Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Benzatropine and Terazosin in the Treatment of Hypersalivation Secondary to Clozapine

  • Clinical Use
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: In this open-label, non-randomised, 12-week, retrospective comparative study, the efficacy and tolerability of benzatropine (benztropine) and terazosin were assessed in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder who were treated with clozapine and subsequently began to experience hypersalivation within 1 month.

Methods: Sixty clinic charts were reviewed. All patients were from long-term care facilities. Patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: (a) no treatment; (b) treatment with benzatropine 1mg twice daily; (c) treatment with terazosin 2mg once daily, at night-time; and (d) treatment with benzatropine and terazosin according to the same scheme as in (b) and (c). Clozapine dosages in these four groups were 100mg to 700mg daily (average 325mg daily). The primary target symptom (hypersalivation) was assessed and recorded by open questioning at baseline and at weeks 1, 4 and 12.

Results: The primary efficacy end-point was a comparison of the change of hypersalivation in patients’ response in the four treatment groups from baseline to week 12. All the changes were statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, treatment with benzatropine and terazosin together was more effective. Use of this combined therapy in the management of hypersalivation resulted in a 100% satisfactory response vs 66.7% of patients on benzatropine, and 93.3% of patients on terazosin. Compliance with medication was 100% and no significant adverse events were observed. The most common adverse events reported by patients were constipation, dizziness and drowsiness. However, these did not present a valid reason for discontinuation of the benzatropine and terazosin therapy during clozapine-induced hypersalivation.

Conclusion: The results of this retrospective study demonstrated that terazosin was an effective and well tolerated drug in the management of a very common adverse effect of clozapine therapy, namely, hypersalivation. The combination of benzatropine and terazosin provided consistently superior response rates to either therapy alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snyder S, Greenberg D, Yamamura H. Antipsychotic drugs and brain cholinergic receptors: affinity for muscarinic sites predicts extrapyramidal effects. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974; 31: 58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller RJ, Hiley CR. Antimuscarinic properties of neuroleptics and drug-induced parkinsonism. Nature 1974; 248: 596–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolden C, Cusack B, Richelson E. Clozapine is a potent and selective muscarinic antagonist at the five cloned human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Eur J Pharmacol 1991; 192: 205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meltzer H, Chai B, Thompson P, et al. Effect of scopolamine on the efflux of dopamine and its metabolites after clozapine, haloperidol or thioridazine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994; 268: 1452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rivest R, Marsden C. Muscarinic antagonists attenuate the increase in accumbens and striatum dopamine metabolism produced by clozapine but not by haloperidol. Br J Pharmacol 1991; 104: 234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zorn S, Jones S, Ward K, et al. Clozapine is a potent and selective muscarinic M4 receptor agonist. Eur J Pharmacol 1994; 269(3): R1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tandon R, Kane JM. Neuropharmacologic basis for clozapine’s unique profile. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 158–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolden C, Cusack B, Richelson E. Antagonism by antimuscarinic and neuroleptic compounds at the five cloned human muscarinic cholinergic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 260: 576–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen B, Lipinski J. In vivo potencies of antipsychotic drugs in blocking A1 noradrenergic and dopamine D2 receptors: implications for drug mechanism of action. Life Sci 1986; 39: 2571–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Breier A. Clozapine and noradrenergic function: support for a novel hypothesis for superior efficacy. J Clin Psychiatry 1994; 55: 9 Suppl. B: 122–5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lieberman J, Safferman A. Clinical profile of clozapine: adverse reactions and agranulocytosis. Psychiatry Q 1992; 62: 51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mandel J, Zengo A, Katz R, et al. Effect of adrenergic agents on salivary composition. J Dental Res 1975; 54 [Special issue]: B27–B33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ukai Y, Taniguchi T, Kimura K. Muscarinic supersensitivity and subsensitivity induced by chronic treatment with atropine and disopropylfluorophosphonate in rat submaxillary glands. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1989; 297: 148–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dev V, Krupp P. Adverse event profile and safety of clozapine. Pharmacotherapy 1995; 6: 197–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frankenburg FR. Clozapine update. Tufts University School of Medicine Ninth Annual Psychopharmacology Update; Oct 12, 1991

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinstein, M.J., Sirotovskaya, L.A., Chasanov, M.A. et al. Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Benzatropine and Terazosin in the Treatment of Hypersalivation Secondary to Clozapine. Clin. Drug Investig. 17, 97–102 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199917020-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199917020-00003

Keywords

Navigation