Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy in a Progressive Disease A Study of Donepezil in Alzheimer’s Disease
Peter Johannsen Email author Eric Salmon Harald Hampel Yikang Xu Sharon Richardson Suzanne Qvitzau Rachel Schindler Original Research Article First Online: 29 August 2012
20
Citations
129
Downloads
Abstract Objective : To determine the value of continued donepezil treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease for whom clinical benefit was initially judged to be uncertain.
Methods : The study consisted of three phases: (i) a 12- to 24-week, pre-randomisation, open-label donepezil-treatment phase; (ii) a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase; and (iii) a 12-week, single-blind (i.e. patient-blind) donepezil-treatment phase. Patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease received open-label treatment with donepezil (5 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 10 mg/day for the remainder of the phase) for 12–24 weeks. Patients who exhibited a decline or no change from baseline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and whose physician was not sufficiently certain of clinical benefit to warrant continued treatment were randomised into the double-blind phase in which patients received 12 weeks of treatment with donepezil (10 mg/day) or placebo. At the end of the double-blind phase, donepezil-treated patients continued to receive donepezil, while placebo-treated patients were rechallenged with donepezil, in a 12-week single-blind phase. Patients were assessed at the start of the double-blind phase and at weeks 6 and 12 of this phase, and at the end of the single-blind phase.
Results : Six hundred and nineteen patients completed the open-label phase; 69% showed clear clinical benefit and 31% showed uncertain benefit. 202 patients were randomised to continued donepezil treatment (n = 99) or placebo (n = 103). Differences in favour of continued donepezil versus placebo were observed in cognition and behaviour. In addition, there was a non-significant trend favouring donepezil in activities of daily living (ADL) [week 12 observed case mean treatment differences: MMSE, 1.13 (p = 0.02); Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale, 0.57 (p = 0.5); the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, −3.16 (p = 0.02); Disability Assessment for Dementia scale, 3.67 (p = 0.1)].
Conclusion : Most patients showed clear clinical benefit during initial donepezil treatment. Among patients for whom clinical benefit was uncertain, improvement in cognition and behaviour were observed for those who continued donepezil treatment compared with the group switched to placebo. Initial decline or stabilisation does not necessarily indicate a lack of efficacy in Alzheimer’s disease, and the decision to discontinue treatment should be based on an evaluation of all domains (cognition, behaviour and ADL) and performed at several timepoints.
References 1.
Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, et al. Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol 2003; 60: 1119–22
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 2.
Reichman WE. Current pharmacologic options for patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2003; 2: 1
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 3.
Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al. A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50: 136–45
Google Scholar 4.
Rosier M, Anand R, Cicin-Sain A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318: 633–8
Google Scholar 5.
Tariot PN, Solomon PR, Morris JC, et al. A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD. The Galantamine USA-10 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54: 2269–76
Google Scholar 6.
Areosa SA, Sherriff F. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD003154
Google Scholar 7.
Birks JS, Harvey R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD001190
Google Scholar 8.
Birks J, Grimley Evans J, Iakovidou V, et al. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (4): CD001191
Google Scholar 9.
Olin J, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (4): CD001747
Google Scholar 10.
Mohs RC, Doody RS, Morris JC, et al. A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients [published erratum appears in Neurology 2001; 57: 1942]. Neurology 2001; 57: 481–8
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 11.
Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57: 489–95
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 12.
Gauthier S, Feldman H, Hecker J, et al. Efficacy of donepezil on behavioral symptoms in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr 2002; 14: 389–404
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 13.
Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, et al. A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease [published erratum appears in Neurology 2001; vn57: 2153]. Neurology 2001; 57: 613–20
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 14.
Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, et al. Efficacy of donepezil on maintenance of activities of daily living in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease and the effect on caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51: 737–44
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 15.
Rogers SL, Doody RS, Pratt RD, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: final analysis of a US multicentre open-label study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2000; 10: 195–203
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 16.
Doody RS, Geldmacher DS, Gordon B, et al. Open-label, multicenter, phase 3 extension study of the safety and efficacy of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 427–33
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 17.
Geldmacher DS, Provenzano G, McRae T, et al. Donepezil is associated with delayed nursing home placement in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51: 937–44
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 18.
Lopez OL, Becker JT, Wisniewski S, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment alters the natural history of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 310–4
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 19.
Wimo A, Winblad B, Engedal K, et al. An economic evaluation of donepezil in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: results of a 1-year, double-blind, randomized trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2003; 15: 44–54
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 20.
Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, et al. Economic evaluation of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2004 Aug 24; 63: 644–50
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 21.
Doody RS, Stevens JC, Beck C, et al. Practice parameter: management of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2001; 56: 1154–66
Google Scholar 22.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 23.
Drugs of Alzheimer’s disease: full guidance [online]. Available from URL:
http://www.nice.org.uk [Accessed 2003 Dec 23]
24.
Mayeux R, Sano M. Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1670–9
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 25.
Winblad B, Brodaty H, Gauthier S, et al. Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease: is there a need to redefine treatment success? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16: 653–66
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 26.
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994
Google Scholar 27.
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 939–44
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 28.
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA 1997; 277: 925–6
CrossRef Google Scholar 29.
Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1984; 141: 1356–64
PubMed Google Scholar 30.
Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, et al. The neuropsychiatrie inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 1994; 44: 2308–14
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 31.
Gelinas I, Gauthier L, Mclntyre M, et al. Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: the disability assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53: 471–81
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 32.
Galasko D. An integrated approach to the management of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing cognition, function and behaviour. Eur J Neurol 1998; 5Suppl. 4: S9–17
CrossRef Google Scholar 33.
Rockwood K, Graham JE, Fay S. Goal setting and attainment in Alzheimer’s disease patients treated with donepezil. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 500–7
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 34.
Berger F, Winkel M, Hampel H, et al. Individual Symptom Score (IndiSS): a pragmatic approach to clinically relevant outcomes in dementia studies [abstract]. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51: S167
Google Scholar 35.
Matthews H, Korkey J, Wilkinson D, et al. Donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: eighteen month results from Southampton memory clinic. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15: 713–20
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 36.
Rymer S, Salloway S, Norton L, et al. Impaired awareness, behavior disturbance, and caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2002; 16: 248–53
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 37.
Steele C, Rovner B, Chase GA, et al. Psychiatric symptoms and nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147: 1049–51
PubMed Google Scholar 38.
Leon J, Cheng CK, Neumann PJ. Alzheimer’s disease care: costs and potential savings. Health Aff (Millwood) 1998; 17: 206–16
CrossRef Google Scholar 39.
Auriacombe S, Pere J-J, Loria-Kanza Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease who failed to benefit from treatment with donepezil. Curr Med Res Opin 2002; 18: 129–38
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 40.
Morris JC, Farlow MR, Ferris SH, et al. Therapeutic continuity in Alzheimer’s disease: switching patients to galantamine. Clin Ther 2001; 23Suppl. A: A1–39
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 41.
Pratt RD, Perdomo CA, Surick IW, et al. Donepezil: tolerability and safety in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56: 710–7
PubMed Google Scholar © Adis Data Information BV 2006
Authors and Affiliations Peter Johannsen Email author Eric Salmon Harald Hampel Yikang Xu Sharon Richardson Suzanne Qvitzau Rachel Schindler 1. Section 6702, Memory Disorder Unit, Department of Neurology Copenhagen Memory Clinic, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark 2. Department of Neurology University Hospital Liège Belgium 3. Department of Psychiatry Ludwig Maximilian University Munich Germany 4. Clinical Data Operations, Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals Pfizer Inc. New York USA 5. Eisai Inc. Teaneck USA 6. Pfizer Denmark Copenhagen Denmark 7. Worldwide Neurosciences Pfizer Inc. New York USA