Skip to main content
Log in

Spotlight on Capecitabine in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer

  • Adis Spotlight
  • Published:
American Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug of fluorouracil which is indicated in the US and Europe, in combination with docetaxel, for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer failing anthracycline therapy, and as monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel and anthracycline therapy (US) or failing intensive chemotherapy (Europe). Capecitabine is also approved for use in metastatic colorectal cancer. Capecitabine is metabolically activated preferentially at the tumor site, and shows antineoplastic activity and synergy with other cytotoxic agents including cyclophosphamide or docetaxel in animal models. Bioavailability after oral administration is close to 100%.

In patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer, capecitabine is effective as monotherapy and also in combination with other agents. Combination therapy with capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks of every 3-week cycle plus intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day one of each cycle was superior to intravenous monotherapy with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day one of each cycle. Capecitabine plus docetaxel significantly reduced the risks of disease progression and death by 35% (p = 0.0001) and 23% (p < 0.05), respectively, and significantly increased median survival (p < 0.05) and objective response rates (p < 0.01). Efficacy has also been demonstrated with capecitabine monotherapy and combination therapy in previously untreated patients in preliminary trials.

The most common adverse effects occurring in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy include lymphopenia, anemia, diarrhea, hand-and-foot syndrome, nausea, fatigue, hyperbilirubinaemia, dermatitis and vomiting (all >25% incidence). While gastrointestinal events and hand-and-foot syndrome occurred more often with capecitabine than with paclitaxel or a regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF), neutropenic fever, arthralgia, pyrexia and myalgia were more common with paclitaxel, and nausea, stomatitis, alopecia and asthenia were more common with CMF. The incidence of adverse effects and hospitalization was similar in patients receiving capecitabine plus docetaxel and those receiving docetaxel monotherapy.

In conclusion, capecitabine, an oral prodrug of fluorouracil which is activated preferentially at the tumor site, is an effective and convenient addition to the intravenous polychemotherapeutic treatment of advanced breast cancer in pretreated patients, and also has potential as a component of first-line combination regimens. Combined capecitabine plus docetaxel therapy resulted in similar rates of treatment-related adverse effects and hospitalization to those seen with docetaxel monotherapy. Capecitabine is also effective as monotherapy in pretreated patients and phase II data for capecitabine as first-line monotherapy are also promising. While gastrointestinal effects and hand-and-foot syndrome occur often with capecitabine, the tolerability profile was comparatively favorable for other adverse effects (notably, neutropenia and alopecia).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGavin JK, Goa KL. Capecitabine: a review of its use in the treatment of advanced breast or metastatic colorectal cancer. Drugs 2001; 61: 2309–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Endo M, Shinbori N, Fukase Y, et al. Induction of thymidine phosphorylase expression and enhancement of efficacy of capecitabine or 5′-deox∼ y-5-fluorouridine by cyclophosphamide in mammary tumor models. Int J Cancer 1999 Sep 24; 83; 127–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujimoto-Ouchi K, Tanaka Y, Tominaga T. Schedule dependency of antitumor activity in combination therapy with capecitabine/5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and docetaxel in breast cancer models. Clin Cancer Res 2001 Apr; 7(4): 1079–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reigner B, Blesch K, Weidekamm E. Clinical pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40; 85–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reigner B, Verweij J, Dirix L, et al. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites following oral administration in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 1998; Apr 4; 941-8

  6. Judson IR, Beale PJ, Trigo JM, et al. A human capecitabine excretion balance and pharmacokinetic study after administration of a single oral dose of 14 C-labelled drag. Invest New Drugs 1999; 17: 49–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roche Laboratories Inc. Xeloda™ (capecitabine) tablets. US product information. Nutley (NJ): Roche Laboratories Inc., 2002

    Google Scholar 

  8. Villalona-Calero MA, Weiss GR, Burris HA, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1915–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 2002 Jun 15; 20(12): 2812–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Talbot DC, Moiseyenko V, Van Belie S, et al. Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda®) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines. Br J Cancer 2002 May 6; 86(9): 1367–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU, et al. Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clm Oncol 1999; 17(2): 485–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blum JL, Dieras V, Lo Russo PM, et al. Multicenter, phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients. Cancer 2001 Oct 1; 92: 1759–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cervantes G, Torrecillas L, Erazo AA, et al. Capecitabine (Xeloda) as treatment after failure to taxanes for metastatic breast cancer [abstract 469]. 36th Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000 May 20; 19: 121a

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fumoleau P, Largillier R, Trillet-Lenoir V, et al. Capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC), previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: results of a large phase II study [abstract 244]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002 May 18; 21(1): 62a

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reichardt P, von Minckwitz G, Lück HJ, et al. Capecitabine: the new standard in metastatic breast cancer failing anthracycline and taxane-containing chemotherapy? Mature results of a large multicenter phase II trial [abstract 699]. Eur I Cancer 2001 Oct; 37(Suppl. 6): S191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong ZW, Wong KK, Chew L, et al. Capecitabine as an oral chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of refractory metastatic breast cancer [abstract 466]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000 May 20; 19: 120

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jakob A, Bokemeyer C, Knop S, et al. Capecitabine in patients with breast cancer relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation: a phase II study. Anticancer Drugs 2002 Apr; 13(4): 405–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guthrie TH, Agaliotis DP, Gaddis TG. Capecitabine (C) has activity in breast cancer patients (BCP) progressing after autologous peripheral stem cell transplant (AuPSCT) [abstract 356]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999; 57(1): 90

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bashey A, Sundaram S, Corringham S, et al. Use of capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2001; 13(6): 434–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Batista N, Perez Manga G, Constenia M, et al. Phase II study of capecitabine (Xeloda) in combination with paclitaxel (P) in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC): preliminary results [abstract 130P]. Ann Oncol 2000; 11(Suppl. 4): 32

    Google Scholar 

  21. Welt A, von Minckwitz G, Borquez D, et al. Capecitabine in combination with vinorelbin in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of an extended phase II study [abstract 202P]. Ann Oncol 2002; 13Suppl. 5: 56

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bangeinann N, Kuhle A, Ebert A, et al. Capecitabine combined with trastuzumab in the therapy of intensively pretreated HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract 653P]. Ann Oncol 2000; 11Suppl. 4: 143

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oshaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V, et al. Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2001 Sep; 12(9): 1247–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meza LA, Amin B, Horsey M, et al. A phase II study of capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel as first or second line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract 2029]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001 May 12; 20 (Pt 2): 70

    Google Scholar 

  25. Venturini M, Caizeddu T, Durando A, et al. A multicenter phase II study of TEX regimen (Taxotere, Epirubicin, and Xeloda) as a first line treatment in advanced breast cancer [abstract B32]. Ann Oncol 2001; 12(Suppl. 4): 25

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kattan J, Ghosn M, Farhat F, et al. Phase II study of vinorelbine (Navelline) and capecitabine (C) combination (Navcap) as first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract 201P]. Ann Oncol 2002; 13(Suppl. 5): 56

    Google Scholar 

  27. Malfair Taylor S, Barnett J, Chia S. Population based cost-effectiveness analysis of combination capecitabine and docetaxel (DC) versus single agent docetaxel (D) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) following an anthracycline regimen [abstract 113]. Eur J Cancer 2002 Mar; 38(Suppl. 3): S67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hornberger JC, Jamieson C, O’Shaughnessy J. Economic evaluation of capecitabine-docetaxel combination treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a microsimulation study. Arlington (VA): International Society for Pharmaco-economics and Outcomes Research, 2002 May 19

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roche Laboratories Inc.. Xeloda™ (capecitabine) tablets package insert. Nutley (NJ): Roche Laboratories Inc., 1998

    Google Scholar 

  30. Europe approves Xeloda (capecitabine) for breast cancer [online]. Available from URL: www.pslgroup.com/dg/214F7E.htm [Accessed 2002 Nov 13]

  31. Roche Limited. Xeloda (capecitabine) tablets. European summary of product characteristics. Welwyn Garden City: Roche Limited, 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The full text article in Drugs 2003; 63 (2): 217-36 was reviewed by: D.R. Budman, Don Monti Division of Oncology, North Shore University Hospital, New York, New York, USA; F.M. Muggia, Kaplan Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; D. Papamichael, Department of Medical Oncology, BOC Oncology Centre, Strovolos, Nicosia, Cyprus; P.N. Plowman, Department of Radiotherapy, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, England; C. Twelves, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Glasgow, Scotland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antona J. Wagstaff.

Additional information

This Spotlight is derived from abstract and summary text of an Adis Drug Evaluation originally published in full in Drugs 2003; 63 (2): 217–36.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagstaff, A.J., Ibbotson, T. & Goa, K.L. Spotlight on Capecitabine in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer. Am J Cancer 2, 137–140 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00024669-200302020-00008

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00024669-200302020-00008

Keywords

Navigation