Skip to main content
Log in

Esomeprazole 40mg Capsules are Bioequivalent when Administered Intact or as the Contents Mixed with Applesauce

  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study was conducted to determine whether administration of the contents of an open capsule of esomeprazole (enteric-coated pellets) 40mg with applesauce is bioequivalent to administration of an intact capsule in healthy volunteers.

Participants and Study Design

45 adult male and female volunteers participated in this randomised, single-dose, nonblinded, two-way crossover study conducted at a single centre.

Results

41 volunteers completed the trial. Time to maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for esomeprazole (tmax) was approximately 2.4 hours and elimination half-life (t1/2) was approximately 0.9 hours by either mode of administration. The ratios of the geometric means for Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for capsule contents with applesauce relative to intact capsule were 0.93 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86 to 1.01) and 0.99 (90% CI: 0.94 to 1.04), respectively. The finding that the 90% CIs were within 0.80 to 1.25 for both parameters indicates bioequivalence. Esomeprazole was well tolerated by the study group irrespective of mode of administration.

Conclusions

Esomeprazole is bioequivalent when administered either as an intact capsule or as the contents of a capsule mixed with applesauce in healthy volunteers. This latter alternative mode of administration may provide benefits to patients who have difficulty swallowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilde MI, McTavish D. Omeprazole. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders. Drugs 1994; 48: 91–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiba N. Proton pump inhibitors in acute healing and maintenance of erosive or worse esophagitis: a systematic overview. Can J Gastroenterol 1997; 11 Suppl. B: 66B–73B

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlsson R, Dent J. Watts R,et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole. International GORD Study Group. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 10: 119–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson P. Hawkey CJ, Stack WA. Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders. Drugs 1998; 56: 307–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lind T. Rydberg L, Kylebäck A, et al. Esomeprazole provides improved acid control versus omeprazole in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 861–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahrilas PJ, Falk GW, Johnson DA. et al. Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomised controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1249–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Richter J, Kahrilas P, Hwang C, et al. Esomeprazole is superior to omeprazole for the healing of erosive esophagitis (EE) in patients with GERD. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: A–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson T. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole. lansoprazole and pantoprazole [published erratum appears in Clin Pharmacokinet 1996 Oct; 31 (4): 274]. Clin Pharmacokinet 1996; 31: 9–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Äbelö A, Andersson TB, Bredberg U, et al. Stereoselective metabolism by human liver CYP enzymes of a substituted benzimidazole. Drug Metab Dispos 2000; 28: 58–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson T, Bredberg E, Sunzel M, et al. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and effect on pentagastrin stimulated peak acid output (PAO) of omeprazole (O) and its 2 optical isomers, S-omeprazole/esomeprazole (E) and R-omeprazole (R-O). Presented at the VIIth World Congress on Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Florence, Italy 2000

  11. Andersson T, Röhss K. Pharmacokinetics and dose-response relationship of esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole. Presented at the VIIth World Congress on Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Florence, Italy 2000

  12. Chun A, Eason C, Shi H, et al. Lansoprazole: an alternative method of administration of a capsule dosage formulation. Clin Ther 1995; 17: 441–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lagerström PO, Persson BA. Determination of omeprazole and metabolites in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 1984; 309: 347–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chun AH, Erdman K, Zhang Y, et al. Effect on bio availability of admixing the contents of lansoprazole capsules with selected soft foods. Clin Ther 2000; 22: 231–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pillai G, Hassan M, Sheikh Salem M, et al. Effect of food on the bioavailability of omeprazole. Int J Pharm Med 1998; 12: 199–203

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larson C, Cavuto N, Flockhart D, et al. Bioavailability and efficacy of omeprazole given orally and by nasogastric tube. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41: 475–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks to Dan Godoy, BS Computer Science, for his proficient data management, and Rebecca A. Kraynak, BS, CCRA, for her overall thorough conduction of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommy Andersson.

Additional information

A poster of this study was presented at ACG2000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, T., Magner, D., Patel, J. et al. Esomeprazole 40mg Capsules are Bioequivalent when Administered Intact or as the Contents Mixed with Applesauce. Clin. Drug Investig. 21, 67–71 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200121010-00009

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200121010-00009

Keywords

Navigation