Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Riluzole for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We conducted a cost-benefit analysis of riluzole therapy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; motor neuron disease; Lou Gehrig’s disease). The survival of patients with ALS increased by around 3 months as a result of riluzole therapy, from 3 to 3.25 years. A 3-month delay in hospitalisation was also expected as a result of riluzole therapy, resulting in a saving of $US40 per patient (1996 values). This gain was opposed by the additional costs per patient of bimonthly serum ALT monitoring ($US234), 2 days of extra day-hospital observation ($US369) and other medical costs ($US79), as well as extra outpatient visits ($US26) and costs of medication other than riluzole ($US90), resulting from increased longevity.

Using riluzole (at a cost of $US2247 per patient) resulted in an extra burden of $US757 on health services for the gain of an extra 3 months of life expectancy. Thus, health-service costs per life-year gained were $US12 013. Despite the increase in health-service costs as a result of increased longevity, the overall resource benefits to society from using riluzole amounted to $US2884 due to increased productivity benefits, giving a benefit: cost ratio of 1.28: 1. Total benefits to society, including a valuation of 3 extra months of life ($US3599), amounted to $US6483, giving a benefit: cost ratio of 2.89: 1. Therefore, from a societal perspective, the potential benefits of riluzole in patients with ALS clearly exceed costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norris F, Shepherd R, Denys E, et al. Onset, natural history and outcome in idiopathic adult motor neuron disease. J Neurol Sci 1993; 118: 48–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carosico JT, Mulvihill MN, Sterling R, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: its natural history. Neurol Clin 1987; 5: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kondo K, Hemmi I. Clinical statistics in 515 fatal cases of motor neuron disease. Neuroepidemiology 1984; 3: 129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jablecki CK, Berry C, Leach J. Survival prediction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1989; 12: 833–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bach JR. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: communication status and survival with ventilatory support. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 72: 343–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurtzke JF. Risk factors in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Adv Neurol 1991; 56: 245–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chancellor AM, Slattery JM, Fraser H, et al. The prognosis of adult-onset motor neuron disease: a prospective study based on the Scottish Motor Neuron Disease Register. J Neurol 1993; 240: 339–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malgoris C, Daniel M, Doble A. Neuroprotective effects of riluzole on N-methyl-D-aspartate- or veratridine-induced neurotoxicity in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett 1994; 177: 95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin D, Thompson MA, Nadler JV. The neuroprotective agent riluzole inhibits release of glutamate and aspartate from slices of hippocampal areaCAl. Eur J Pharmacol 1993; 250: 473–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Couratier P, Sindou P, Esclaire F, et al. Neuroprotective effects of riluzole in ALS CSF toxicity. Neuroreport 1994; 5: 1012–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Doble A, Hubert JP, Blanchard JC. Pertussis toxin pretreatment abolishes the inhibitory effect of riluzole and carbachol on D-[3H] aspartate release from cultured cerebellar granule cells. Neurosci Lett 1992; 140: 251–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Debono MW, Le Guern J, Canton T, et al. Inhibition by riluzole of electrophysiological responses mediated by rat kainate and NMDA receptors expressed by Xenopus oocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 1993; 235: 283–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hubert JP, Delumeau JC, Glowinski J, et al. Antagonism by riluzole of entry of calcium evoked by NMDA and veratridine in rat cultured granule cells: evidence for a dual mechanism of action. Br J Pharmacol 1994; 113: 261–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rothstein JD. Excitotoxic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Adv Neurol 1995; 68: 7–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw PJ. Excitotoxicity and motor neuron disease: a review of the evidence. J Neurol Sci 1994; 124 Suppl.: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meldrum B. Amino acids as dietary excitotoxins: a contribution to the understanding of neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Res Rev 1993; 18: 293–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Meninger V, ALS/Riluzole Study Group. A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1994; 330 (9): 585–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lacomblez L, Bensimon B, Nigel-Leigh P, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Group II, et al. Dose-ranging study of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet 1966; 347: 1425–1431

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guiloff RJ, Goonetilleke A, Emami J. Riluzole and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [letter]. Lancet 1996; 348: 336–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Monthly Bulletin of Price Statistics, vol. 47, no. 9. Jerusalem, Israel: Central Bureau of Statistics, 1996 Sep

  21. Ministry of Health. Hospitalization prices from 1.1.96 [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Ministry of Health; 1991 Dec. Report no.: 1/96.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benefit Research Group. Riluzole vs usual care in the treatment of ALS: an international economic evaluation. Montreal: Benefit Canada Medico-economic Studies, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  23. Information and Computing Unit. Price list of ambulatory services [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Ministry of Health; 1995 Jan

    Google Scholar 

  24. Central Bureau of Statistics. Statistical abstract of Israel: no: 46. Jerusalem: Hemed Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ginsberg GM. Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-benefit analysis and the value of life in health care and prevention. In: Laaser U, Roccella EJ, Rosenfeld JB, et al., editors. Costs and benefits in health care and prevention. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990: 6–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Ginsberg GM, Shouval D. Cost-benefit analysis of a nationwide neonatal inoculation programme against hepatitis B in an area of intermediate endemicity. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 587–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ginsberg GM, Tulchinsky TH. Cost-benefit analysis of a second measles inoculation of children. In: Kurstack E, editor. Measles and poliomyelitis: vaccines and immunization. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993: 101–117

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ginsberg GM, Dagan R. Cost-benefit analysis of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccination programme. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 485–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary M. Ginsberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginsberg, G.M., Lev, B. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Riluzole for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Pharmacoeconomics 12, 578–584 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199712050-00008

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199712050-00008

Keywords

Navigation