Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pharmacologic Management of Painful Oncology Procedures in Pediatrics

  • Therapy in Practice
  • Published:
American Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Children with cancer often cite procedural pain as the most distressing part of their disease. Pharmacologic interventions that decrease the pain and anxiety of invasive procedures have been shown to be beneficial, particularly when these interventions are a routine part of every procedure. However, despite the known benefits of analgesia and sedation, guidelines for the management of pediatric pain and stress during oncology procedures have not been established. Thus, children may not be receiving optimal pain relief. Various drugs have been investigated in pediatric populations to provide local anesthesia, systemic analgesia, conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. These agents include lidocaine-prilocaine, amethocaine, lidocaine, methohexital, propofol, midazolam, meperidine, nitrous oxide, fentanyl, ketamine, and diazepam. Local anesthesia with lidocaine-prilocaine and amethocaine decreases pain from accessing centrally placed venous devices (ports) and venipuncture; however, neither, is sufficient as a sole intervention for bone marrow aspirations (BMA), bone marrow biopsies (BMB) or lumbar punctures (LP). Transient local skin reactions are common with the use of lidocaine-prilocaine and amethocaine. Deep sedation or general anesthesia can be achieved with a variety of agents and are ideal interventions if pain and movement are to be prevented during more invasive procedures such as LP, BMA, and BMB. Titration of doses and monitoring to detect early adverse effects increase the safety of these interventions. Systemic analgesia with fentanyl or nitrous oxide in combination with local anesthesia may be appropriate for older children more comfortable and familiar with these procedures; conscious sedation may also be an option for these children, but deep sedation and general anesthesia should always be made available if it is the child’s preferred method of pain relief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table IV
Table V
Table V.
Table V.
Table VI
Table VII
Table VII.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian cancer statistics 2001. Toronto (ON): National Cancer institute of Canada, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Health Canada. Cancer surveillance online: cancer incidence by age group 2001 [online]. Available from URL: http://http://cythera.ic.gc.ca/dsol/cgi-bin/cancerchart2 [Accessed 2002 Jul 26]

  3. Charity Wire. Cancer facts — National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health: National Cancer Institute research on causes of cancers in children [online]. Available from URL: http://http://www.charitywire.com/charity106/01822.html [Accessed 2003 Sep 12]

  4. Ljungman G, Gordh T, Sorensen S, et al. Pain variations during cancer treatment in children: a descriptive survey. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2000; 17: 211–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeltzer L, LeBaron S. Hypnosis and nonhypnotic techniques for reduction of pain and anxiety during painful procedures in children and adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr 1982; 101: 1032–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McGrath PJ, Beyer J, Cleeland C, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics report of the subcommittee on assessment and methodologic issues in the management of pain in childhood cancer. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 814–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Cancer Institute. Phase III Randomized Study of multidrug delayed intensification therapy in children with newly diagnosed standard risk acute lymphocytic leukemia: an ALinC #17 Study [online]. Available from URL: http://http://wwwcancergov/clinical_trials/view_clinicaltrialsaspx?.version=health+professional&args=1;77a8c10b-79f4-4f06-81fc-aee3a3dfcd25 [Accessed 2002 Jul 9]

  8. Weisman SJ, Bernstein B, Schechter NL. Consequences of inadequate analgesia during painful procedures in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152: 147–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz ER, Kellerman J, Siegel SE. Behavioral distress in children with cancer undergoing medical procedures: developmental considerations. J Consult Clin Psychol 1980; 48: 356–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris CV, Bradlyn AS, Ritchey AK, et al. Individual differences in pediatric cancer patients’ reactions to invasive medical procedures: a repeated measures analysis. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1994; 11: 293–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schechter NL. The undertreatment of pain in children: an overview. Pediatr Clin North Am 1989; 36: 781–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeltzer LK, Altaian A, Cohen D, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics report of the subcommittee on the management of pain associated with procedures in children with cancer. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 826–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hain RD, Campbell C. Invasive procedures carried out in conscious children: contrast between North American and European paediatric oncology centres. Arch Dis Child 2001; 85: 12–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barnes C, Downie P, Chalkiadis G, et al. Sedation practices for Australian and New Zealand paediatric oncology patients. J Paediatr Child Health 2002; 38: 170–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Broome ME, Richtsmeier A, Maikler V, et al. Pediatric pain practices: a national survey of health professionals. J Pain Symptom Manage 1996; 11: 312–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyc VL, Bieberich AA, Hinds P, et al. A survey of pain services for pediatric oncology patients: their composition and function. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 1998; 15: 207–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hockenberry MJ, Bologna-Vaughan SB. Preparation for intrusive procedures using noninvasive techniques in children with cancer: state of the art vs new trends. Cancer Nurs 1985; 8: 97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weekes DP, Savedra MC. Adolescent cancer: coping with treatment-related pain. J Pediatr Nurs 1988; 3: 318–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuttner L. Management of young children’s acute pain and anxiety during invasive medical procedures. Paediatrician 1989; 16: 39–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellis JA, Spanos NP. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for children’s distress during bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures: a critical review. J Pain Symptom Manage 1994; 9: 96–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kazak AE, Penati B, Brophy P, et al. Pharmacologie and psychologic interventions for procedural pain. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McGrath PJ, Beyer J, Cleeland C, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics report of the subcommittee on assessment and methodologic issues in the management of pain in childhood cancer. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 814–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McGrath PA. Pain in children: nature, assessment and treatment. New York: Guliford Press, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pizzo PA, Poplack DGE. Principles and practice of pediatric oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bearison DJ, Mulhern RK. pediatric psychooncology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Franck LS, Greenberg CS, Stevens B. Pain assessment in infants and children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2000; 47: 487–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McGrath PJ, Johnson G, Goodman JT, et al. CHEOPS: a behavioural scale for rating postoperative pain in children. Adv Pain Res Ther 1985; 9: 395–402

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eland J. Minimizing pain associated with prekindergarten intramuscular injections. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 1981; 5: 361–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McGrath PA, Seifert CE, Speechley KN, et al. A new analogue scale for assessing children’s pain: an initial validation study. Pain 1996; 64: 435–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hicks CL, vonBaeyer CL, Spafford PA, et al. The faces pain scale-revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 2001; 93: 173–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Humphrey GB, Boon CM, van Linden van den Heuvell GF, et al. The occurrence of high levels of acute behavioral distress in children and adolescents undergoing routine venipunctures. Pediatrics 1992; 90: 87–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Elliott CH, Jay SM, Woody P. An observation scale for measuring children’s distress during medical procedures. J Pediatr Psychol 1987; 12: 543–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Beyer JE, Denyes MJ, Villarruel AM. The creation, validation, and continuing development of the Oucher: a measure of pain intensity in children. J Pediatr Nurs 1992; 7: 335–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hester NO, Foster R, Kristensen K. Measurement of pain in children: generalizability and validity of the pain ladder and poker chip tool. Adv Pain Res Ther 1990; 15: 79–84

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huskisson E. Visual analogue scales. New York: Raven Press, 1983: 33–7

    Google Scholar 

  36. Committee on Drugs, American Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 836–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 1110–5

    Google Scholar 

  38. Parker RI, Mahan RA, Giugliano D, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous midazolam and ketamine as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 427–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Halperin DL, Koren G, Attias D, et al. Topical skin anesthesia for venous, subcutaneous drug reservoir and lumbar punctures in children. Pediatrics 1989; 84: 281–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kapelushnik J, Koren G, Solh H, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of EMLA in alleviating pain associated with lumbar puncture; comparison of open and double-blinded protocols in children. Pain 1990; 42: 31–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Miser AW, Goh TS, Dose AM, et al. Trial of a topically administered local anesthetic (EMLA cream) for pain relief during central venous port accesses in children with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 1994; 9: 259–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Juarez Gimenez JC, Oliveras M, Hidalgo E, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of eutectic prilocaine-lidocaine cream in pediatric oncology patients undergoing lumbar puncture. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30: 1235–7

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bishai R, Taddio A, Bar-Oz B, et al. Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children. Pediatrics 1999; 104: e31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Holdsworth MT, Raisch DW, Winter SS, et al. Differences among raters evaluating the success of EMLA cream in alleviating procedure-related pain in children with cancer. Pharmacotherapy 1997; 17: 1017–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Romsing J, Henneberg SW, Walther-Larsen S, et al. Tetracaine gel vs EMLA cream for percutaneous anaesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 637–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Choy L, Collier J, Watson AR. Comparison of lignocaine-prilocaine cream and amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venepuncture in children. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 961–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Arrowsmith J, Campbell C. A comparison of local anaesthetics for venepuncture. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82: 309–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jayabose S, Levendoglu-Tugal O, Giamelli J, et al. Intravenous anesthesia with propofol for painful procedures in children with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2001; 23: 290–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Annequin D, Carbajal R, Chauvin P, et al. Fixed 50% nitrous oxide oxygen mixture for painful procedures: a French survey. Pediatrics 2000; 105: E47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Schwanda AE, Freyer DR, Sanfilippo DJ, et al. Brief unconscious sedation for painful pediatric oncology procedures: intravenous methohexital with appropriate monitoring is safe and effective. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1993; 15: 370–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Freyer DR, Schwanda AE, Sanfilippo DJ, et al. Intravenous methohexital for brief sedation of pediatric oncology outpatients: physiologic and behavioral responses. Pediatrics 1997; 99: E8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sievers TD, Yee JD, Foley ME, et al. Midazolam for conscious sedation during pediatric oncology procedures: safety and recovery parameters. Pediatrics 1991; 88: 1172–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hertzog JH, Campbell JK, Dalton HJ, et al. Propofol anesthesia for invasive procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children: experience in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatrics 1999; 103: E30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hertzog JH, Dalton HJ, Anderson BD, et al. Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 742–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen BK, Eichenfield LF. pediatric anesthesia in dermatologic surgery: when hand-holding is not enough. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 1010–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rehman HU. Methemoglobinemia. West J Med 2001; 175: 193–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Conde-Salazar L, Llinas MG, Guimaraens D, et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from amethocaine. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 19: 69–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sanchez-Perez J, Cordoba S, Cortizas CF, et al. Allergic contact balanitis due to tetracaine (amethocaine) hydrochloride. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Fernandez-Redondo V, Leon A, Santiago T, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from local anaesthetic on peristomal skin. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 45: 358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Dawe RS, Watt D, O’Neill S, et al. A laser-clinic nurse with allergic contact dermatitis from tetracaine. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 46: 306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Carpenter RL, Mackey DC. Local anesthetics. In: Barash P, Cullen B, Stoelting R, editors. Clinical anesthesia. Philadelphia (PA): Lippencott-Raven, 1992: 509–41

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sandler ES, Weyman C, Conner K, et al. Midazolam versus fentanyl as premedication for painful procedures in children with cancer. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 631–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Schechter NL, Weisman SJ, Rosenblum M, et al. The use of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for painful procedures in children. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 335–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kanagasundaram SA, Lane LJ, Cavalletto BP, et al. Efficacy and safety of nitrous oxide in alleviating pain and anxiety during painful procedures. Arch Dis Child 2001; 84: 492–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Hunter MJ, Griswold JD, Rosenberg M. Administration of methohexital for pediatric outpatient dentistry. Anesth Prog 1990; 37: 248–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Health Canada. Drug product database: discontinued product information [online]. Available from URL: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/drug2/dc/product/p14.html. [Accessed 2002 Aug 14]

  67. US Food and Drug Administration. Electronic orange book [online]. Available from URL: www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/docs/tempai.cfm. [Accessed 2002 Aug 14]

  68. Maunuksela EL, Rajantie J, Siimes MA. Flunitrazepam-fentanyl-induced sedation and analgesia for bone marrow aspiration and needle biopsy in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1986; 30: 409–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Friedman AG, Mulhern RK, Fairclough D, et al. Midazolam premedication for pediatric bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture. Med Pediatr Oncol 1991; 19: 499–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Tobias JD, Phipps S, Smith B, et al. Oral ketamine premedication to alleviate the distress of invasive procedures in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatrics 1992; 90: 537–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Marx CM, Stein J, Tyler MK, et al. Ketamine-midazolam versus meperidine-midazolam for painful procedures in pediatric oncology patients. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 94–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ellis J, McCarthy P, Gosselin P, et al. Intravenous sedation for control of distress during lumbar punctures for pediatric cancer patients. Pain Res Manag 2000; 5: 141–7

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ljungman G, Gordh T, Sorensen S, et al. Lumbar puncture in pediatric oncology: conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001; 36: 372–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Slonim AD, Ognibene FP. Sedation for pediatric procedures, using ketamine and midazolam, in a primarily adult intensive care unit: a retrospective evaluation. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1900–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Pellier I, Monrigal JP, Le Moine P, et al. Use of intravenous ketamine-midazolam association for pain procedures in children with cancer: a prospective study. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9: 61–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Tamminga RY, Noordhoek M, Kroon J, et al. Ketamine anesthesia with or without diazepam premedication for bone marrow punctures in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2000; 17: 383–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Holdsworth MT, Raisch DW, Winter SS, et al. Pain and distress from bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures. Ann Pharmacother 2003; 37: 17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kalant H, Roschlau W. Principles of medical pharmacology. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  79. Speight TM, Holford NHG. Avery’s drug treatment. 4th ed. Auckland: Adis International, 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Lisa O’Brien

  2. Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Lisa O’Brien, Lee Dupuis &  Anna Taddio

  3. Department of Anaesthesia, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Sheelagh Kemp

  4. Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada

    Lee Dupuis &  Anna Taddio

  5. Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Lee Dupuis

Authors
  1. Lisa O’Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheelagh Kemp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lee Dupuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Taddio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Brien, L., Kemp, S., Dupuis, L. et al. Pharmacologic Management of Painful Oncology Procedures in Pediatrics. Am J Cancer 2, 403–426 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00024669-200302060-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00024669-200302060-00003

Keywords

Search

Navigation