Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Glioblastoma Multiforme

A Meta-Analysis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
CNS Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: A meta-analysis of chemotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was performed. We sought to update prior analyses by focusing exclusively on GBM, including new trials of novel treatments, assessing effectiveness of individual treatment categories and presenting data in a clinically useful format.

Methods: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted for randomised controlled trials of chemotherapy in GBM.

Results: Relative risks (RRs) for survival in 16 trials comparing chemotherapy with no chemotherapy were 1.18 (95% CI 1.08, 1.30) at 6 months, 1.53 (95% CI 1.26, 1.86) at 12 months and 2.12 (95% CI 1.60, 2.80) at 24 months. Nitrosourea compounds, local therapy (e.g. carmustine [1,3-bis [2-chloroethyl]-1-nitrosourea] wafers) and temozolomide were all more effective than no chemotherapy. Absolute increases in survival at 6, 12 and 24 months were 11%, 8% and 1%, respectively, for nitrosourea compounds; 8%, 24% and 5%, respectively, for local therapy; and 4%, 15% and 17%, respectively, for temozolomide. Efficacy of local therapy and temozolomide peaked at 12 and 18 months, respectively. After 2 years, nitrosourea compounds no longer provided clinically relevant benefit (number needed-to-treat [NNT] = 100; effect size [ES] = 0.17 SD), local therapy had diminishing returns (NNT = 20) that remained clinically relevant (ES = 0.71 SD) and temozolomide continued to show good efficacy (NNT = 5.9; ES = 0.74 SD). Survival was not significantly improved with multi-agent versus single-agent nitrosourea-based therapy in five trials: 6-month RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.71, 1.16); 24-month RR 1.33 (95% CI 0.72, 2.46).

Conclusion: Although nitrosourea compounds, local therapy and temozolomide are all effective in the treatment of GBM, local therapy and temozolomide may be associated with greater response, with clinically significant benefits extending to 24 months. The timing of peak benefits of local and temozolomide therapy suggests this combination may be more effective than single-agent chemotherapy and warrants further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II
Table III
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table IV
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2005; 109: 93–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grossman SA, Batara JF. Current management of glioblastoma multiforme. Semin Oncol 2004; 31: 635–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 6892–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McLendon RE, Halperin EC. Is the long-term survival of patients with intracranial glioblastoma multiforme overstated? Cancer 2003; 98: 1745–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reardon DA, Rich JN, Friedman HS, et al. Recent advances in the treatment of malignant astrocytoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1253–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff JE, Trilling T, Molenkamp G, et al. Chemosensitivity of glioma cells in vitro: a meta analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1999; 125: 481–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeAngelis LM. Benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade gliomas. Semin Oncol 2003; 30: 15–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossman SA. Arguments against the routine use of currently available adjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade gliomas. Semin Oncol 2003; 30(6 Suppl. 19): 19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fine HA, Dear KB, Loeffler JS, et al. Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer 1993; 71: 2585–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glioma Meta-Analysis Trialists (GMT) Group. Chemotherapy for high-grade glioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (3): CD003913

  11. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 987–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jadad AR, Moore A, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Egger M, Altman DG, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. McQuay HJ, Moore A. Systematic review series: using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 712–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995; 310: 452–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Academic Press, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  18. Solero CL, Monfardini S, Brambilla C, et al. Controlled study with BCNU vs. CCNU as adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery plus radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Clin Trials 1979; 2: 43–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hildebrand J, Sahmoud T, Mignolet F, et al. Adjuvant therapy with dibromodulcitol and BCNU increases survival of adults with malignant gliomas. EORTC Brain Tumor Group. Neurology 1994; 44: 1479–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Valtonen S, Timonen U, Toivanen P, et al. Interstitial chemotherapy with carmustine-loaded polymers for high-grade gliomas: a randomized double-blind study. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 44–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fischer SP, Lindermuth J, Hash C, et al. Levamisole in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. J Surg Oncol 1985; 28: 214–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Muller H, Brock M, Ernst H. Long-term survival and recurrence-free interval in combined surgical, radio- and chemotherapy of malignant brain gliomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1985; 87: 167–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Garfield J, McDonald H, Punt J, et al. Cisplatin does not enhance the effect of radiation therapy in malignant gliomas. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 568–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lissoni P, Meregalli S, Nosetto L, et al. Increased survival time in brain glioblastomas by a radioneuroendocrine strategy with radiotherapy plus melatonin compared to radiotherapy alone. Oncology 1996; 53: 43–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lissoni P, Meregalli S, Fossati V, et al. Radioendocrine therapy of brain tumors with the long acting opioid antagonist naltrexone in association with radiotherapy. Tumori 1993; 79: 198–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Takakura K, Abe H, Tanaka R. Effects of ACNU and radiotherapy on malignant glioma. J Neurosurg 1986; 64: 53–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheleg SV, Korotkevich EA, Zhayrid EA, et al. Local chemotherapy with cisplatin-depot for glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 2002; 60: 53–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang CH, Horton J, Schoenfeld D, et al. Comparison of postoperative radiotherapy and combined postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of malignant gliomas. A joint Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Cancer 1983; 52: 997–1007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cianfriglia F, Pompili A, Riccio A, et al. CCNU-chemotherapy of hemispheric supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer 1980; 45: 1289–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Westphal M, Hilt DC, Bortey E, et al. A phase 3 trial of local chemotherapy with biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers (Gliadel wafers) in patients with primary malignant glioma. Neuro Oncol 2003; 5: 79–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Medical Research Council Brain Tumour Working Party. Randomized trial of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in the adjuvant treatment of high-grade astrocytoma: a Medical Research Council trial. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 509–18

    Google Scholar 

  32. Athanassiou H, Synodinou M, Maragoudakis E, et al. Randomized phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2372–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Costanza M, Buechler M, Munzenreider J, et al. Radiation plus adjuvant CCNU (1-[2-chloroethyl]-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea) vs CCNU, hydroxyurea and vincristine in the treatment of malignant glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1979; 5: 1589–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Buckner JC, Schomberg PJ, McGinnis WL, et al. A phase III study of radiation therapy plus carmustine with or without recombinant interferon-alpha in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma. Cancer 2001; 92: 420–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Grossman SA, O’Neill A, Grunnet M, et al. Phase III study comparing three cycles of infusional carmustine and cisplatin followed by radiation therapy with radiation therapy and concurrent carmustine in patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 2394. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1485–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shibata S, Mori K, Moriyama T. Randomized controlled study of the effect of adjuvant immunotherapy with picibanil on 51 malignant gliomas. Surg Neurol 1987; 27: 259–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wong R, Malthaner R. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (without surgery) compared with radiotherapy alone in localized carcinoma of the esophagus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (1): CD002092

  38. Stocken DD, Buchler MW, Dervenis C, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised adjuvant therapy trials for pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 1372–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bernstein ED, Herbert SM, Hanna NH. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 291–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fung LK, Ewend MG, Sills A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of interstitial delivery of carmustine, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel from a biodegradable polymer implant in the monkey brain. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 672–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr Spiegel is supported by VA HSR&D Research Career Development Award RCD 03-179-2. Dr Esrailian is supported by NIH Training Grant T32 DK07180-30. Drs Spiegel and Esrailian are supported by the CURE Digestive Diseases Research Center (NIH 2P30 DK 041301-17).

This investigator-initiated study received funding from MGI Pharma (Baltimore, MD, USA). MGI Pharma manufactures carmustine wafers (Gliadel®), which is one of the therapies included in this analysis. Three authors (Brennan Spiegel, Eric Esrailian and Marc Chamberlain), two of whom (Brennan Spiegel and Eric Esrailian) performed the literature search, data abstraction and analyses and (with Marc Chamberlain) wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, were unaware of this funding source until the manuscript was completed. One author (Loren Laine) was aware of the funding source. Although he did have involvement in defining the aim of the study, designing the search strategy and manuscript preparation, he did not perform the data abstraction or statistical analyses. No funding source was involved in the literature search, data abstraction, data analysis, data synthesis or manuscript preparation.

Dr Chamberlain has received speakers bureau honoraria from MGI Pharma, Enzon, Chiron and Schering-Plough. Dr Laine has acted as a consultant to MGI Pharma. The authors have no other conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brennan M. R. Spiegel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiegel, B.M.R., Esrailian, E., Laine, L. et al. Clinical Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Glioblastoma Multiforme. CNS Drugs 21, 775–787 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200721090-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200721090-00006

Keywords

Navigation