Skip to main content
Log in

Butenafine 1% versus Terbinafine 1% in Cream for the Treatment of Tinea Pedis

A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Comparative Study

  • Clinical Use
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and tolerability of butenafine 1% in cream with terbinafine 1% in cream in the treatment of plantar or moccasin-type tinea pedis (athlete’s foot).

Design and Setting: This was a placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

Patients and Participants: 60 men aged between 18 and 60 years (mean 35.4 years) with a mean duration of disease of 28.4 weeks, positive mycology and culture-confirmed tinea pedis participated in the study.

Methods: The participants were sequentially randomised into three parallel groups (butenafine cream, terbinafine cream and placebo). Each patient was given a precoded 25g tube and instructed to apply the trial medication to all tinea pedis lesions once daily at bedtime for 5 consecutive days per week (maximum of 2 weeks’ active treatment). Patients were examined on a weekly basis. Cure was defined as negative potassium hydroxide test results and negative fungal culture (mycological cure). Participants cured during the treatment were allowed to discontinue the treatment.

Results: By the end of the treatment 60% of all patients were cured. Butenafine cured 18 (90%) patients at 1 week and no further patients at 2 weeks. Terbinafine cured no patients at 1 week and 16 (80%) patients at 2 weeks. Placebo cured no patients at 1 week and 2 (10%) patients at 2 weeks (p < 0.0001, butenafine and terbinafine vs placebo at 2 weeks). None of the patients reported any drug-related adverse events and no patients discontinued treatment.

Conclusion: Butenafine 1% in cream is well tolerated and comparatively better than terbinafine 1% in cream or placebo to cure plantar or moccasin-type tinea pedis in men. Further clinical studies appear warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leyden JL. Tinea pedis: pathophysiology and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31 (3 Pt 2): S31–S33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Odom RB. Pathophysiology of dermatophyte infections. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28 Suppl.: S2–S7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Raboobee N, Aboobaker J, Peer AK. Tinea pedis et unguium in the Muslim community of Durban, South Africa. Int J Dermatol 1998; 37: 759–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Petranyi G, Ryder NS, Stütz A. Allylamine derivatives: new class of synthetic antifungal agents inhibiting fungal squalene epoxidase. Science 1984; 224: 1239–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Birnbaum JE. Pharmacology of the allylamines. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 782–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brennan B, Leyden JJ. Overview of topical therapy for common superficial fungal infections and the role of new topical agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36 (2 Pt 1) S3–S8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tschen E, Elewski B, Gorsulowsky DC, et al. Treatment of interdigital tina pedis with a 4-week once-daily regimen of butenafine hydrochloride 1% cream. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36 (2 Pt 1): S9–S14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stütz A. Synthesis and structure-activity correlations within allylamine Antimycotics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 554:46–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arika T, Yokoo M, Yamaguchi H. Topical treatment with butenafine significantly lowers relapse rate in an interdigital tinea pedis model in guinea pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36: 2523–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reyes BA, Beutner KR, Cullin SI, et al. Butenafine, a fungicidal benzylamine derivative, used once daily for the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis. Int J Dermatol 1997; 37: 450–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nahm WK, Orengo I, Rosen T. The antifungal agent butenafine manifests anti-inflammatory activity in vivo. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 203–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuyuki S, Ito M, Unno T, et al. Clinical usefulness of butenafine chloride on tinea pedis: comparison study with clotrimazole. Acta Dermatol 1990; 85: 299–306

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans EG, Dodman B, Williamson DM, et al. Comparison of terbinafine and clotrimazole in the treatment of tinea pedis. BMJ 1993; 307: 645–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergstresser PR, Elewski BE, Hanifin J, et al. Topical terbinafine and clotrimazole in interdigital tinea pedis: a multicenter comparison of cure and relapse rates with 1- and 4 week treatment regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28: 648–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahid Z, Butt J, Nishtar R. Multicenter double-blind study of efficacy and safety of terbinafine 1% cream compared with bifonazole 1% cream in patients with tinea pedis moccasin type. J Dermatol Treatment 1997; 8: 225–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Syed, T.A., Hadi, S.M., Qureshi, Z.A. et al. Butenafine 1% versus Terbinafine 1% in Cream for the Treatment of Tinea Pedis. Clin. Drug Investig. 19, 393–397 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200019060-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200019060-00001

Keywords

Navigation