References
Hillman A, Eisenberg J, Pauly M, et al. Sounding board: avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost—effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. N Engl J Med 1991; 324 (19): 1362–5
Drummond M, Brandt A, Luce B, et al. Standardizing economic evaluation methodologies in health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1993; 9 (1): 26–36
Kassirer JP, Angell M. The journal’s policy on cost—effectiveness analyses. N Engl J Med 1995; 332 (2): 123–5
Commonwealth of Australia. Guidelines for the pharmaceutical industry on preparation of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: including submissions involving economic analysis. Canberra: Department of Health, Housing and Community Services, 1990
Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. 1st ed. Ottawa: CCOHTA, 1994
Udvarhelyi IS, Colditz GA, Rai A, et al. Cost—effectiveness and cost—benefit analyses in the medical literature: are the methods being used correctly? Ann Intern Med 1992; 16 (3): 238–44
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Division, Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communications. Principles for the review of pharmacoeconomic promotions [draft guideline]. Rockville (MD): FDA, 1995
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, editors. Cost—effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freund, D.A., Luce, B.R. The Role of Government and Private Insurers in Guiding and Implementing Pharmacoeconomic Analyses. Pharmacoeconomics 13, 383–387 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199813040-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199813040-00001