Abstract
Researchers must often make assumptions about the efficacy of an intervention in a target population without the benefit of trial data specific to that population. Such assumptions may be particularly tenuous with models of vaccination strategies, since the distribution of pathogen strains in target populations may differ substantially from the strain distributions in trial sites. We describe a technique for projecting expected vaccine efficacy in settings where applying unadjusted trial-based efficacy data may overestimate the benefits of immunization. This simple method uses data describing setting-specific strain distributions of pathogens and strain-specific vaccine efficacies to generate a weighted overall efficacy. An example of estimating the expected efficacy of a new rotavirus vaccine in India is used to illustrate the technique. The method is shown to perform very well in a validation population for whom actual efficacy had been observed and can therefore aid those in the international health community in determining the optimal uses of scarce resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Glass R, Parashar U, Bresee J, et al. Rotavirus vaccines: current prospects and future challenges. Lancet 2006 Jul 22; 368: 323–32
Salinas B, Perez Schael I, Linhares AC, et al. Evaluation of safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of an attenuated rotavirus vaccine, RIX4414: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Latin American infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005 Sep; 24 (9): 807–16
Ruiz-Palacios GM, Perez-Schael I, Velazquez FR, et al. Safety and efficacy of an attenuated vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. N Engl J Med 2006 Jan 5; 354 (1): 11–22
Vesikari T, Karvonen A, Puustinen L, et al. Efficacy of RIX4414 live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in Finnish infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004 Oct; 23 (10): 937–43
Parashar UD, Glass RI. Public health: progress toward rotavirus vaccines. Science 2006 May 12; 312 (5775): 851–2
Glass RI, Bresee JS, Turcios R, et al. Rotavirus vaccines: targeting the developing world. J Infect Dis 2005 Sep 1; 192 Suppl. 1: S160–6
Santos N, Hoshino Y. Global distribution of rotavirus serotypes/genotypes and its implication for the development and implementation of an effective rotavirus vaccine. Rev Med Virol 2005 Jan–Feb; 15 (1): 29–56
Fischer TK, Anh DD, Antil L, et al. Health care costs of diarrheal disease and estimates of the cost-effectiveness of rotavims vaccination in Vietnam. J Infect Dis 2005 Nov 15; 192 (10): 1720–6
Podewils LJ, Antil L, Hummelman E, et al. Projected cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination for children in Asia. J Infect Dis 2005 Sep 1; 192 Suppl. 1: S133–45
Rose J, Molnar R, Watts B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a rotavims vaccination program in India [poster presentation]. Society for Medical Decision Making Annual Meeting; 2006 Oct 15; Cambridge (MA) [online]. Available at URL: http://smdm.confex.com/smdm/2006ma/techprogram/p3094.htm [Accessed 2008 Feb 2]
Jain V, Das BK, Bhan MK, et al. Great diversity of group A rotavims strains and high prevalence of mixed rotavirus infections in India. J Clin Microbiol 2001 Oct; 39 (10): 3524–9
Jit M, Edmunds WJ. Evaluating rotavirus vaccination in England and Wales: part II. The potential cost-effectiveness of vaccination. Vaccine 2007 May 16; 25 (20): 3971–9
Bilcke J, Beutels P, De Smet F, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination of Belgian infants [KCE reports; 54C]. Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://kce.fgov.be/index_en.aspx?ID=0&SGREF=9152&CREF=9409 [Accessed 2008 Feb 8]
Centers for Disease Control. Update: global rotavirus laboratory network. Rotavirus Surveillance News 2006; 1 (4): 1–2
Jaffe S. New rotavirus vaccines on the horizon. Scientist 2005; 19 (3): 37–9
Araujo EC, Clemens SA, Oliveira CS, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of two doses of RIX4414 live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in healthy infants. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007 May–Jun; 83 (3): 217–24
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.
M.E. Singer conceived the original idea for the manuscript. J. Rose and M.E. Singer developed the idea. J. Rose performed the literature review and wrote the text of the manuscript with significant input from M.E. Singer. Both authors reviewed and approved the final version.
J. Rose received support from a Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) institutional training grant during the preparation of the manuscript. No direct funding was received for the project.
AHRQ played no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, J., Singer, M.E. Projecting Vaccine Efficacy. Pharmacoeconomics 26, 185–189 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826030-00003
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826030-00003