Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate 50/250μg vs Fluticasone Propionate 250μg in Adults and Adolescents with Asthma IV: Results

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods: Results from a multicentre clinical trial were used to determine the relative cost effectiveness of a new asthma treatment combining salmeterol 50μg with fluticasone propionate (FP) 250μg in one inhaler and administered twice daily (n = 81) and FP 250μg twice daily (n = 81) in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma. The economic analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system.

Results: Treatment with the salmeterol/FP combination product (SFC) resulted in more than double the proportion of successfully treated weeks, defined as a ≥5% improvement in predicted peak expiratory flow (74.5 vs 35.1%; p < 0.00001), and significantly higher proportions of episode-free days (43.5 vs 25.2%; p = 0.0004), and symptom-free days (55.2 vs 37.1%; p = 0.0017) than treatment with FP alone. Total costs of asthma management were similar in both treatment arms [SEK20.9 ($US2.54) per patient per day in the SFC arm and SEK20.2 ($US2.45) per patient per day in the FP arm]. As a consequence, and despite higher drug acquisition costs for the combination product, the cost-effectiveness ratios for successfully treated weeks [SEK196.3 ($US23.82) vs SEK404.5 ($US49.08)], episode-free days [SEK48.1 ($US5.84) vs SEK80.1 ($US9.72)] and symptom-free days [SEK37.8 ($US4.59) vs SEK54.5 ($US6.61)] consistently favoured the SFC group. The additional costs to achieve an additional successfully treated week, symptom-free day and episode-free day were SEK12.6 ($US1.53) per patient per week, SEK3.9 ($US0.47) per patient per day and SEK3.9 ($US0.47) per patient per day, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that all outcomes were stable over a range of assumptions.

Conclusion: In summary, SFC 50/250μg was clinically more effective for a similar overall healthcare cost and was therefore more cost effective than FP 250μg in the treatment of asthma in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. NHLBI/WHO Workshop Report, January 1995

  2. Greening AP, Ind PW, Northfield M, et al. Added salmeterol versus higher-dose corticosteroid in asthma patients with symptoms on existing inhaled corticosteroid. Allen & Hanburys Limited UK Study Group. Lancet 1994; 344: 219–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolcock A, Lundbäck B, Ringdal N, et al. Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling the dose of inhaled steroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153: 1481–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pauwels RA, Lofdahl CG, Postma DS, et al. Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 337 (20): 1405–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ind PW, Dal Negro R, Colman NC, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in moderate adult asthma. I: Lung function and symptoms. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: A416

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ind PW, Dal Negro R, Colman NC, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in moderate adult asthma. II: Exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: A415

    Google Scholar 

  7. Condemi JJ, Goldstein S, Kalberg C, et al. The addition of salmeterol to fluticasone propionate versus increasing the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999; 82 (4): 383–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. White M, Shapiro G, Taylor J, et al. The salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate dry powder combination product via Diskus inhaler improves asthma control compared to the individual products in patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159 (3 Pt 2): A635

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pieters WR, Lundbäck B, Johansson G, et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma. II: Study methodologies. Pharmacoeconomics 1999; 16 Suppl. 2: 9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmqvist, M., Price, M.J. & Sondhi, S. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate 50/250μg vs Fluticasone Propionate 250μg in Adults and Adolescents with Asthma IV: Results. Pharmacoeconomics 16 (Suppl 2), 23–28 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199916002-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199916002-00004

Keywords

Navigation