Skip to main content
Log in

A New Product Pricing Model Using Intracorporate Market Perceptions to Extract the Value of Additional Information

PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: This model introduces a unique and inexpensive technique to estimate profit increases that might be expected from: (i) an additional clinical trial to establish a drug’s second clinical indication; and (ii) a survey of market demand.

Design: Microsoft Excel™ spreadsheets are used to solicit selected expert opinions about the new product’s annual market share under scenarios reflecting different pricing points, promotional expenditures and clinical advantage.

Main outcome measures and results: The preprogrammed model returns profit-maximising price, promotional expenditure and market differentiation for each expert and the group as a whole. The extent of disagreement among the experts is used to estimate the additional profits which might be expected from a clinical trial and a market survey. Results from an illustrative application indicated greater incremental profits could be expected from the survey of market demand. The clinical trial generated smaller expected incremental profits because several experts felt that the trial’s potential results would not affect the drug’s profit-maximising price.

Conclusions: With a 1-day meeting between 6 experts, the model provided a recommendation about the new product’s profit-maximising market price and promotional expenditure. Furthermore, it estimated profit increases that might be expected from additional clinical trials and a survey of market demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berndt E, Wilinsky M, Fazio A, et al. Fluconazole DUE: results empower staff pharmacists. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting; 1994 Dec 29; Miami Beach, P–169 (D)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lipsy RJ. Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 1 (4): 265–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. R&D: the key to innovation [online]. Available from: URL: (http://www.phrma.org/facts/industry/profile97/chap2.html)

  4. Coy P, Gross N, Sansoni S, et al. R&D scoreboard. Business Week 1994 Jun 27: 81–91

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bobula JD. New era in pharmaceutical pricing. J Res Pharm Econ 1996; 7 (1-2): 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lu J, Comanor WS. Strategic pricing of new pharmaceuticals. Rev Econ Stat 1998; 80 (1): 108–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolassa M. Pharmaceutical pricing at the change of the millennia. J Pharm Mark Manage 1996; 10 (2-3): 109–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clemens K, Garrison Jr LP, Jones A, et al. Strategic use of pharmacoeconomic research in early drug development and global pricing. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 4 (5): 315–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DeBenedette V. Now what [abstract]? Drug Top 1996; 140: 94

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCarthy B. Moving, proving market share. Manage Healthcare 1996; 6 Suppl. 8: S17–20

    Google Scholar 

  11. Monaghan MJ, Monaghan MS. Do market components account for higher U.S. prescription prices? Ann Pharmacother 1996;30: 1489–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Woodward RS, Boxerman SB, Schnitzler MA, et al. Optimum investments in project evaluations: the cost—effectiveness of cost—effectiveness analyses. J Med Syst 1996; 20: 385–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert S. Woodward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodward, R.S., Amir, L., Schnitzler, M.A. et al. A New Product Pricing Model Using Intracorporate Market Perceptions to Extract the Value of Additional Information. Pharmacoeconomics 14, 71–77 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199814010-00007

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199814010-00007

Keywords

Navigation