Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-utility analysis of survival with epoetin-alfa versus placebo in stage IV breast cancer

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: In a multinational trial of anaemic patients with cancer receiving nonplatinum-containing chemotherapy, epoetin-alfa effectively increased haemoglobin levels, reduced red blood cell transfusion requirements, and improved QOL. Although the study was not designed or powered to evaluate survival, a survival trend was noted favouring epoetin-alfa compared with placebo (median survival 17 vs 11 months [p = 0.126]).

Objectives: To determine the incremental cost utility of epoetin-alfa versus placebo in anaemic patients with stage IV breast cancer from a UK National Health Service perspective.

Methods: Patient data regarding transfusions, epoetin-alfa usage, chemotherapy treatment cycles, and adverse events were recorded, with survival follow-up for 12–36 months post-study. Stage IV breast cancer therapy costs were collected by surveying UK oncologists, and utilities for associated health states were from published sources. Costs were in British pounds and year 2000 values. Costs and benefits were jointly determined for the stage IV breast cancer subgroup (n = 55). Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were calculated assuming a 6% annual discount rate for costs and a 1.5% annual discount rate for benefits. Bootstrap simulations (10 000 iterations) were conducted to account for uncertainty, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to establish robustness.

Results: The ICUR for epoetin-alfa treatment was £8851 per QALY, with a 99% probability of a positive net benefit in QALYs (net benefit = 0.4805 years of perfect life) and a 94% probability of being acceptable using a threshold ICUR of £30 000/QALY. The main cost drivers distinguishing epoetin-alfa from placebo were the costs of drug and patient care due to increased survival.

Conclusions: The available data suggest a high probability of favourable costutility outcomes with epoetin-alfa treatment for anaemia in patients with stage IV breast cancer receiving nonplatinum-containing chemotherapy. Additional studies are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Fig. 2
Table III
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table IV
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Groopman JE, Itri LM. Chemotherapy-induced anemia in adults: incidence and treatment. J Nall Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1616–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett-Lee PJ, Bailey NP, O’Brien ME, et al. Large-scale UK audit of blood transfusion requirements and anaemia in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 93–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coiffier B, Guastalla JP, Pujade-Lauraine E, et al., for the Anemia Study Group. Predicting cancer-associated anaemia in patients receiving non-platinum chemotherapy: results of a retrospective survey. Fur J Cancer 2001; 37: 1617–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Littlewood TJ. The impact of hemoglobin levels on treatment outcomes in patients with cancer. Semin Oncol 2001; 28 (8 Suppl.): 49–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cella D, Mo F, Peterman A. Anemia, fatigue and quality of life in people with cancer and HIV infection [abstract 571]. Blood 1996; 88 (1 Suppl.): 146a

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cella D. Factors influencing quality of life in cancer patients: anemia and fatigue. Semin Oncol 1998; 25 (7 Suppl.): 43–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ludwig H, Strasser K. Symptomatology of anemia. Semin Oncol 2001; 28 (8 Suppl.): 7–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Albain KS, Crowley JJ, LeBlanc M, et al. Survival determinants in extensive-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: the Southwest Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1618–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohlhauser C, Büllzebruck H, Ebert W, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a multivariate regression analysis of 456 patients with radiotherapy. Onkologie 1997; 20: 126–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Molls M, Stadler P, Becker A, et al. Relevance of oxygen in radiation oncology: mechanisms of action, correlation to low hemoglobin levels. Strahlenther Onkol 1998; 174 (4 Suppl.): 13–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grogan M, Thomas GM, Melamed I, et al. The importance of hemoglobin levels during radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 1999; 86: 1528–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Glaser CM, Millesi W, Kornek GV, et al. Impact of hemoglobin level and use of recombinant erythropoietin on efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for squamous cell carci noma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50: 705–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Waters IS, O’Brien ME, Ashley S. Management of anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy [letter]. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 601–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caro JJ, Salas M, Ward A, et al. Anemia as an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer: a systemic, quantitative review. Cancer 2001; 91: 2214–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leitgeb C, Pecherstorfer M, Fritz E, et al. Quality of life in chronic anemia of cancer during treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin. Cancer 1994; 73: 2535–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Glaspy J, Bukowski R, Steinberg D, et al., for the Procrit Study Group. Impact of therapy with epoetin alfa on clinical outcomes in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies during cancer chemotherapy in community oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 1218–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Demetri GD, Kris M, Wade J, et al., for the Procrit Study Group. Quality-of-life benefit in chemotherapy patients treated with epoetin alfa is independent of disease response or tumor type: results from a prospective community oncology study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3412–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dammacco F, Castoldi G, Rödjer S. Efficacy of epoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemia of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2001; 113: 172–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gabrilove JL, Cleeland CS, Livingston RB, et al. Clinical evaluation of once-weekly dosing of epoetin alfa in chemo-therapy patients: improvements in hemoglobin and quality of life are similar to three-times-weekly dosing. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2875–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Littlewood TJ, Bajetta E, Nortier JW, et al., for the Epoetin Alfa Study Group. Effects of epoetin alfa on hematologic parameters and quality of life in cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2865–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parmar MKB, Machin D. Survival analysis: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gagnon DD, Martin SC, van Hout B. Comparing mean versus median survival as a prelude to cost-effectiveness (CIE) analy-ses [abstract]. Value Health 2001; 4: 85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA). The Health service financial database 1999. London: CIPFA/HFM, Institute of Public Finance, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  24. Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). Netten A, Curtis L, editors. Unit costs of health and social care 2000. Canterbury: University of Kent at Canterbury, 2000

  25. MEDTAP unit cost database. London: MEDTAP International Inc, 2001

  26. Bristish national formulary, no. 40. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2000

  27. Etzioni R, Urban N, Baker M. Estimating the costs attributable to a disease with application to ovarian cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 95–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin DY, Feuer EJ, Etzioni R, et al. Estimating medical costs from incomplete follow-up data. Biometrics 1997; 53: 419–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Taplin SH, Barlow W, Urban N, et al. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Nall Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 417–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fireman BH, Quesenberry CP, Somkin CP, et al. Cost of care for cancer in a health maintenance organization. Health Care Financ Rev 1997; 18: 51–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Varney SJ, Guest JF. The annual cost of blood in the UK. J Transfus Med 2003; 13: 205–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown RE, Hutton J, Burrell A. Cost effectiveness of treatment options in advanced breast cancer in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19 (11): 1091–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance for manufacturers and sponsors. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  34. Protocol EPO-C111-457/EPO-INT-10. A double-blind, place-bo-controlled study to assess the effect of early intervention and/or treatment with epoetin alfa on anemia in cancer patients receiving non-platinum containing chemotherapy. New Jersey: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC., 2003 (Data on file)

  35. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. Estimation of a preferencebased measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21: 271–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Briggs AIL, O’Brien BJ. The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ 2001; 10: 179–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Briggs A, Tambour M. The design and analysis of stochastic cost-effectiveness studies for the evaluation of health care interventions. Drug Inf J 2001; 35: 1455–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Black WC. The CE plane: a graphic representation of cost-effectiveness. Med Decis Making 1990; 10: 212–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. van Hout BA, Al MJ, Gordon GS, et al. Costs, effects and C/Eratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ 1994; 3: 309–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sheffield R, Sullivan SD, Saltiel E, et al. Cost comparison of recombinant human erythropoietin and blood transfusion in cancer chemotherapy-induced anemia. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31: 15–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Barosi G, Marchetti M, Liberato NL. Cost-effectiveness of recombinant human erythropoietin in the prevention of chemo-therapy-induced anaemia. Br J Cancer 1998; 78: 781–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cremieux PY, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER, et al. Cost effectiveness, quality-adjusted life-years and supportive care. Recombinant human erythropoietin as a treatment of cancer-associated anaemia. Pharmacoeconomics 1999; 16 (Pt 1): 459–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a research grant from Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C., Raritan, NJ, USA.

The authors gratefully acknowledge MEDTAP International, Inc. (London, UK) for conducting the physician survey that yielded the cost data for each treatment phase of stage IV breast cancer used in the analyses.

Silas Martin, Dennis Gagnon and Lucy Zhang are employees of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC. Ben van Hout is a paid consultant of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silas C. Martin.

Appendix

Appendix

The following investigators participated in the clinical study: Belgium: Yves Beguin, MD, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liege; Rene Brys, MD, H. Hart Klinick, Ecklo; Gilbert De Wasch, MD, Henri Serruys Hospital, Oostende; Mario Antonio Dicato, MD, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg; Raymond Mathys, MD, A.Z. Middelheim, Antwerpen; M. Symann, MD, Oncologie Médicale, Cliniques St Luc, Brussels; Achiel Van Hoof, MD, Algemeen Ziekenhuis St Jan, Brugge; and Ignace Vergote, MD, U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Leuven. Czech Republic: Otakar Bednarik, MD, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno; Michael Frank, MD, Department of Radiotherapy, Faculty Hospital, Plzen; and Milada Zemanova, MD, Veobecná Fakultni Nemocnice UK, Praha 2. France: Pierre-Etienne Cailleux, MD, Service de Radiotherapie/Chimiotherapie, Tours; Herve Cure, MD, Centre Regional de Lutte, Contre le Cancer Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; Marine Divine, MD, Hospital Henri Mondor, Creteil; Jean-Paul Guastalla, MD, Centre Regional de Lutte, Contre le Cancer Leon Berard, Lyon; M. Faress Husseini, MD, Hospital Pasteur, Hospitaux Civils Colmar, Colmar; and Hervé Lacroix, MD, CHU-Hospital Laennec, Service D’Oncologie Generale, Nantes. Germany: Gerhard Adam, MD, Asklepios Klinik Triberg, Triberg; Konstantin Akrivakis, MD, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin; Carsten Bokemeyer, MD, Medizinische Universitätsklinik Abt. II, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen; Lothar Böning, MD, Onkologische Praxisgemeinschaft, München; Mathias Freund, MD, Abteilung Hämatologic/Onkologic, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Rostock; Hans-Jürgen Hurtz, MD, Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Halle; Hartmut Kirchner, MD, Siloa Hospital, Clinic for Hematology and Oncology, Hannover; Erhard Kurschel, MD, Gemeinschaftspraxis, Oberhausen; Wolf- Dieter Ludwig, MD, Virchow-Klinikum, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Berlin; Norbert Marschner, MD, Praxis in der Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Freiburg; Karl Ulrich Petry, MD, Frauenklinik der MHH, Hannover; Uwe Reinhardt, MD, Klinikum Bayreuth, Abteilung Onkologie, Bayreuth; Peter Reitzig, MD, Humaine Klinik, Dresden; and Wolfgang Schuette, MD, City Hospital Martha-Maria, Hämatologie, Halle. Greece: Vassilis Georgoulias, MD, University Hospital of Heraklion, Department of Clinical Oncology, Heraklion, Crete; Gerasimos Pangalis, MD, Laikon General Hospital, Athens; Nicholas Pavlidis, MD, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina; and Dimostenis-Vasilios Skarlos, MD, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens. Hungary: Tamás Pintér, MD, Petz Aladár County Hospital, Gyõr, Department Oncoradiology, Gyõr; Gyula Szegedi, MD, Debrecen University Medical School, Third Department for Internal Medicine, Debrecen; and Gyula Varga, MD, Albert Szent-Gyocrgyi Med. University Szeged, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Szeged. Ireland: John Rory O’Donnell, MD, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin. Italy: Emilio Bajetta, MD, Instituto Nazionale Per Lo Studio E La Cura dei Tumori, Milan; Agostino Cortelezzi, MD, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Ospedale Policlinico, Cattedra Di Ematologia, Milan; and Gabriella Gorzegno, MD, Osperdale S. Luigi, Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale, Orbassano (Torino). The Netherlands: Franciscus L.G. Erdkamp, MD, Maaslandziekenhuis, Sittard; H.J. Keizer, MD, Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden, Leiden; J.J. Mol, MD, Ziekenenhuis Rijnstate, Arnhem; Johan W.R. Nortier, MD, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht; Ron C. Rietbrock, MD, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam; C.J. Rodenburg, MD, Algemeen Christelijk Ziekenhuis Eemland, Lokatie De Lichtenberg, Amersfoort; M.R. Schaafsma, MD, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede; L.H. Siegenbeek van Heukclom, MD, Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Alkmaar; C. van der Heul, MD, Sint Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg; Marinus Van Marwijk Kooy, MD, St Sophia Ziekenhuis, Zwolle; Gerard Vreugdenhil, MD, Sint Joseph Ziekenhuis, Veldhoven; and Jacques Wils, MD, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond. Poland: Jerzy Holowiecki, MD, Department of Haematology, Silesian School of Medicine, Katowice; Marek Pawlicki, MD, Maria Skiodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Division in Cracow, Kraków; and Piotr Siedlecki, MD, Maria Skiodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Warszawa. Portugal: Cândida Azevedo, MD, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Porto; Ricardo Marques da Costa, MD, Hospital Dristrital de Leiria, Leiria; and Joaquim Gouveia, MD, Hospital de Santo António dos Capuchos, Lisboa. South Africa: Dayle Hacking, MD, Durban Oncology Center, Westridge, Durban; Johann Raats, MD, 110 Dmar Medical Center, Capetown; and Bernardo Rapoport, MD, The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Johannesburg. Switzerland: Matti S. Aapro, MD, Centre Anticancéreux, Genolier; Richard Herrmann, MD, Kantonspital Basel, Basel; J.M. Lüthi, MD, Regionalspital Thun, Thun; and Kaspar Rhyner, MD, Kantonspital Glarus, Glarus. United Kingdom: Peter Jeffrey Barrett-Lee, MD, Department of Oncology, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff; David Fairlamb, MD, New Cross Hospital, Ceansly Center, Wolverhampton; Riaz Jan-Mohamed, MD, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge; Timothy James Littlewood, MD, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; Graham Smith, MD, Royal United Hospital, Bath; and John Sweetenham, MD, Southampton General Hospital, CRC Oncology Unit, Southampton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, S.C., Gagnon, D.D., Zhang, L. et al. Cost-utility analysis of survival with epoetin-alfa versus placebo in stage IV breast cancer. Pharmacoeconomic 21, 1153–1169 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200321160-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200321160-00002

Keywords

Navigation