Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling the Potential Economic Impact of Viral Load—Driven Triple Drug Combination Antiretroviral Therapy

  • Original Research Article
  • Modelling Economic Impact of Protease Inhibitor Use
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this study is to model the potential economic impact of viral load—driven triple drug combination (including a protease inhibitor) antiretroviral therapy on incremental drug and hospitalisation costs among individuals with HIV disease. Individuals included in the study were HIV—positive men and women from the province of British Columbia, Canada, who were aged 18 years or older and had given consent to access their medical records.

The study employed pharmacoeconomic modelling of drug— and hospitalutilisation patterns among a population—based cohort with free access to antiretroviral therapy. Protease inhibitor use and associated costs based on actual use in a subsequent period was modelled upon men and women who were able to maintain stable CD4+ cell counts (slope з 0) for at least 6 months (baseline period) with an average follow—up period of 30 months (protease—like group). A control was modelled upon individuals with declining CD4+ cell counts (slope < 0) during similar baseline and follow—up periods.

The primary outcome measure was average annual incremental cost of triple drug therapy net of hospitalisation and testing costs in 1996 Canadian dollars ($Can).

The utilisation pattern of drugs and hospitals was modelled from actual use among a total of 1271 individuals who were eligible for this analysis. Programme participants who gave consent to access their medical records were more likely to be men (p < 0.001), older (p < 0.020), and on antiretroviral therapy (p < 0.001) than programme participants who did not give consent. No differences were observed between the protease—like and comparison groups with respect to age (p = 0.65) and CD4+ cell count (p = 0.30) at study entry. Over a period of 1 year, the protease—like group was shown to spend less time in hospital (2.7 vs 6.6 days; p < 0.001). This difference in hospitalisation remained in multivariate models, adjusting for prior AIDS—defining illnesses and gender. The average annual incremental cost of adding a protease inhibitor to a 2—drug antiretroviral regimen was estimated to be $Can2318 per person. The cost implications of hospital stay while using a protease inhibitor drug and 2 nucleosides translated into an average annual incremental cost (savings if negative) of between —$Can4798 and — $Can2227 per person. The overall average annual incremental cost impact per person associated with triple drug therapy with a protease inhibitor varied between —$Can2288 to $Can283. Negative incremental costs imply overall savings from adopting triple combination therapy.

This modelling exercise demonstrated that the cost of triple drug combination antiretroviral therapy with a protease inhibitor among HIV-positive men and women was considerably less than the expected acquisition cost of the drug alone due to hospitalisation savings in the province of British Columbia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carpenter CCJ, Fischl MA, Hammer SC, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997: updated recommendations of the international AIDS society — USA panel. JAMA 1997; 277 (24): 1962–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Petrou S. Current controversies in the treatment of HIV infection and AIDS. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10 (2): 105–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulman KA, Lynn LA, Glick HA, et al. Cost effectiveness of low-dose zidovudine therapy for asymptomatic patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114 (9): 798–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chancellor JV, Hill AM, Sabin A, et. al. Modeling the cost effectiveness of lamivudine/zidovudine combination therapy in HIV infection. Pharmacoeconomics 1997: 12 (1): 54–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore RD, Bartlett JG. Combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV infection. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10 (2): 109–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bloom DE, Carliner G. The economic impact of AIDS in the United States. Science 1988; 239: 604–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scitovsky AA, Rice DP. Estimates of the direct and indirect costs of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in the United States, 1985, 1986, and 1991. Public Health Rep 1987; 102: 5–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS. Therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of HIV/AIDS and related conditions. Vancouver: British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization (WHO). Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS): interim proposal for a WHO staging system for HIV infection and disease. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1990; 65: 221–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Leads from the MMWR: revision of the CDC surveillance case definition for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. JAMA 1987; 258: 1143–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mellors JW, Kingsley LA, Rinaldo CR, et al. Quantification of HIV-RNA in plasma predicts outcome after seroconversion. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 573–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Brian WA, Hartigan PM, Martin D, et al. Changes in plasma HIV—1 RNA and CD4 lymphocyte counts and the risk of progression to AIDS. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 426—31

  13. Mellors JW, Rinaldo CR, Gupta P, et al. Prognosis in HIV-1 infection predicted by the quantity of virus in plasma. Science 1996; 272: 1167–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charge, Ann Intern Med 1982; 96: 102–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987

  16. Hogg RS, Montaner JSG, Sherlock C, et al. Estimating the cost of using plasma viral load determinations for staging and therapeutic monitoring of HIV disease [abstract no. Th.B.913]. The XI International Conference on AIDS; 1996 Jul 7-12; Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neave HR, Worthington PL. Distribution-free tests. London: Routledge, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health 1993; 14: 43–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation. Biometrics 1988; 44 (4): 1049–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anis AH, Hogg RS, Yip B, et al. Average annual drug cost and its determinants in a population based cohort of HIV-positive adult men and women. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13 (3): 327–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore RD, Bartlett JG. Combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV infection. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10 (2): 109–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore RD, Chaisson RE. Costs to Medicaid of advancing immunsupression in an urban HIV—infected population in Maryland. J Acquir

  23. ACTG 320 Protocol Team. Executive summary: a randomized double—blind, phase 111 study of indinavir sulfate (idv) with open—label zidovudine (zdv) or stavudine (d4t) and lamivudine (3tc) in subjects with HIV infection with cd4+ cell counts £200 cells/mm3 and з3 months prior therapy zdv experience, 1997

  24. Gulick RM, Mellors JW, Havlir D, et al. Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 734–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes MD, A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 725–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 146: 473–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aslam H. Anis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anis, A.H., Hogg, R.S., Wang, Xh. et al. Modelling the Potential Economic Impact of Viral Load—Driven Triple Drug Combination Antiretroviral Therapy. Pharmacoeconomics 13, 697–705 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199813060-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199813060-00006

Keywords

Navigation