Skip to main content
Log in

Cerebrovascular Dementia

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
CNS Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most common cause of dementia and can coexist with other causes of dementia. VaD may be preventable and improvement with therapy is possible; thus, early diagnosis is essential.

The conventional concept of VaD is that of multi-infarct dementia. However, VaD is not limited to multi-infarct dementia; it arises from various vascular mechanisms and changes in the brain, and has various clinical manifestations with different causes. Critical conceptual questions include what constitutes the cognitive syndrome and what are the vascular causes; these lead to consideration of whether the term ‘vascular dementia’ should be replaced by a milder and broader category of ‘vascular cognitive impairment’ and of what location, extent, type, tempo and combination of ischaemic brain changes are critical to the development of VaD.

Current diagnostic criteria for VaD are based on the cerebral infarct concept. The criteria of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l’Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) include the presence of dementia and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and a relationship between these two disorders. CVD is defined as the presence of focal neurological signs with or without a history of stroke and evidence of relevant CVD by brain imaging (e.g. multiple large-vessel strokes, single strategically placed infarct, multiple lacunae, extensive ischaemic white matter lesions). The relationship between dementia and CVD is based on onset of dementia within 3 months following a recognised stroke, and/or an abrupt deterioration in cognitive functions or fluctuating, stepwise progression of cognitive deficits. Supporting clinical features for diagnosis of VaD include early presence of gait disturbance, history of unsteadiness and frequent unprovoked falls, early urinary symptoms, personality and mood changes, depression, psychomotor retardation and abnormal executive function.

Main tools for the diagnosis of VaD include detailed history, neurological examination, clinical or neuropsychological mental status examination and relevant laboratory examinations; brain imaging is essential, preferably using magnetic resonance imaging.

In primary and secondary prevention the targets are vascular risk factors (e.g. arterial hypertension, cardiac abnormalities, lipid abnormalities) and CVD according to its type (e.g. large-artery, small vessel, cardiogenic). Nimodipine, memantine and propentofylline have shown encouraging effects in the symptomatic and neuroprotective treatment of VaD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hebert R, Brayne C. Epidemiology of vascular dementia. Neuroepidemiology 1995; 14(5): 240–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rocca WA, Hofman A, Brayne C, et al. The prevalence of vascular dementia in Europe: facts and fragments from 1980–1990 studies. EURODEM-Prevalence Research Group. Ann Neurol 1991; 30(6): 817–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skoog I, Nilsson L, Palmertz B, et al. A population-based study of dementia in 85-year-olds [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(3): 153–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Mayeux R, et al. Dementia after stroke: baseline frequency, risks, and clinical features in a hospitalized cohort. Neurology 1992; 42(6): 1185–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tatemichi TK, Paik M, Bagiella E, et al. Risk of dementia after stroke in a hospitalized cohort: results of a longitudinal study. Neurology 1994; 44(10): 1885–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, et al. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease. The Nun Study [see comments]. JAMA 1997; 277(10): 813–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hachinski V. Preventable senility: a call for action against the vascular dementias [see comments]. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 340(8820): 645–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Erkinjuntti T, Hachinski VC. Rethinking vascular dementia. Cerebrovasc Dis 1993; 3: 3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hachinski VC, Lassen NA, Marshall J. Multi-infarct dementia. A cause of mental deterioration in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1974; 2: 207–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Skoog I. Status of risk factors for vascular dementia. Neuroepidemiology 1998; 17(1): 2–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pasquier F, Leys D. Why are stroke patients prone to develop dementia? J Neurol 1997; 244(3): 135–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Desmond DW. Vascular dementia: a construct in evolution. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1996; 8(4): 296–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chui HC. Dementia: a review emphasizing clinicopathologic correlation and brain-behavior relationships. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 806–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatemichi TK. How acute brain failure becomes chronic. A view of the mechanisms and syndromes of dementia related to stroke. Neurology 1990; 40: 1652–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. AmarK, Wilcock G. Vascular dementia. BMJ 1996; 312(7025): 227–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brun A. Pathology and pathophysiology of cerebrovascular dementia: pure subgroups of obstructive and hypoperfusive etiology. Dementia 1994; 5(3-4): 145–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erkinjuntti T. Clinicopathological study of vascular dementia. In: Prohovnik I, Wade J, Knezevic S, et al., editors. Vascular dementia: current concepts. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996:73–112

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gorelick PB. Status of risk factors for dementia associated with stroke. Stroke 1997; 28(2): 459–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Welch GN, Loscalzo J. Mechanisms of disease: homocysteine and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1042–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coull BM, Levine SR, Brey RL. The role of antiphospholipid antibodies in stroke. Neurol Clin 1992; 10: 125–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moroney JT, Bagiella E, Desmond DW, et al. Risk factors for incident dementia after stroke. Role of hypoxic and ischemic disorders. Stroke 1996; 27(8): 1283–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Work Group. Neurology 1993; 43: 250–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Englund E, Brun A, Ailing C. White matter changes in dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Biochemical and neuropathological correlates. Brain 1988; 111: 1425–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mielke R, Herholz K, Grond M, et al. Severity of vascular dementia is related to volume of metabolically impaired tissue. Arch Neurol 1992; 49(9): 909–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Erkinjuntti T, Bowler JV, DeCarli SC, et al. Imaging of static brain lesions in vascular dementia: implications for clinical trials. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. In press

  26. Erkinjuntti T, Haltia M, Palo J, et al. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia: a prospective clinical and postmortem neuropathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51(8): 1037–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, et al. Dementia three months after stroke. Baseline frequency and effect of different definitions of dementia in the Helsinki Stroke Aging Memory Study (SAM) cohort. Stroke 1997; 28(4): 785–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Verhey FR, Lodder J, Rozendaal N, et al. Comparison of seven sets of criteria used for the diagnosis of vascular dementia. Neuroepidemiology 1996; 15(3): 166–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wetterling T, Kanitz RD, Borgis KJ. Comparison of different diagnostic criteria for vascular dementia (ADDTC, DSM-IV, ICD-10, NINDS-AIREN). Stroke 1996; 27(1): 30–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bowler JV, Hachinski V. Vascular cognitive impairment: a new approach to vascular dementia. Baillieres Clin Neurol 1995; 4(2): 357–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Erkinjuntti T. Clinical criteria for vascular dementia: the NINDS-AIREN criteria. Dementia 1994; 5: 189–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rockwood K, Parhad I, Hachinski V, et al. Diagnosis of vascular dementia: Consortium of Canadian Centers for Clinical Cognitive Research consensus statement. Can J Neurol Sci 1994; 21(4): 358–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gold G, Giannakopoulos P, Montes-Paixao JC, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of newly proposed clinical criteria for possible vascular dementia. Neurology 1997; 49(3): 690–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chui HC, Victoroff JI, Margolin D, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of ischemic vascular dementia proposed by the State of California Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers [see comments]. Neurology 1992; 42 (3 Pt 1): 473–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Amar K, Wilcock GK, Scott M. The diagnosis of vascular dementia in the light of the new criteria [see comments]. Age Ageing 1996; 25(1): 51–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lopez OL, Larambe MR, Becker JT, et al. Reliability of NTNDS-AIREN clinical criteria for the diagnosis of vascular dementia [see comments]. Neurology 1994; 44(7): 1240–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wallin A, Blennow K. The clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia. Dementia 1994; 5(3-4): 181–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Loeb C, Meyer JS. Vascular dementia: still a debatable entity? J Neurol Sci 1996; 143(1-2): 31–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cummings JL. Vascular subcortical dementias: clinical aspects. Dementia 1994; 5(3-4): 177–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Erkinjuntti T. Types of multi-infarct dementia. Acta Neurol Scand 1987; 75: 391–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Konno S, Meyer JS, Terayama Y, et al. Classification, diagnosis and treatment of vascular dementia. Drugs Aging 1997; 11(5): 361–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sulkava R, Erkinjuntti T. Vascular dementia due to cardiac arrhythmias and systemic hypotension. Acta Neurol Scand 1987; 76: 123–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mahler ME, Cummings JL. The behavioural neurology of multi-infarct dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1991; 5: 122–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Roman GC. Senile dementia of the Binswanger type. A vascular form of dementia in the elderly. JAMA 1987; 258: 1782–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Babikian V, Ropper AH. Binswanger’s disease: a review. Stroke 1987; 18: 2–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ishii N, Nishihara Y, Imamura T. Why do frontal lobe symptoms predominate in vascular dementia with lacunes? Neurology 1986; 36(3): 340–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Erkinjuntti T. Vascular dementia: challenge of clinical diagnosis. Int Psychogeriatr 1997; 9 Suppl. 1: 51–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental State’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Erkinjuntti T, Ostbye T, Steenhuis R, et al. The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia. N Engl J Med 1997; 337(23): 1667–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Ylikoski R, et al. Clinical determinants of poststroke dementia. Stroke 1998; 29(1): 75–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, et al. Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 1975; 32(9): 632–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Moroney JT, Bagiella E, Desmond DW, et al. Meta-analysis of the Hachinski Ischemic Score in pathologically verified dementias. Neurology 1997; 49(4): 1096–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R. Diagnosis of multi-infarct dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1991; 5(2): 112–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Orrell RW, Wade JPH. Clinical diagnosis: how good is it and how should it be done. In: Prohovnik I, Wade J, Knezevic S, et al., editors. Vascular dementia: current concepts. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996: 143–63

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hachinski VC, Norris JW. Acute stroke. 1st ed. Philadelphia (PA): F.A. Davis Company, 1985

  56. Slooter AT, Tang MX, van Duijn CM, et al. Apolipoprotein E ε4 and the risk of dementia with stroke. A population-based investigation [see comments]. JAMA 1997; 277(10): 818–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. McKeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, et al. Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the Consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology 1996; 47(5): 1113–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Anonymous. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. The Lund and Manchester Groups. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57 (4): 416-8

  59. Marder K, Tang MX, Cote L, et al. The frequency and associated risk factors for dementia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 695–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Tolosa E, Valldeoriala F, Marti MJ. Clinical diagnosis and diagnostic criteria of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steel-Richardson -Olsewski syndrome). J Neurol Transm Suppl 1994; 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wenning GK, Ben-Sholomo Y, Magalhaes M, et al. Clinicopathological study of 35 cases of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995; 58(2): 160–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34(7): 939–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1991; 82: 239–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Petersen RC. Normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurologist 1995; 1: 326–44

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mortel KF, Meyer JS. Lack of postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of dementia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1995; 7(3): 334–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Skoog I. The relationship between blood pressure and dementia: a review. Biomed Pharmacother 1997; 51(9): 367–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Prince MJ, Bird AS, Blizard RA, et al. Is the cognitive function of older patients affected by antihypertensive treatment? Results from 54 months of the Medical Research Council’s trial of hypertension in older adults [see comments]. BMJ 1996; 312(7034): 801–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators [see comments]. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 350(9080): 757–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, et al. Prevention of dementia in randomised double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 352: 1347–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Meyer JS, Judd BW, Tawaklna T, et al. Improved cognition after control of risk factors for multi-infarct dementia. JAMA 1986; 256(16): 2203–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Meyer JS, Rogers RL, McClintic K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of daily aspirin therapy in multi-infarct dementia. A pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37(6): 549–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Lechner H. Status of treatment of vascular dementia. Neuroepidemiology 1998; 17(1): 10–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Rother M, Erkinjuntti T, Roessner M, et al. Propentofylline in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Dementia Geriatr Cogn Disord 1998; 9 Suppl. 1: 36–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Knezevic S,Labs KH, Kittner B, et al. The treatment of vascular dementia: problems and prospects. In: Prohovnik I, Wade J, Knezevic S, et al., editors. Vascular dementia: current concepts. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996: 301–12

    Google Scholar 

  75. Pantoni L, Carosi M, Amigoni S, et al. A preliminary open trial with nimodipine in patients with cognitive impairment and leukoaraiosis. Clin Neuropharmacol 1996; 19(6): 497–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Görtelmeyer R, Erbler H. Memantine in treatment of mild to moderate dementia syndrome. Drug Res 1992; 904–12

    Google Scholar 

  77. Schmage N, Bergener M. Global rating, symptoms, behaviour, and cognitive performance as indicators of efficacy in clinical studies with nimodipine in elderly patients with cognitive impairment syndromes. Int Psychogeriatr 1992; 4 Suppl. 1: 89–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Rossi R, Inzitari D, Pantoni L, et al. Nimodipine in subcortical vascular dementia trial. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999. In press

  79. Pearsons CG, Danysz W, Quack G. Memantine is a clinically well tolerated NMDA receptor antagonist — a review of preclinical data. Neuropharmacology. In press

  80. Winblad B, Poritis N. Clinical improvement in a placebo-controlled trial with memantine in care-dependent patients with severe dementia [abstract]. Neurobiol Aging 1998; 19(Suppl. 4): S303

    Google Scholar 

  81. Winblad B, Poritis N. Memantine in severe dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1999. In press

  82. Möebius H-J. Pharmacologic rationale for memantine in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, especially vascular dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999. In press

  83. Mielke R, Möller H-J, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Propentofylline in the treatment of vascular dementia and Alzheimer-type dementia: overview of phase I and phase II clinical trials. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998; 12 Suppl. 2: S29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Kittner B, Rossner M, Rother M. Clinical trials in dementia with propentofylline. Ann NY Acad Sci 1997; 826: 307–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Rother M, Kittner B, Rudolphi K, et al. HWA 285 (propentofylline) — a new compound for the treatment of both vascular dementia and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Ann NY Acad Sci 1996; 777: 404–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Pischel T. Long-term-efficacy and safety of propentofylline in patients with vascular dementia. Results of a 12 months placebo-controlled trial [abstract]. Neurobiol Aging 1998; 19(Suppl. 4): S182

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kittner B, for the European/Canadian Propentofylline Study Group. Clinical trials of propentofylline in vascular dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999. In press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Erkinjuntti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erkinjuntti, T. Cerebrovascular Dementia. CNS Drugs 12, 35–48 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199912010-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199912010-00004

Keywords

Navigation