Skip to main content
Log in

The Cost of Urinary Incontinence in Italian Women

A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To offer cost estimates of urinary incontinence (UI) in the general population based on prospectively collected data.

Design: We analysed individual costs in a sample of women with UI who were identified in the framework of a cross-sectional study on the prevalence of UI in women aged >40 years.

Setting: Six areas in Italy.

Intervention: Home interview.

Patients and participants: Women were identified among the patients registered with a network of general practitioners operating in each area using computer-generated random number lists.

Results: A total of 2767 women were identified. Of these, 408 (14.7%) reported UI during the year before the interview and 229 underwent a detailed interview on UI-related costs. On the basis of this information, we estimated the direct costs associated with UI from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (INHS). The lifetime cost per patient of diagnosis was 80 131 Italian lire (L) (exchange rate: $US1 = L1618). Consultations accounted for only 20% of the diagnostic cost, diagnostic tests for 36% and hospital admissions for diagnostic procedures accounted for 44%. The diagnosis cost estimate seems low, partly because several women did not request either consultations or diagnostic tests (the overall rate per patient was 0.76 for consultations and 0.39 for diagnostic tests). The only appreciable treatment cost, according to the INHS perspective, was for diapers. The annual cost per patient for diapers was L255 519. The prevalence of UI in women aged >40 years in Italy is estimated in the study at 9.3%. Thus, combining this information with the cost estimates, the annual treatment cost of UI in Italian women aged >40 years is L351 800 billion, considering diapers and drugs only.

Conclusion: This study has estimated the individual cost of UI in the general population. These figures may be useful when designing economic evaluations of UI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence. BMJ 1980; 281: 1243–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elving LB, Foldspang A, Lam GW, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of urinary incontinence in 3,100 women age 30–59. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1989; 125: 37–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Milsom I, Ekelund P, Molander U, et al. The influence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy and menopause on the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women. J Urol 1993; 149: 1459–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hergoz AR, Fultz NH. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38: 273–81

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Conor R, Johannesson M, Hass SL, et al. Urge incontinence. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 14: 531–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyman JF. The ’costs’ of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 1997; 32: 13–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu TW, Gabeiko K, Weis KA, et al. Clinical guidelines and cost implications: the case of stress urinary incontinence. Geriatr Nephrol Urol 1994; 4: 85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ballanger PH, Rischmann P. Incontinence urinaire de la femme: évaluation et traitement. Prog Urol 1995; 5: 739–63

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ekelund P, Grimby AG, Milsom I. Urinary incontinence: social and financial costs high [letter]. BMJ 1993; 306: 1344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Salvatore S, ArtibaniW, Di Benedetto P, et al. An Italian epidemiological study on urinary incontinence [abstract no. 230]. An International Continence Society (ICS) Conference; 1998 Sep 14–17; Jerusalem

  11. Italian Directory of Medicines and Manufacturers (L’Informatore Farmaceutico) Oemf. 57th ed. Milan: Oemf International, 1997

  12. Jensen JK, Nielsen R, Ostergard DR. The role of patient history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 904–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brocklehuest JC. Urinary incontinence in the community-analysis of a MORI poll. BMJ 1993; 306: 832–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu TW. Impact of urinary incontinence on health-care costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38: 292–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Callahan CM. The costs of urinary incontinence. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 6: 183–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dowell CJ, Bryant CM, Moore KH, et al. Calculating the direct costs of urinary incontinence: a new test instrument. BJU Int 1999; 83 (6): 596–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study participants from the Gruppo di Studio Incontinenzan include B. Bernardini, E. Colli, P. Di Benedetto, G. Nacci, M. Lavezzari, A. Pagliarulo, S. Salvatore, M. von Heland and W. Artibani.

The following medical or paramedical staff helped to collect the data: I. Anelli, D. Amuso, M. Camilleri, G. De Luca, M. Farano, F. Gentile, G. Gentile, G. Marmai, S. Polledri, C. Pozzi, E. Tamai, E. Tangorra and C. Valeri

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Livio Garattini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tediosi, F., Parazzini, F., Bortolotti, A. et al. The Cost of Urinary Incontinence in Italian Women. Pharmacoeconomics 17, 71–76 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200017010-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200017010-00005

Keywords

Navigation