Abstract
Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness (net costs per life year gained) of pneumococcal vaccination of elderly individuals aged 65 years and over in The Netherlands.
Design and setting: A pharmacoeconomic analysis was conducted from the healthcare perspective in The Netherlands. The gender- and age-specific modelling framework linked epidemiological aspects of invasive pneumococcal disease (e.g. incidence, mortality, life years lost) to vaccination and hospital resource use. To derive 90% confidence limits for net costs per life year gained a stochastic analysis was performed.
Intervention: Pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly with the 23-valent vaccine. Effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease was derived from international studies.
Main outcome measures and results: Pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly was not found to be cost saving. At baseline, stochastic and univariate sensitivity analysis net costs per life year gained were estimated to be between 6000 and 16 000 euro (EUR) [EUR1 = 1.1 US dollars; cost level 1995]. A scenario analysis on alternative age-dependent vaccination strategies indicated even higher net costs per life year gained, up to EUR28 000 for vaccinating only those elderly aged 85 years and over.
Conclusions: Pneumococcal vaccination is associated with net costs per life year gained of EUR10 100 (at baseline assumptions). These costs are higher than those for influenza vaccination (EUR5500). Our pharmacoeconomic approach, which needs to be considered in conjunction with social, psychological and budgetary issues, is intended to contribute to rational decision-making in healthcare policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hannoun C, editor. The socioeconomics of influenza and influenza vaccination in Europe. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 9 Suppl. 3: 1–81
Postma MJ, Bos JM, van Gennep M, et al. Economic evaluation of influenza vaccination: assessment for the Netherlands. Pharmacoeconomics 1999; 16 Suppl. 1: 1–100
Centers for Disease Control. Prevention of pneumococcal disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 1997; 46(RR-8): 1–24
Butler JC, Breiman RF, Campbell JF, et al. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine efficacy: an evaluation of current recommendations. JAMA 1993; 270: 1826–31
Sisk JE, Moskowitz AJ, Whang W, et al. Cost-effctiveness of vaccination against pneumococcal bacteraemia among elderly people. JAMA 1997; 16: 1333–9
Fedson DS. Pneumococcal vaccination in the United States and 20 other developed countries, 1981–1996. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1117–23
Health Council. Advies inzake Pneumococcen-immunisatie. The Hague: Gezondheidsraad, 1982
Baltussen R, Ament A, Leidl RM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia in The Netherlands. Eur J Pub Health 1997; 7: 153–61
Örtqvist Å, Hedlund J, Burman L-Å, et al. Randomized trial of 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in prevention of pneumonia in middle-aged and elderly people. Lancet 1998; 351: 399–403
Hirschmann JV, Lipsky BA. The pneumococcal vaccine after 15 years of use. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 373–7
De Neeling AJ, van Pelt W, Hol C, et al. Temporary increase in incidence of invasive infection due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in the Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 1579–80
Heijnen MLA, Dorigo-Zetsma JW, Wilbrink B, et al. Respiratoire infecties in Nederland: schatting van de incidentie van invasieve pneumokokken-infecties op basis van ISIS. Infectieziekten Bull 1998; 9: 223–5
Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics [online]. Available from: URL: http://www.cbs.nl [Accessed 2000 Dec 14]
van Ampting JMA, Bouter KP, Diepersloot RJA, et al. Pneumococcal bacteraemia: incidence, outcome and predisposing factors. Eur J Int Med 1998; 9: 145–50
Postma MJ. Assessment of the economic impact of AIDS at national and multi-national level. Thesis at the University of Maastricht [The Netherlands]. Zutphen: Koninklijke Wöhrmann bv, 1998
Rutten FFH, Van Ineveld BM, Van Ommen BM, et al. Kostenberekening bij Gezondheidszorgonderzoek; richtlijnen voor de praktijk. Utrecht: Jan van Arkel, 1993
Health Care Insurance Board. Farmacotherapeutisch kompas 1997. Amstelveen: Ziekenfondsraad, 1996
Honkanen PO, Keistinen T, Kivela SL. Reactions following administration of influenza vaccine alone or with pneumococcal vaccine to the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 205–8
Shapiro ED, Berg AT, Austrian R, et al. The protective efficacy of polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1454–60
Farr BM, Johnston BL, Cobb D, et al. Preventing pneumococcal bacteraemia in patients at risk. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 2336–40
Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis. Bacterial meningitis in The Netherlands. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 1997
Parsonage M, Neuburger H. Discounting and health benefits. Health Econ 1992; 1: 71–6
Dutch Ministry of Finance. Handboek financiële informatie en administratie rijksoverheid. The Hague: Ministry of Finance, 1996
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russel LB, et al., editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York (NY)/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996
Doubilet P, Begg CB, Weinstein MC, et al. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation. Med Decis Making 1985; 5: 157–77
Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 146: 473–81
Honkanen PO, Keistinen T, Miettinen L, et al. Incremental effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccine on simultaneously administered influenza vaccine in preventing pneumonia and pneumococcal pneumonia among persons aged 65 years and older. Vaccine 1999; 17: 2493–2500
http://www.earrs.rivm.nl [Accessed 2000 Dec 19]
Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, et al. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 2666–77
Leech JA, Gervais A, Ruben FL. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccine in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can Med Assoc J 1987; 136: 361–5
Nichol KL. The additive benefits of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations during influenza seasons among elderly persons with chronic lung disease. Vaccine 1999; 17: S91–S93
Nichol KL, Baken L, Wuorenma J, et al. The health and economic benefits associated with pneumococcal vaccination of elderly persons with chronic lung disease. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 2437–42
Postma MJ, Jager JC, Reinders A, et al. Standards for cost-effectiveness analysis: a Dutch study on influenza vaccination. Health Syst Sci 1997; 3–4: 413–24
De Graeve DD, Lombaert G, Goossens H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pneumococcal vaccination in adults and elderly persons in Belgium. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 17: 591–601
Conseil d’évaluation des technologies de la santé du Québec. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a pneumococcal immunization program in Québec. Montréal: CETS, 1999. Report No.: CETS 98-4 RE
Drummond M, Brandt A, Luce B, et al. Standardizing methodologies for economic evaluation in health care; practice, problems and potential. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1993; 9: 26–36
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the advice of J. van Ampting, MD (Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht), P.B. van den Berg PharmD (GUIDE/GRIP, Groningen), Dr G. Elzinga (RIVM), Prof. Dr J.W.M. van der Meer (Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Nijmegen), Dr A.J. de Neeling (RIVM), Dr W. van Pelt (RIVM), M.J.J.C. Poos, MSc (RIVM), Dr M.J.W. Sprenger (Healthcare Insurance Board, Amstelveen) and Prof. Dr B.A.M. van der Zeijst (RIVM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr Postma performed part of this study while employed at the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Postma, M.J., Heijnen, ML.A. & Jager, J.C. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pneumococcal Vaccination for Elderly Individuals in The Netherlands. Pharmacoeconomics 19, 215–222 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200119020-00008
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200119020-00008