Abstract
Objective: This model introduces a unique and inexpensive technique to estimate profit increases that might be expected from: (i) an additional clinical trial to establish a drug’s second clinical indication; and (ii) a survey of market demand.
Design: Microsoft Excel™ spreadsheets are used to solicit selected expert opinions about the new product’s annual market share under scenarios reflecting different pricing points, promotional expenditures and clinical advantage.
Main outcome measures and results: The preprogrammed model returns profit-maximising price, promotional expenditure and market differentiation for each expert and the group as a whole. The extent of disagreement among the experts is used to estimate the additional profits which might be expected from a clinical trial and a market survey. Results from an illustrative application indicated greater incremental profits could be expected from the survey of market demand. The clinical trial generated smaller expected incremental profits because several experts felt that the trial’s potential results would not affect the drug’s profit-maximising price.
Conclusions: With a 1-day meeting between 6 experts, the model provided a recommendation about the new product’s profit-maximising market price and promotional expenditure. Furthermore, it estimated profit increases that might be expected from additional clinical trials and a survey of market demand.
References
Berndt E, Wilinsky M, Fazio A, et al. Fluconazole DUE: results empower staff pharmacists. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting; 1994 Dec 29; Miami Beach, P–169 (D)
Lipsy RJ. Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 1 (4): 265–81
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. R&D: the key to innovation [online]. Available from: URL: (http://www.phrma.org/facts/industry/profile97/chap2.html)
Coy P, Gross N, Sansoni S, et al. R&D scoreboard. Business Week 1994 Jun 27: 81–91
Bobula JD. New era in pharmaceutical pricing. J Res Pharm Econ 1996; 7 (1-2): 89–99
Lu J, Comanor WS. Strategic pricing of new pharmaceuticals. Rev Econ Stat 1998; 80 (1): 108–18
Kolassa M. Pharmaceutical pricing at the change of the millennia. J Pharm Mark Manage 1996; 10 (2-3): 109–20
Clemens K, Garrison Jr LP, Jones A, et al. Strategic use of pharmacoeconomic research in early drug development and global pricing. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 4 (5): 315–22
DeBenedette V. Now what [abstract]? Drug Top 1996; 140: 94
McCarthy B. Moving, proving market share. Manage Healthcare 1996; 6 Suppl. 8: S17–20
Monaghan MJ, Monaghan MS. Do market components account for higher U.S. prescription prices? Ann Pharmacother 1996;30: 1489–94
Woodward RS, Boxerman SB, Schnitzler MA, et al. Optimum investments in project evaluations: the cost—effectiveness of cost—effectiveness analyses. J Med Syst 1996; 20: 385–93
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woodward, R.S., Amir, L., Schnitzler, M.A. et al. A New Product Pricing Model Using Intracorporate Market Perceptions to Extract the Value of Additional Information. Pharmacoeconomics 14, 71–77 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199814010-00007
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199814010-00007