Skip to main content
Log in

Effective Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction with Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Combination Therapy

Post Hoc Analysis of Data from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicentre Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) strongly predicts cardiovascular risk and is an important factor to evaluate in studies of anti-hypertensive treatments. A recent randomized controlled study has shown that the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) olmesartan medoxomil (hereafter olmesartan) combined with the calcium channel antagonist (calcium channel blocker) amlodipine can control SBP in a majority of patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension. The aim of this report is to present results from a post hoc analysis of this study to further evaluate the effects of this combination on SBP.

Methods: A post hoc analysis of changes in seated SBP (SeSBP) levels in patients treated with olmesartan 40 mg plus amlodipine 5 or 10 mg was carried out to investigate the distribution of SeSBP changes produced by this combination. Patients who reached the end of the 52-week study were categorized by size of SeSBP reduction from baseline as follows: ≤15 mmHg; s>15 to ≤30 mmHg; s>30 to ≤45 mmHg and s>45 mmHg.

Results: In 578 patients who received olmesartan/amlodipine 40 mg/5 mg or 40 mg/10 mg and completed the study, the mean SeSBP reduction from baseline was 31.18 mmHg, and the proportions of patients with SeSBP reductions ≤15 mmHg, >15 to ≤30 mmHg, >30 to ≤45 mmHg and >45 mmHg were 12.8%, 36.0%, 35.3% and 15.9%, respectively. In patients who received olmesartan/amlodipine 40 mg/10 mg, the proportion of patients in the ≤15 mmHg group was smaller (12.2%) and in the >45 mmHg group was larger (21.6%). Moreover, patients in the >45 mmHg category showed the greatest reduction in SeSBP from baseline (53.5 mmHg for olmesartan/amlodipine 40mg/10mg recipients). Categorical analysis of patients treated with olmesartan/amlodipine 40 mg/10 mg in a separate, factorial study showed similar results: SeSBP reductions of ≤15 mmHg; >15 to ≤30 mmHg; >30 to ≤45 mmHg and >45 mmHg were seen in 17%, 34%, 36% and 14% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Treatment with a combination based upon olmesartan 40 mg plus amlodipine 5 or 10 mg effectively reduces elevated SeSBP, particularly in patients with high levels of SeSBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002 Dec 14; 360(9349): 1903–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Schwartz MJ. Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol 1971 Apr; 27(4): 35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Staessen JA, Gasowski J, Wang JG, et al. Risks of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis of outcome trials. Lancet 2000 Mar 11; 355(9207): 865–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Franklin SS, Jacobs MJ, Wong ND, et al. Predominance of isolated systolic hypertension among middle-aged and elderly US hypertensives: analysis based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. Hypertension 2001 Mar; 37(3): 869–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Black HR. The paradigm has shifted to systolic blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18(S2): S3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawes CM, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A. Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet 2008 May 3; 371(9623): 1513–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mourad J. The evolution of systolic blood pressure as a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk and the effectiveness of fixed-dose ARB/CCB combinations in lowering levels of this preferential target. Vasc Health Risk Manage 2008; 4(6): 1315–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams B, Lindholm LH, Sever P. Systolic pressure is all that matters. Lancet 2008 Jun 28; 371(9631): 2219–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitworth JA. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003 Nov; 21(11): 1983–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003 Dec; 42(6): 1206–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007 Jun; 25(6): 1105–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins B, Williams B. Pharmacological management of hypertension. Clin Med 2007 Dec; 7(6): 612–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Volpe M, Brommer P, Haag U, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil combined with amlodipine in patients with moderate to severe hypertension after amlodipine monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study. Clin Drug Invest 2009; 29(1): 11–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chrysant SG, Melino M, Karki S, et al. The combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate in controlling high blood pressure: COACH, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week factorial efficacy and safety study. Clin Ther 2008 Apr; 30(4): 587–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Philipp T, Smith TR, Glazer R, et al. Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Clin Ther 2007; 29(4): 563–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Poldermans D, Glazes R, Kargiannis S, et al. Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension. Clin Ther 2007; 29(2): 279–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Volpe M, Miele C, Haag U. Efficacy and safety of a steppedcare regimen using olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension. Clin Drug Invest 2009; 29(6): 381–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is an analysis of a study sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany. Wolters Kluwer Health provided medical writing assistance in the preparation of this manuscript, which was funded by Daiichi Sankyo Europe. Prof. Mourad has received consulting and/or lecture fees from Daiichi-Sankyo and other companies developing antihypertensive therapies during the last 5 years. Dr Le Jeune has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr Winfried Koch of HaaPACS GmbH, Schriesheim, Germany with the analysis of data presented in this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Jacques Mourad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mourad, JJ., Jeune, S.L. Effective Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction with Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Combination Therapy. Clin. Drug Investig. 29, 419–425 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200929060-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200929060-00005

Keywords

Navigation