Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the Combination of Candesartan plus Captopril in Elderly Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction

A Pilot Study

  • Clinical Use
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To verify the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of captopril (75 mg/day) and candesartan (8 mg/day) in early postinfarction phases of not thrombolysed and unreperfused anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in elderly patients.

Design and Patients: 71 patients (aged >65 years) hospitalised for anterior AMI were randomised in a double-blind manner into two groups: group A included 35 patients who received captopril 75 mg/day within 3 days of admission plus candesartan 4mg, as a first dose, and 8 mg/day successively; group B included 36 patients who received captopril 75 mg/day and placebo. 90 days after admission, patients underwent echocardiography to determine end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic diameter (EDD), E/A ratio, and E deceleration time.

Results: Patients in both groups were similar with regard to age, gender, creatine kinase peak, EF, ESV and risk factors. Six patients died during the trial and results reflect data from 65 patients who completed the 90-day study period. Group A (captopril plus candesartan; n = 32) patients showed a significant reduction in mean (SD) systolic blood pressure within the group (basal 138 ± 16mm Hg); 10 days after admission 112 ± 15mm Hg (p < 0. 001), and in comparison with group B (captopril; n = 33) patients (basal 137 ± 8 mm Hg); 10 days after admission 121 ± 13mm Hg (intragroup p < 0. 001, between the two groups p = 0. 009). Diastolic blood pressure was also lower in group A patients versus group B patients at 10 days after admission (71 ± 12 vs 79 ± 14mm Hg; p = 0. 012). At 90 days after admission, group Apatients had a smaller ESV than patients in group B (56. 5 ± 10 vs 62. 3 ± 11 ml/m2; p = 0. 03). The mitral E/A ratio was higher in group A than group B (0. 71 ± 0.16 vs 0. 63 ± 0.15; p = 0. 042). In addition, group A showed an increase of E/A ratio at 90 days after admission (p < 0. 001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in serum creatinine, blood urea and serum potassium levels.

Conclusion: The data suggest that the combination of captopril plus candesartan is feasible in the early treatment of AMI in elderly patients, and it appears that this combination has more effect on ESV and E/A ratio than captopril alone in the short term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al, on behalf of the SAVE investigators. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 669–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico. GISSI-3: effects of lisinopril and trransdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1994; 343: 1115–22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group. A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate and intravenous magnesium sulphate in over 58050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-4. Lancet 1995; 345: 669–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sigurdsson A, Held P, Swedberg K. Short and long-term neurohormonal activation following acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1068–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnstone CI, Clappison BH, Anderson WP, et al. Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on circulating and local kinin levels. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 1401–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberger MR, Tanaka W, Barchowsky A, et al. Effect of losartan on blood pressure, plasma renin activity and angiotensin II in volunteers. Hypertension 1993; 21: 704–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gottlieb SS, Dickstein K, Fleck E, et al. Hemodynamic effects of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan in patients with heart failure. Circulation 1993; 88: 1602–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crozier I, Ikram H, Awan N, et al, for the Losartan Hemodynamic Study Group. Losartan in heart failure: hemodynamic effects and tolerability. Circulation 1995; 91: 691–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, on behalf of ELITE Study Investigators. Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure: evaluation of losartan in the elderly study (ELITE). Lancet 1997; 349: 747–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pitt B, Dickstein K, Benedict CR, et al, for the RAAS Investigators. The randomised angiotensin receptor antagonist ACE inhibitor study (RAAS): pilot study [abstract]. Circulation 1996; 94:1–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolny A, Clozel JP, Rein J, et al. Functional and biochemical analysis of angiotensin II-forming pathways in the human heart. Circ Res 1997; 80: 219–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mento PF, Wilkes BM. Plasma angiotensins and blood pressure during converting enzyme inhibition. Hypertension 1987; 9: III42–III48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nussberger J, Brunner DB, Waener B, et al. Specific measurement of angiotensin metabolites and in vitro generated angiotensin II in plasma. Hypertension 1986; 8: 476–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Capasso JM, Li P, Meggs LG, et al. Efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and A1 receptor blockade on cardiac pump performance after myocardial infarction in rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 23: 584–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshiyama M, Kim S, Yamagishi H, et al. Cardioprotective effect of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist TCV-116 on ischemia reperfusion injury. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Pasquale P, Bucca V, Scalzo S, et al. Safety, tolerability, and neurohormonal changes of the combination captopril plus losartan in the early post-infarction period: a pilot study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1998; 12: 211–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Pasquale P, Bucca V, Scalzo S, et al. Does the addition of losartan improve the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with anterior myocardial infarction? A pilot study. Heart 1999; 81: 606–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation on left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2: 358–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oh JK, Appleton CP, Hatle LK, et al. The noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 246–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Skidgel RA, Erdos EC. The broad substrate specificity of human angiotensin I converting enzyme. Clin Exp Hypertens 1987; A9: 243–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Aldigier JC, Uang H, Dalmay F, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition does not suppress plasma angiotensin II increase during exercise in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993; 21: 289–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dickstein K, Chang P, Willenheimer R, et al. Comparison of the effects of losartan and enalapril on clinical status and exercise performance in patients with moderate or severe chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 438–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McKelvie RS, Yusuf S, Pericak D, et al. Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure. Randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) Pilot study Investigators. Circulation 1999: 100: 1056–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Azizi M, Chatellier G, Guyene TT, et al. Additive effects of combined angiotensin on blood pressure and renin release in sodium deplete normotensives. Circulation 1995; 92: 825–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang X, Xie Y-W, Nasjletti A, et al. ACE inhibitors promote nitric oxide accumulation to modulate myocardial oxygen consumption. Circulation 1997; 95: 176–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dickstein K, Kjekshus J, for the OPTIMAAL study group. Comparison of the effects of losartan and captopril on mortality in patients following acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL trial design. Optimal therapy in myocardial infarction with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 477–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Capasso JM, Malhotra A, Scheuer J, and Sonnenblick EH. Myocardial biochemical, contractile and electrical performance after imposition of hypertension in young and old rats. Circ Res 1986; 58: 445–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fleg JL, O’Connor F, Gerstenblith G, et al. Impact of age on the cardiovascular response to dynamic upright exercise in healthy men an women. J Appl Physiol 1995; 78: 890–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gerstenblith G, Frederiksen J, Yin FCP, et al. Echocardio-graphic assessment of a normal adult aging population. Circulation 1977: 56: 273–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schulman S, Lakatta EG, Fleg JL, et al. Age-related decline in left ventricular filling at rest and exercise. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol 34) 1992; 263: H1932–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swinne CJ, Shapiro EP, Lima SD, et al. Age-associated changes in left ventricular diastolic performance during isometric exercise in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 823–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Pasquale P, Valdes L, Albano V, et al. Early captopril treatment reduces plasma endothelin concentrations in the acute and subacute phases of myocardial infarction: a pilot study. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1997; 29: 202–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sivestre JS, Heymes C, Oubenaissa A, et al. Activation of cardiac aldosterone production in rat myocardial infarction. Circulation 1999; 99: 2694–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spinale GF, de Gasparro M, Whitebread S, et al. Modulation of the renin-angiotensin pathway through enzyme inhibition and specific receptor blockade in pacing-induced heart failure. I Effects on left ventricular performance and neurohormonal systems. Circulation 1997; 96: 2365–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Miss Valeria Anna Cuccia and Antonio Di Paola for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Di Pasquale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Pasquale, P., Cannizzaro, S., Giubilato, A. et al. Effects of the Combination of Candesartan plus Captopril in Elderly Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction. Clin. Drug Investig. 19, 173–182 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200019030-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200019030-00002

Keywords

Navigation