Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Pharmaceutical Prior Authorisation Policies

A Systematic Review of the Literature

  • Review Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Policies consisting of or including prior authorisation (PA) of pharmaceutical prescriptions have been increasingly implemented by public and private insurers in the last decade, especially in the US, in order to control drug spending. We conducted a systematic review of published articles determining the effects of these policies on drug use, healthcare utilisation, healthcare expenditures and health outcomes.

A literature search was carried out in the electronic databases PubMed (which includes MEDLINE), EconLit, Web of Science and online sources including Google Scholar, from 1 January 1985 to 12 September 2006. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also searched. Peer-reviewed studies that provided empirical results about the impact of pharmaceutical PA policies, including randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, repeated measures studies, interrupted time series analyses and before-and-after studies were included.

Use of, and expenditure on, directly affected drugs per patient, and overall drug expenditure, significantly decreased after PA implementation, or increased after PA removal. Health outcome changes attributed to PA policies were not directly evaluated. In most cases, except for cimetidine, PA implementation was not associated with significant changes in the utilisation of other medical services. Although the literature indicates a reduction in drug expenditure and a nonnegative impact on use of other health services, policy recommendations still require improved study designs, and evidence cannot be easily transferred from one setting to another. The evidence still remains mainly limited to US Medicaid settings and to a small number of drug classes. There is a lack of consideration of implications of PA policies as heterogeneous interventions, outcome measurements require improvement, and there is a notable lack of evidence of medium-and long-term policy effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD. OECD health data 2006: statistics and indicators for 30 countries. Paris: OECD, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kozma CM, Schulz RM, Dickson WM, et al. Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 1993; 4: 187–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll NV. How effectively do managed care organizations influence prescribing and dispensing decisions? Am J Manag Care 2002; 8: 1041–1054

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamel MB, Epstein AM. Prior authorization programs for controlling drug spending. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2156–2158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneeweiss S, Maclure M, Carleton B, et al. Clinical and economic consequences of a reimbursement restriction of nebulised respiratory therapy in adults: direct comparison of randomised and observational evaluations. BMJ 2004; 328 (7439): 560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soumerai SB. Benefits and risks of increasing restrictions on access to costly drugs in Medicaid. Health Aff 2004; 23: 135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haga A, Sverre JM. Pricing and reimbursement of pharmaceuticals in Norway. Eur J Health Econ 2002; 3: 215–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen KM. Pricing and reimbursement of drugs in Denmark. Eur J Health Econ 2003; 4: 60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rochaix L. De la Diffculte d’un Arbitrage entre Interet Collectif et Interets Individuels: un Dilemme de plus pour le Medecin. Journal d’Economie Medicale 1987; 4: 223–243

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rochaix L. The physician as perfect agent: a comment. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 355–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blomqvist A. The doctor as double agent: information asymmetry, health insurance, and medical care. J Health Econ 1991; 10: 411–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Howard RC. The sentinel effect in an outpatient managed care setting. Prof Psychol Res Pr 1998; 29 (3): 262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hernandez C, Casas A, Escarrabill J, et al. Home hospitalisation of exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 58–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stuart B, Doshi JA, Briesacher B, et al. Impact of prescription coverage on hospital and physician costs: a case study of medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 1688–1699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenberg FR, Virabhak S. Pharmaceutical embodied technical progress, longevity, and quality of life: drugs as’ equipment for your health’ [working paper 9351]. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 2002

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham PJ. Medicaid cost containment and access to prescription drugs. Health Aff 2005; 24: 780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Risser JA, Vash PD, Nieto L. Does prior authorization of sibutramine improve medication compliance or weight loss? Obes Res 2005; 13: 86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyer CM, Phipps R, Cooper D, et al. Pharmacy benefit forecast for a new interferon beta-1a for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: development of a first-line decision tool for pharmacy-budget planning using administrative claims data. J Manag Care Pharm 2003; 9: 168–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stacey J, Shaw E, Arledge MD, et al. Pharmacoeconomics modeling of prior-authorization intervention for COX-2 specific inhibitors in a 3-tier copay plan. J Manag Care Pharm 2003; 9: 327–334

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wertheimer AI, Santella TM. Effect of prior authorization and formulary limitation in community pharmacy practice and profitability. Drug Benefit Trends 2006; January: 36–49

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacKinnon NJ, Kumar R. Prior authorization programs: a critical review of the literature. J Manag Care Pharm 2001; 7: 297–302

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bloom BS, Jacobs J. Cost effects of restricting cost-effective therapy. Med Care 1985; 23: 872–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carroll NV, Smith JC, Berringer RA, et al. Evaluation of an automated system for prior authorization: a COX-2 inhibitor example. Am J Manag Care 2006; 12: 501–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Delate T, Mager DE, Sheth J, et al. Clinical and financial outcomes associated with a proton pump inhibitor prior-authorization program in a Medicaid population. Am J Manag Care 2005; 11: 29–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer MA, Schneeweiss S, Avorn J, et al. Medicaid prior-authorization programs and the use of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2187–2194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gleason PP, Williams C, Hrdy S, et al. Medical and pharmacy expenditures after implementation of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor prior authorization program. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 25: 924–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hartung DM, Touchette DR, Ketchum KL, et al. Effects of a prior-authorization policy for celecoxib on medical service and prescription drug use in a managed care Medicaid population. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 1518–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kahan NR, Chinitz DP, Waitman DA, et al. When gatekeepers meet the sentinel: the impact of a prior authorization requirement for cefuroxime on the prescribing behaviour of community-based physicians. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 61: 341–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kotzan JA, McMillan JA, Jankel CA, et al. Initial impact of a Medicaid prior authorization program for NSAID prescriptions. J Res Pharmaceut Econ 1993; 5: 25–41

    Google Scholar 

  30. McCombs JS, Shi L, Stimmel GL, et al. A retrospective analysis of the revocation of prior authorization restrictions and the use of antidepressant medications for treating major depressive disorder. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 1939–1959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Momani AA, Madhavan SS, Nau DP. Impact of NSAIDs prior authorization policy on patients’ QoL. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36: 1686–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Phillips CR, Larson LN. Evaluating the operational performance and financial effects of a drug prior authorization program. J Manag Care Pharm 1997; 3: 699–706

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roughead EE, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D, et al. Differential effect of early or late implementation of prior authorization policies on the use of Cox II inhibitors. Med Care 2006; 44: 378–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smalley WE, Griffin MR, Fought RL, et al. Effect of a priorauthorization requirement on the use of nonsteroidal antiin-flammatory drugs by Medicaid patients. N Engl J Med 1995; 15: 1612–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Virabhak S, Shinogle JA. Physicians’ prescribing responses to a restricted formulary: the impact of Medicaid preferred drug lists in Illinois and Louisiana. Am J Manag Care 2005; 11: SP14–SP20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kotzan JA, Perri M III, Martin BC. Assessment of Medicaid prior-approval policies on prescription expenditures: market-share analysis of Medicaid and cash prescriptions. J Manag Care Pharm 1996; 2: 651–656

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lexchin J. Effects of restrictive formularies in the ambulatory care setting. Am J Manag Care 2001; 8: 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huskamp HA. Pharmaceutical cost management and access to psychotropic drugs: the US context. Int J Law Psychiatry 2005; 28: 484–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. White AC Jr, Atmar RL, Wilson J, et al. Effects of requiring prior authorization for selected antimicrobials: expenditures, susceptibilities, and clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25: 230–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Feldman SR, Fleischer AB, Chen GJ. Is prior authorization of topical tretinoin for acne cost effective? Am J Manag Care 1999; 5: 457–463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fischer MA, Cheng H, Schneeweiss S, et al. Prior authorization policies for selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in Medicaid (a policy review). Med Care 2006; 4: 658–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments from Salvador Peiró, Paloma Fernández-Cano and two anonymous referees. Financial support is acknowledged from Merck, Sharp and Dohme de España S.A. and the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science under grant SEC2003-00036. The authors also benefited from support by way of an unrestricted educational grant from the Merck Company Foundation, the philanthropic arm of Merck & Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.

All authors declare that the funding sources did not play any role in the development of the article. The authors have no financial or other conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaume Puig-Junoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puig-Junoy, J., Moreno-Torres, I. Impact of Pharmaceutical Prior Authorisation Policies. Pharmacoeconomics 25, 637–648 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200725080-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200725080-00002

Keywords

Navigation