Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Usefulness of the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality-of-Life (ADDQoL) Questionnaire in Patients with Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Country

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Asia will be at the forefront of the current epidemic of diabetes mellitus. Quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome measure in the assessment of diabetes care. However, few QOL instruments are culturally suitable for use in Asian countries. The Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality-of-Life (ADDQoL) questionnaire is a third-generation individualised QOL instrument. Individualised instruments such as the ADDQoL have the potential to be useful and less costly alternatives to computerised adaptive testing (CAT), which may not be practical in developing countries.

Objective: To evaluate and validate the ADDQoL questionnaire in Englishspeaking patients with diabetes in Singapore, a multi-ethnic Asian country.

Methods: The ADDQoL and EQ-5D were administered to English-speaking respondents with type 1 or 2 diabetes (aged ≥18 years) recruited from a tertiary acute-care referral hospital by convenience sampling. The usefulness of the key design features of the ADDQoL were assessed by measuring the number of zeroimportance responses, the change in item ranking with and without weighting for importance, and the frequency of utilisation of the ‘not applicable’ (NA) options. The acceptability, factor structure and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) of the ADDQoL were also assessed. Data were subjected to unforced factor analysis with oblimin rotation and then the condition was set to force a one-factor solution.

The validity of the ADDQoL was tested with the following hypotheses: those with moderate or severe problems on the EQ-5D would have worse ADDQoL average weighted impact (AWI) scores than those with a perfect health rating on the EQ-5D; those with better Present QOL scores on the ADDQoL would have better EQ-5D utility and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores; on the ADDQoL, AWI scores would correlate better with diabetes-dependent QOL than with Present QOL scores; and female respondents, those who required insulin or had longer duration of known diabetes would have worse ADDQoL AWI scores (known-group validity).

Results: We analysed data from 152 respondents (49% Chinese, 34% Indian; 45% female; mean age 52 years, range 18–80; mean duration of known diabetes 10 years, range 0–62). There were few missing data. Weighted scoring and NA options were shown to be necessary, thus supporting the usefulness of individualised health-related QOL measures. Factor structure of the ADDQoL was supported and internal consistency was high (α = 0.94). All hypotheses were fulfilled except for one that was partially fulfilled; respondents with longer duration of known diabetes did not report worse ADDQoL AWI scores.

Conclusions: The ADDQoL is culturally appropriate, valid, reliable and well accepted among Singaporean patients with diabetes. Individualised measures such as the ADDQoL allow one to obtain precise score estimates and may offer developing countries a useful alternative to CAT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The ADDQoL may be obtained from the developer and copyright holder, Clare Bradley, Professor of Health Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 OEX, UK, c.bradley@rhul.ac.uk.

References

  1. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 1998 Sep; 21 (9): 1414–1431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations [online]. Available from URL: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2002/wpp2002wc.htm [Accessed 2004 Aug 15]

  3. Zhang GC. Migration of highly skilled Chinese to Europe: trends and perspective. Int Migr 2003; 41 (3): 73–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan RM. The significance of quality of life in health care. Qual Life Res 2003; 12 Suppl. 1: 3–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hart HE, Bilo HJ, Redekop WK, et al. Quality of life of patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Qual Life Res 2003 Dec; 12 (8): 1089–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Polonsky WH. Emotional and quality-of-life aspects of diabetes management. Curr Diab Rep 2002 Apr; 2 (2): 153–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley C, Speight J. Patient perceptions of diabetes and diabetes therapy: assessing quality of life. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2002 Sep–Oct; 18 Suppl. 3: S64–S69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koopmanschap M, CODE-2 Advisory Board. Coping with type II diabetes: the patient’s perspective. Diabetologia 2002 Jul; 45 (7), 518–522

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hornquist JO, Wikby A, Stenstrom U, et al. Type II diabetes and quality of life: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 8 Suppl. 1: 12–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 1999 May–Jun; 15 (3): 205–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BN. Evidence for the validity of the short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing 1994 May; 23 (3): 182–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thumboo J, Chan SP, Machin D, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in Singapore: normal values for the English and Chinese SF-36 health survey. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002 May; 31 (3): 366–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lam CL, Lauder II. The impact of chronic diseases on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of Chinese patients in primary care. Fam Pract 2000 Apr; 17 (2): 159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Choe MA, Padilla GV, Chae YR, et al. Quality of life for patients with diabetes in Korea: I. The meaning of health-related quality oflife. Int J Nurs Stud 2001 Dec; 38 (6): 673–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X, Matsuda N, Ma H, et al. Comparative study of quality of life between the Chinese and Japanese adolescent populations. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000 Apr; 54 (2): 147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 1998 May; 7 (4): 323–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual Life Res 2003 Dec; 12 (8): 935–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bessette L, Sangha O, Kuntz KM, et al. Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care 1998 Apr; 36 (4): 491–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989 Mar; 27 (3 Suppl.): S217–S232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, et al. The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Qual Life Res 1999; 8 (1–2): 79–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990 Dec; 16 (3): 199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997 Nov; 35 (11): 1095–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Qual Life Res 2003 Feb; 12 (1): 87–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, et al. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998; 316 (7133): 736–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gandek B, Ware Jr JR. Methods for validating and nanning translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 Nov; 51 (11): 953–959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Redekop WK, Koopmanschap MA, Stolk RP, et al. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002 Mar; 25 (3): 458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Coffey IT, Brandle M, Zhou H, et al. Valuing health-related quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002 Dec; 25 (12): 2238–2243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health 2004 Jan–Feb; 7 (1): 79–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chong LY, Neo SB, Tan AL, et al. A comparison of asthma knowledge and medication compliance between general clinic and specialist clinic [abstract]. Proceedings of the 14th Singapore Pharmacy Congress and 9th Pan Pacific Conference; 2000 Aug 6; Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  30. Singapore Department of Statistics. Literacy and language. In: Census of Population 2000 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.singstat.gov.sg/keystats/c2000/literacy.pdf [Accessed 2005 Nov 9]

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Peter Eng, Director of the Diabetes Centre, and the nurses and staff at the Diabetes Centre, Singapore General Hospital for their invaluable contributions to the study. We would also like to thank Associate Professor Julian Thumboo, Senior Consultant, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

All authors participated in the concept and design of the study. H.L. Wee performed the statistical analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

There are no potential conflicts of interest and no sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, 18 Science Drive 4, Republic of Singapore

    Hwee-Lin Wee &  Shu-Chuen Li

  2. Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

    Chee-Eng Tan & Su-Yen Goh

Authors
  1. Hwee-Lin Wee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chee-Eng Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Su-Yen Goh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shu-Chuen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Chuen Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wee, HL., Tan, CE., Goh, SY. et al. Usefulness of the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality-of-Life (ADDQoL) Questionnaire in Patients with Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Country. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 673–682 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624070-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624070-00006

Keywords

Search

Navigation