Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applications of Economic Models in Healthcare

The Introduction of Pioglitazone in Sweden

  • Review Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common disorder that is estimated to affect approximately 100 million people worldwide. Forecasts have suggested a substantial increase in incidence, mainly in Asia, Africa and North America. Thus, an increasing number of people with diabetes-related complications will have to be cared for in the future. This development will be a major health problem for the people affected, as well as a major health economic challenge for many countries. Thiazolidinediones represent a new class of drugs with a novel mechanism of action that addresses the root cause of T2DM. Their mode of action targets the core defect of T2DM, namely, insulin resistance. One of these drugs, pioglitazone, was recently approved by the Swedish authorities. To evaluate the cost effectiveness of this new drug, a published mathematical simulation model was used. This model was adapted to Swedish conditions, and local Swedish unit costs were put into the model. Modelling is necessary when performing economic evaluations in diabetes because of the complexity of the disease and its long time horizon. The cost-effectiveness analyses showed that the cost per life-year gained with pioglitazone combination therapy compared with current treatment ranged from 37 000 Swedish kronor (SEK) to SEK149 000. Although there is no threshold value for cost effectiveness in Sweden, the values presented would normally be regarded as cost effective in the Swedish healthcare system. Modelling studies are a good starting point, but long-term naturalistic studies are needed to establish the cost effectiveness of these new drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Table VI

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zimmet P, McCarty D. The NIDDM epidemic: global estimates and projections. IDF Bulletin 1995; 40: 8–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 1998; 21 (9): 1414–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jönsson B, Smith U. Good diabetes control is worthwhile. Lakartidningen 1997; 94 (34): 2803–4

    Google Scholar 

  4. UKPDS Group. Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998; 352: 854–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000 12; 321 (7258): 405–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jönsson B. Revealing the cost of type 2 diabetes in Europe. Diabetologia. In press 2002

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henriksson F, Jönsson B. Diabetes: the cost of illness in Sweden. J Int Med 1998; 244: 461–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Henriksson F, Agardh C-D, Berne B, et al. Direct medical costs for patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden. J Int Med 2000; 248: 387–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yearbook of health and medical care 2000. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare, 2001

  10. Axelsson R. Hälso- och sjukvårdsadministration i organisationsteoretisk belysning. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Swedish Federation of County Councils. Stockholm: Information about the County Councils, 2001

  12. National Social Insurance Board. Stockholm: National Social Insurance Board, 2000. Report no. 1999: 10

  13. National Social Insurance Board [online]. Available from: http://www.rfv.se [Accessed 2001 May 10]

  14. Palmer AJ, Weiss C, Sendi PP, et al. The cost-effectiveness of different management strategies for Type I diabetes: a Swiss perspective. Diabetologia 2000; 43: 13–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coyle D, Lee KM, O’Brien BJ. The role of models within economic analysis: focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20 Suppl. 1: 11–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. UKPDS Group. UK Prospective Diabetes Study 16. Overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. Diabetes 1995; 44: 1249–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johansen K. Efficacy of metformin in the treatment of NIDDM: meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 1999; 22 (1): 33–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DRG prices on Internet [online]. Available from http://www.spri.se/e/drg/ [Accessed 2000 Aug 12]

  19. Zethreaus N. A computer model to analyse the cost-effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy — a revised version. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics, 2000. EFI research paper: 368

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zethraeus N, Molin T, Henriksson P, et al. Costs of coronary heart disease and stroke: the case of Sweden. J Intern Med 1999; 246: 151–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Apelqvist J, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Larsson J, et al. Long-term costs for foot ulcers in diabetic patients in a multidisciplinary setting. Foot Ankle Int 1995; 16: 388–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Federation of County Councils. Cost per patient, physician visit, bed-day etc in 1996 [in Swedish]. Stockholm: Federation of County Councils, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  23. Business agreement for the South Health Care Region. Regional prices 1999 [in Swedish]. Malmö: Södra Samverkansnämnden, 1999

  24. National and regional health care in 1998 [in Swedish]. Linköping: The County Council in Östergötland, 1998

  25. Price list 1998. Inpatient care and outpatient care [in Swedish]. Uppsala: Akademiska University Hospital, 1998

  26. Price list 1998. Huddinge: Labmedicin at Huddinge University Hospital and Söder Hospital, 1998

  27. FASS. Pharmaceuticals in Sweden (Pharmaceutical lexicon) [in Swedish]. Stockholm: Läkemedelsinformation AB, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hjortsberg C, Svarvar P. Cost comparison between hospital inpatient care and advanced home care: end-stage cancer [in Swedish]. Lund: The Institute for Health Economics, 1999. IHE Working Paper 1999: 2

    Google Scholar 

  29. Statistics Sweden. Available from URL: http://www.scb.se

  30. Katz ML, Rosen HR. Microeconomics. 2nd ed. Boston: Richard D. Irwine Inc., 1994

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ralston S, Mera R, Wisner C, et al. Quality of life and treatment satisfaction of type 2 diabetic patients: the CODE-2 experience [poster no. 865]. Presented at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); 2000 Sep 21; Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  32. Newhouse JP. US and UK health economics: two disciplines separated by a common language? Health Econ 1998; 7: 79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS, et al. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal 1995; 15 (3): 369–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Peter Lindgren for help with the collection of Swedish data, Laura Kahn and Micole Reinman for administrative help and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments. The study was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Freddie Henriksson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henriksson, F. Applications of Economic Models in Healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics 20 (Suppl 1), 43–53 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220001-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220001-00005

Keywords

Navigation