Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of Reboxetine in Volunteers with Hepatic Impairment

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Reboxetine is a unique selective norepinephrine (noradrenaline) reuptake inhibitor (selective NRI) that is effective and well tolerated at a dosage of 8 to 10 mg/day in the short- and long-term treatment of depression. The objective of the study was to assess reboxetine pharmacokinetics in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment.

Design: 12 volunteers with alcoholic liver disease received a single 4mg dose of reboxetine, and plasma reboxetine concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography.

Results: Reboxetine was well tolerated by all recipients. Compared with the pharmacokinetics of reboxetine 4mg determined in a similar study in young healthy volunteers, maximum concentration (Cmax) was up to 22% lower in patients with liver disease, the area under the plasma reboxetine concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC) was up to 92% higher, and the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2z) was up to 150% longer. When comparing volunteers with moderate (Child-Pugh score 7 to 8) and severe hepatic (Child-Pugh score 10 to 13) impairment, mean Cmax was 21% lower, mean AUC was 10% greater and t1/2,z was 23% longer in the severely impaired compared with the moderately impaired patients. Although none of these differences was statistically significant, the trend is of clinical relevance.

Conclusions: The severity of alcoholic liver disease does not appear to affect reboxetine pharmacokinetics in a statistically significant manner, but there is a clinically relevant trend in changes to reboxetine pharmacokinetics with increasing hepatic impairment. Although reboxetine 4mg was well tolerated in the present study, comparisons with historical data from young healthy volunteers suggest that a lower starting dosage of reboxetine (4 mg/day in divided doses) should be used in patients with hepatic impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montgomery SA. Reboxetine: additional benefits to the depressed patient. J Psychopharmacol 1997; 11(4 Suppl.): S9–S15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mucci M. Reboxetine: a review of antidepressanttolerability. J Psychopharmacol 1997; 11(4 Suppl.): S33–S37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards DMF, Pellizzoni C, Breuel HP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers: single oral doses, linearity and plasma protein binding. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1995; 16: 443–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pellizzoni C, Strolin Benedetti M, Poggesi I, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers: relative bioavailability and food effect. Pharmacol Res 1995; 31 Suppl.: 41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dostert P, Benedetti MS, Poggesi I. Review of pharmacokinetics and metabolism of reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1997; 7: S23–S35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sherlock S. Drugs and the liver. In: Diseases of the liver and biliary system, 8th edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989: 372–409

  7. Child CJ. The liver and portal hypertension. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pugh RNH, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60: 646–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jannuzzo MG, Ryde M, Karlmark B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers of different ages [abstract P-2-77]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1995; 5(3): 300

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tsujimoto G, Hashimoto K, Hoffman BB. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of drug therapy in old age. Pt 1. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1989; 27: 13–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pellizzoni C, Poggesi I, Jørgensen NP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers: single against repeated oral doses and lack of enzymatic alterations. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1996; 17: 623–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benfield P, Heel RC, Lewis SP. Fluoxetine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs 1986; 32: 481–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Demolis JL, Angebaud P, Grangé JD, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetics of orally administered sertraline in patients with stable chronic hepatic insufficiency and in healthy subjects. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 1993; 7: 355

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from Pharmacia & Upjohn.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tran, A., Laneury, J.P., Duchêne, P. et al. Pharmacokinetics of Reboxetine in Volunteers with Hepatic Impairment. Clin. Drug Investig. 19, 473–477 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200019060-00010

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200019060-00010

Keywords

Navigation