Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilating effect, tolerability and acceptability of a single 100μg dose of salbutamol inhaled via Easyhaler® multidose dry powder inhaler with a single 250μg dose of terbutaline inhaled via Turbuhaler®, also a multidose dry powder inhaler.
Design, Setting and Patients: The study was conducted according to a single-dose, crossover, randomised, double-blind with double-dummy design in four centres in Finland. A total of 29 adult patients with stable asthma without previous experience with the tested devices completed the study, which comprised 2 study days with 4-hour follow-up periods including spirometric measurements. The acceptability of the devices to the patients in the study was also evaluated.
Results: The mean (SD) maximum value of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1max) after salbutamol Easyhaler® was 3.14L (1.26L), and after terbutaline Turbuhaler® was 3.07L(1.11L). The mean (SD) percentage change from baseline of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to FEV1max was 12.7% (12.4%) after Easyhaler® and 13.1% (10.8%) after Turbuhaler®. The observed differences in the increase in FEV1 and in the area under the curve (AUC) of FEV1 between the treatments were not statistically significant. Four patients reported mild adverse events after inhaling salbutamol via Easyhaler®, compared with five patients who reported adverse events after inhaling terbutaline via Turbuhaler®. Based on the VAS assessment of the acceptability, Easyhaler® was found to be better accepted than Turbuhaler® in terms of ease of administration, ease of inhaling, and the strength of sensation on receiving a dose. Overall, 62% of the patients would have chosen Easyhaler®.
Conclusions: Easyhaler® containing salbutamol (100μg/dose) is comparable in efficacy and as well tolerated as Turbuhaler® containing terbutaline (250μg/dose), and Easyhaler® was well accepted by patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crompton GK. Problems patients have using pressurized aerosol inhalers. Eur J Respir Dis 1982; 63Suppl. 119: 101–4
Epstain SW, Manning CPR, Ashley MJ, et al. Survey of the clinical use of pressurized aerosol inhalers. Can Med Assoc J 1979; 120: 813–6
Shim Ch, Williams MH. The adequacy of inhalation of aerosol from canister nebulizers. Am J Med 1980; 69: 891–4
Nicklas RA. Paradoxical bronchospasm associated with the use of inhaled beta agonists. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 85: 959–64
Cocchetto DM, Sykes RS, Spector S. Paradoxical bronchospasm after use of inhalation aerosols: a review of the literature. J Asthma 1991; 28: 49–53
Wilkinson JRW, Roberts JA, Bradding P, et al. Paradoxical bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients after salmeterol by metered dose inhaler. BMJ 1992; 305: 931–2
Yarborough J, Mansfield LE, Ting S. Metered dose inhaler induced bronchospasm in asthmatic patients. Ann Allergy 1985; 55: 25–7
Sterling GM, Batten JC. Effect of aerosol propellants and surfactants on airway resistance. Thorax 1969; 24: 228–31
Haahtela T, Vidgren M, Nyberg A, et al. A novel multiple dose powder inhaler. Salbutamol powder and aerosol give equal bronchodilatation with equal doses. Ann Allergy 1994; 72: 178–82
Vidgren M, Silvasti M, Korhonen P, et al. Clinical equivalence of a novel multiple dose powder inhaler versus a conventional metered dose inhaler on bronchodilating effects of salbutamol. Arzneimittelforschung 1995; 45(I), 1: 44–7
Freedman BJ. Trial of a terbutaline aerosol in the treatment of asthma and a comparison of its effects with those of a salbutamol aerosol. Br J Dis Chest 1972; 66: 222–9
Simonsson BG, Stiksa J, Ström B. Double-blind study with increasing doses of salbutamol and terbutaline in patients with reversible airways obstruction. Acta Med Scand 1972; 192: 371–6
Choo-Kang YF, MacDonald HL, Horne NW. A comparison of salbutamol and terbutaline aerosols in bronchial asthma. Practitioner 1973; 211(266): 801–4
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health. International consensus report on diagnosis and treatment of asthma. Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 601–41
Senn SJ. Cross-over trials in clinical research. New York: John Wiley & sons, 1993: 135–8
Silvasti M, Laurikainen K, Nieminen M, et al. Single dose comparison between a novel multiple dose powder inhaler and a conventional metered dose inhaler in asthmatic patients. Acta Ther 1993; 19: 125–5
Nieminen MM, Vidgren M, Laurikainen K, et al. Easyhaler®, a novel multiple dose powder inhaler: clinically equivalent to salbutamol metered dose inhaler and easier to use. Respiration 1994; 61: 37–41
Vilsvik J, Schaanning J, Stahl E, et al. Comparison between Bricanyl Turbuhaler and Ventolin metered dose inhaler in the treatment of exercise-induced asthma in adults. Ann Allergy 1991; 67: 315–8
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the participating investigators Dr T. Kava, Joensuu, Dr S. Krogerus, Kinkomaa, Dr M. Lehtiniemi, Joensuu, Dr L.-H. Pláthin, Harjavalta, Dr M. Pietiläinen, Harjavalta and Dr K. Venho, Kinkomaa for their valuable contribution to the study. This study was funded by Orion Pharma, Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malinen, A., Hedman, J., Koskela, T. et al. Salbutamol via Easyhaler® Produces Equivalent Bronchodilation to Terbutaline via Turbuhaler® following Inhalation of a Single Dose of Equipotent β2-Sympathomimetic. Clin. Drug Investig. 20, 165–171 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200020030-00004
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200020030-00004