fluticasone propionate was generally administered for 4 weeks as a 0.05% cream or a 0.005% ointment. All trials were multicentre, randomised and double-blind.

Fluticasone propionate, as an ointment applied twice daily or a cream applied once or twice daily, has significantly superior efficacy to vehicle in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis or psoriasis. Patients with atopic dermatitis receiving once daily fluticasone propionate used approximately half the amount of active treatment that twice daily recipients used and generally achieved a similar response. However, the twice daily regimen tended to have a faster onset of effect.

Sustained improvement is generally noted within 8 days of initiating treatment with fluticasone propionate; pruritus tends to resolve more rapidly than other symptoms.

The efficacy of fluticasone propionate cream is not significantly different from that of hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% cream in patients with atopic dermatitis: in a trial which included 119 patients, atopic dermatitis was cleared in 36% of fluticasone propionate recipients and 40% of hydrocortisone butyrate recipients at completion of treatment. An additional 39% of fluticasone propionate, and 37% of hydrocortisone butyrate, recipients achieved good or excellent improvement. Similarly, fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream was not significantly different from betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream in 2 trials which enrolled patients with psoriasis.

Although there was no significant difference in efficacy between fluticasone propionate 0.005% and betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% ointments at 4 weeks in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis or psoriasis, betamethasone dipropionate may have a faster onset of action in patients with atopic dermatitis. This formulation of fluticasone propionate was generally more effective than hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% ointment in patients with psoriasis.

Two studies, each conducted in about 100 children with atopic dermatitis, showed fluticasone propionate 0.05% to have greater efficacy than hydrocortisone 1% cream and hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% cream, respectively. The creams were applied twice daily for 2 weeks, then as required for 12 weeks.

Tolerability

Although efficacy was usually measured over 4 weeks, patients often received treatment with fluticasone propionate for 2 further 3-week periods; each treatment period was separated by an interval of 1 week, resulting in 12 weeks of study. Tolerability was assessed over the 12-week period in these trials.

Adverse events reported in patients using fluticasone propionate in clinical trials were usually local cutaneous reactions (most commonly pruritus, burning, dryness, stinging, folliculitis, irritation or exacerbation of the dermatological condition) which resolved spontaneously and affected up to 19% of patients. Overall, the most common adverse event reported during use of fluticasone propionate cream or ointment was pruritus.

The tolerability profile of fluticasone propionate cream or ointment was not significantly different from that reported for comparator topical corticosteroids or vehicle in clinical trials.

Fluticasone propionate is associated with a low incidence of systemic adverse events. Indeed, no systemic adverse effects related to application of fluticasone propionate cream or ointment were reported in clinical trials of the drug.

Hypersensitivity reactions are not common with fluticasone propionate cream or ointment; however, several trials excluded patients with a known hypersensitivity or previous reaction to corticosteroids.

Dosage and Administration

Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream or 0.005% ointment is indicated for the symptomatic relief of inflammation and pruritus in patients with corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses. It should be applied as a thin film which is gently rubbed into affected skin areas once or twice daily. Like other corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate should not be used by patients hypersensitive to corticosteroids, those with rosacea, acne, perioral dermatitis, primary cutaneous viral, bacterial or fungal infections, perianal or genital pruritus, or children aged <1 year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piacquadio DJ. Topical corticosteroids in clinical practice: focus on fluticasone propionate. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 4–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trozak DJ. Topical corticosteroid therapy in psoriasis vulgaris. Cutis 1990 Oct; 46: 341–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drugs acting on the skin. In: BNF: British National Formulary. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1996 Sep: 455–500 (no. 32 1996)

  4. Bryson HM, Faulds D. Intranasal fluticasone propionate, a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in allergic rhinitis. Drugs 1992; 43(5): 760–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuller R, Johnson M, Bye A. Fluticasone propionate — an update on preclinical and clinical experience. Respir Med 1995; 89Suppl. A: 3–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holliday SM, Faulds D, Sorkin EM. Inhaled fluticasone propionate: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in asthma. Drugs 1994 Feb; 47:318–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson M. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of inhaled glucocorticoids. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996 Jan; 97 (Pt 2): 169–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiseman LR, Benfield P. Intranasal fluticasone propionate: a reappraisal of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the treatment of rhinitis. Drugs 1997 (in press)

  9. Shaw RJ. Pharmacology of fluticasone propionate. Respir Med 1994 Aug; 88Suppl. A: 5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hopkins SJ. Fluticasone propionate. Drugs Today 1992; 28(2): 89–91

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blackwell GJ, Carnuccio R, Di Rosa M, et al. Macrocortin: a polypeptide causing the anti-phospholipase effect of glucocorticoids. Nature 1980 Sep 11; 287: 147–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammarström S, Hamberg M, Duell EA, et al. Glucocorticoid in inflammatory proliferative skin disease reduces arachidonic and hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids. Science 1977 Sep 2; 197(4307): 994–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemény L, Michel G, Dobozy A, et al. Cytokine system as potential target for antipsoriatic therapy. Exp Dermatol 1994 Feb; 3: 1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ponec M. Glucocorticoids and cultured human skin cells: specific intracellular binding and structure-activity relationships. Br J Dermatol 1982; 107Suppl. 23: 24–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Högger P, Rohdewald P. Binding kinetics of fluticasone propionate to the human glucocorticoid receptor. Steroids 1994 Oct; 59: 597–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiirthwein G, Rehder S, Rohdewald P. Lipophilicity and receptor affinity of glucocorticoids. Pharm Ztg Wiss 1992; 137(4): 161–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phillipps GH. Structure-activity relationships of topically active steroids: the selection of fluticasone propionate. Respir Med 1990 Nov; 84: 19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ventresca GP, Mackie AE, Moss JA, et al. Absorption of oral fluticasone propionate in healthy subjects [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994 Apr; 149 (Pt 2): A214

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harding SM. The human pharmacology of fluticasone propionate. Respir Med 1990 Nov; 84: 25–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Young MMR, Sohail S, Harding SM. A comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate ointment and betamethasone valerate [abstract no. P201]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1995 Oct; 5Suppl. 1: S166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Young MMR, Sohail S, Harding SM, et al. A comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate and betamethasone valerate ointments [poster]. Presented at the 4th Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV): 1995 Oct 10–15; Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tschen E, Bucko AD. Fluticasone propionate cream 0.05%: its profile of safety when used in large-scale doses on patients with extensive psoriasis or eczema, [abstract]. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; 1996 Feb 10–15; Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cornell R. Fluticasone propionate ointment 0.005%: its lack of suppression on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis when used for the treatment of psoriasis or eczema, [abstract]. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; 1996 Feb 10–15; Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Delescluse J, van der Endt JD. A comparison of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fluticasone propionate ointment, 0.005%, and betamethasone-17,21-dipropionate ointment, 0.05%, in the treatment of eczema. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 32–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts DT. Comparison of fluticasone propionate ointment, 0.005%, and betamethasone-17, 21-dipropionate ointment, 0.05%, in the treatment of psoriasis. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 27–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Juhlin L. Comparison of fluticasone propionate cream, 0.05%, and hydrocortisone- 17-butyrate cream, 0.1 %, in the treatment of eczema. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 51–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dykes PJ, Marks R, Hill S, et al. The kinetics of skin thinning induced by topical fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream in volunteer subjects. Clin Exp Dermatol 1996; 21: 180–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Black D, Marks R. Age influence on topical corticosteroid effects on skin [abstract]. Br J Dermatol 1990; 123Suppl. 37: 18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hadzija BW, Ambrose WW. Comparison of cosmetic and physicochemical properties of six topical corticosteroid creams. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 13–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee FW, Nystrom DD, Koonce W. Comparison of the percutaneous absorption of fluticasone 17-propionate from cream and ointment formulations in rats, [abstract no. PD 917]. Pharm Res 1989 Sep; 6 Suppl.: S–106

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chu AC, Munn S. Fluticasone propionate in the treatment inflammatory dermatoses. Br J Clin Pract 1995 May-Jun; 49: 131–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mackie AE, Ventresca GP, Fuller RW, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous fluticasone propionate in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996 Jun; 41: 539–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bye A. The oral systemic availability of fluticasone propionate in man -preliminary data [letter]. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993 Aug; 36: 136–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Falcoz C, Mackie AE, McDowall J, et al. Oral bioavailability of fluticasone propionate in healthy subjects [abstract]. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996 May; 41: 459–60

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shenoy EVB, Ayrton J, Bowers GD, et al. The use of Hep G2 cells in predicting the routes of metabolism of fluticasone proprionate in man [abstract]. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993 Aug; 36: 166P–7P

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lebwohl M. Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate ointment, 0.005%, in the treatment of eczema. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 62–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tharp MD. A comparison of twice-daiy and once-daily administration of fluticasone propionate cream, 0.05%, in the treatment of eczema. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 19–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bleehen SS, Chu AC, Hamann I, et al. Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream in the treatment of atopic eczema: a multicentre study comparing one-daily treatment and once-daily vehicle cream application versus twice-daily treatment. Br J Dermatol 1995 Oct; 133: 592–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Consensus report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology 1993; 186:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. van der Meer JB, Coenraads PJ, Mulder PGH, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate ointment in the acute and maintenance treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis [abstract no. OP 199]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1996; 7Suppl. 2: S107

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kennedy CTC, Helm K, Birchall NM, et al. Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream for atopic dermatitis in children (poster). Presented at the World Congress of Dermatology; 1992 Jun 12–18; New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Callen J. Comparison of safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate cream, 0.05%, and betamethasone valerate cream, 0.1%, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 45–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Olsen EA. Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 0.005% ointment in the treatment of psoriasis. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 57–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nurnberger FG. A comparison of fluticasone propionate ointment, 0.005%, and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate ointment, 0.01%, in the treatment of psoriasis. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 39–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Glaxo Wellcome. Product profile. Middlesex, England: Glaxo Wellcome, 1996. (Data on file)

  46. Johnson M. Fluticasone propionate: safety profile. Cutis 1996 Feb; 57: 10–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Quintiliani R. Hypersensitivity and adverse reactions associated with the use of newer intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1996 Jul; 57: 478–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Melamed J, Stone B, Beaucher W, et al. Anaphylaxis and flushing after the administration of intranasal fluticasone propionate [abstract no. 670]. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996 Jan; 97 (Pt 3): 350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sasaki E. Corticosteroid sensitivity and cross-sensitivity. A review of 18 cases 1967–1988. Contact Dermatitis 1990 Nov; 23: 306–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilkinson M, Hollis S, Beck M. Reactions to other corticosteroids in patients with positive patch test reactions to budeson-ide. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33(6): 963–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Venning VA. Fluticasone propionate sensitivity in a patient with contact allergy to multiple corticosteroids. Contact Dermatitis 1995 Jul; 33: 48–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wilkinson SM, Beck MH. Fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate have a low risk of contact sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1996 May; 34: 365–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Greaves MW, Weinstein GD. Treatment of psoriasis. N Engl J Med 1995 Mar 2; 332: 581–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Phillips WG, Breathnach SM. Psoriasis. Immune indicators and treatment. Clin Immunother 1994 Feb; 1: 157–67

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hsieh K-H. Atopic dermatitis: immune indicators and immunomodulatory treatment. Clin Immunother 1995 Jan; 3: 88–93

    Google Scholar 

  56. Glaxo Wellcome. An application for approval to market fluticasone propionate ointment and fluticasone propionate cream for the treatment of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses. Expert report on the clinical documentation. Middlesex, England: Glaxo Wellcome, 1996. (Data on file)

  57. Finlay AY. Quality-of-life issues and economic burden of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis: rationale for treatment. Clin Drug Invest 1995; 10Suppl. 1: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  58. Van de Kerkhof PCM. Biological activity of vitamin D analogues in the skin, with special reference to antipsoriatic mechanisms. Br J Dermatol 1995 May; 132: 675–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Moseley H, Ferguson J. Photochemotherapy: a reappraisal of its use in dermatology. Drugs 1989 Nov; 38: 822–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Dutz JP, Ho VC. Immunosuppressive agents in skin disorders: a comparative review. Clin Immunother 1996 Apr; 5: 268–93

    Google Scholar 

  61. Williams REA et al. Guidelines for management of patients with psoriasis. BMJ 1991 Oct 5; 303: 829–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bodor N. The application of soft drug approaches to the design of safer corticosteroids. In: Christophers E, et al., editors. Topical corticosteroid therapy: a novel approach to safer drugs. Raven Press Ltd: New York, 1988: 13–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline M. Spencer.

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: A.C. Chu, Dermatology Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England; G. Ciprandi, Servizio di Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy; A. Cooper, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia; J.M. Haigh, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa; L. Juhlin, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; M. Lebwohl, Department of Dermatology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; W.J.Metzger, Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Department of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA; F.G. Nürnberger, Universitäts Klinikum Rudolf Virchow, Klinik und Poliklinikum für Dermatologie, Klinische Immunologie und Asthma, Berlin, Germany; D.T. Roberts, Department of Dermatology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spencer, C.M., Wiseman, L.R. Topical Fluticasone Propionate. BioDrugs 7, 318–334 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-199707040-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-199707040-00006

Keywords

Navigation