Skip to main content
Log in

Esomeprazole 20mg Provides More Effective Intragastric Acid Control than Maintenance-Dose Rabeprazole, Lansoprazole or Pantoprazole in Healthy Volunteers

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

A high proportion of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease experience recurrence of symptoms within a year of initial treatment. The key to preventing relapse is an effective maintenance therapy that maintains intragastric pH >4. This study was conducted to compare the effects on intragastric pH of maintenance doses of four proton pump inhibitors: esomeprazole 20mg, lansoprazole 15mg, rabeprazole 10mg and pantoprazole 20mg.

Study participants and methods

Three standardised, randomised, two-way crossover studies were performed in a total of 108 Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy subjects. Intragastric pH was monitored on day 5 of once-daily oral dosing. The percentage of time of a 24-hour period with intragastric pH >4 and 24-hour median pH were measured on day 5.

Results

The mean percentage of time with intragastric pH >4 on day 5 was significantly longer following esomeprazole 20mg compared with either lansoprazole 15mg (esomeprazole 50.4% vs lansoprazole 43.0%, p = 0.026), rabeprazole 10mg (esomeprazole 59.8% vs rabeprazole 51.7%, p = 0.011) or pantoprazole 20mg (esomeprazole 59.6% vs pantoprazole 39.5%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Maintenance dose esomeprazole 20mg provided greater acid control and maintained intragastric pH >4 for a longer period of time than maintenance dose lansoprazole 15mg, rabeprazole 10mg and pantoprazole 20mg in healthy subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunt RH. Importance of pH control in the management of GERD. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(7): 649–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olbe L, Lundell L. Medical treatment of reflux esophagitis. Hepatogastroenterology 1992; 39(4): 322–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adeno-carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(11): 825–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell NJV, Burget D, Howden CW, et al. Appropriate acid suppression for management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 1992; 51 Suppl. 1: 59–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Havelund TT, Lind T, Wiklund I, et al. Quality of life in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis: effects of treatment with omeprazole. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94(7): 1782–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Revicki DA, Wood M, Maton PN, et al. The impact of gastro-esophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Am J Med 1998; 104(3): 252–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiba N, De Gara CJ, Wilkinson JM, et al. Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 1997; 112(6): 1798–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lind T, Rydberg L, Kyleback A, et al. Esomeprazole provides improved acid control vs. omeprazole in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14(7): 861–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Röhss K, Wilder-Smith C, Claar-Nilsson C, et al. Esomeprazole 40mg provides more effective acid control than standard doses of all other proton pump inhibitors [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: A419

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miner PB, Katz PO, Chen Y, et al. Gastric acid control with esomeprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole: a five-way crossover study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2616–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2000. Guidance on the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of dyspepsia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk [Accessed 2003 Sep 12]

  12. DeVault KR, Castell DO, and The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol} 1999}; 94}: 1434–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, et al. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management: the Genval workshop report. Gut 1999; 44 Suppl. 2: Sl–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilder-Smith C, Röhss K, Claar-Nilsson C. Esomeprazole 20mg provides more effective acid control than lansoprazole 15mg [abstract]. Gut 2000; 47 Suppl. 3: A62

    Google Scholar 

  15. Röhss K, Claar-Nilsson C, Jansson L. Esomeprazole 20mg provides more effective acid control than rabeprazole 10mg following repeated drug administration. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37(6 Suppl. 235): 2–38

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nilsson-Pieschl C, Lundin C, Hjalmar K, et al. Esomeprazole 20mg provides faster and more effective acid control than pantoprazole 20mg in healthy volunteers. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38Suppl 238: A–P3

    Google Scholar 

  17. Howden CW, Burget DW, Hunt RH. Appropriate acid suppression for optimal healing of duodenal ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29 Suppl. 201: 79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomson ABR, Claar-Nilsson C, Hasselgren G, et al. Esomeprazole 40mg provides more effective acid control than lansoprazole 30mg during single and repeated administration [abstract]. Gut 2000; 47 Suppl. 3: 63

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lauritsen K, Deviere J, Bigard M-A. Esomeprazole 20mg is more effective than lansoprazole 15mg in the maintenance treatment of patients with healed reflux oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17(3): 333–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson DA, Vakil NB, Hwang C, et al. Impact of esomeprazole on symptom control in patients with healed erosive esophagitis [abstract 2247]. Gastroenterology 2001; 120(5 Suppl. 1): A441

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blum RA, Shi H, Karol MD, et al. The comparative effects of lansoprazole, omeprazole and ranitidine in suppressing gastric acid secretion. Clin Ther 1997; 19(5): 1013–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tutuian R, Katz PO, Bochenek W, et al. Dose-dependent control of intragastric pH by pantoprazole, 10, 20 or 40mg, in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 829–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Baisley KJ, Warrington S, Tejura B, et al. Rabeprazole 20mg compared with esomeprazole 40mg in the control of intragastric pH in healthy volunteers [abstract 148]. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96(9 Suppl. ): S48

    Google Scholar 

  24. Warrington S, Baisley K, Boyce M, et al. Effects of rabeprazole, 20mg, or esomeprazole, 20mg, on 24-h intragastric pH and serum gastrin in healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 1301–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirschowitz BI. A critical analysis with appropriate controls of gastric acid and pepsin secretion in clinical esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1991; 101: 1149–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerstin Röhss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röhss, K., Wilder-Smith, C., Nauclér, E. et al. Esomeprazole 20mg Provides More Effective Intragastric Acid Control than Maintenance-Dose Rabeprazole, Lansoprazole or Pantoprazole in Healthy Volunteers. Clin. Drug Investig. 24, 1–7 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200424010-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200424010-00001

Keywords

Navigation