Summary
Pneumonia and influenza, combined, are the sixth leading causes of death in the US. The age-adjusted mortality rate for these diseases increased by 20% between 1979 and 1993, perhaps as a result of the emergence of multi-drug-resistant and penicillin-resistant strains of bacteria that cause pneumonia. Of the approximately $US23 billion annual cost of community-acquired pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia is currently estimated to account for up to $US18 billion.
Considering the clinical and economic consequences of pneumococcal disease, vaccination appears to be a valuable preventive strategy. However, despite Medicare coverage and the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP), only 28% of elderly and high-risk patients received the pneumococcal vaccine in 1993.
This article reviews the epidemiology and economic factors that determine the cost effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination strategies. The strategies are taken from a review of 10 published economic analyses of the pneumococcal vaccine. Cost savings and favourable cost-effectiveness ratios are associated with key factors that increase vaccination programme benefits by maximising averted direct medical costs as well as reducing vaccination programme costs, such as through public vaccination campaigns.
It appears that vaccination of the elderly, high-risk groups under 65 years of age, and patients with HIV infection or AIDS, is cost effective, if not cost saving, and that more widespread use of the vaccine, by means of large-scale vaccination campaigns, is warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Defining the public health impact of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: report of working group. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1996; 45: 1–20
National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Mortality patterns: United States, 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1996; 45: 161–79
National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Adult immunization: knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Dekalb and Fulton Counties, Georgia, 1988. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1988; 37: 657–61
National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Increasing pneumococcal vaccination rates among patients of a national health-care alliance: United States, 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995; 44: 741–4
Fedson DS. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination of the elderly: newer vaccines and prospects for clinical benefits at the margin. Prev Med 1994; 23: 751–5
Bartlett JG, Mundy LM. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1618–24
National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage levels among persons aged >65 years: United States, 1973–1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995; 44: 506–15
Mäkelä PH, Jokinen C, Pyhälä R, et al. Use of vaccines for respiratory infections: strategies for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. J Infect Dis 1990; 70: 141–8
Morris A, Lang SDR. Vaccination against influenza and pneumococcal disease: are we doing our best? N Z Med J 1989; 102: 193–5
Fedson DS, Henrichsen J, Mäkelä PH, et al. WHO recommendations on pneumococcal vaccination: immunization of elderly people with polyvalent pneumococcal vaccine. Infection 1989; 17: 437–41
Musher DM. Streptococcus pneumoniae. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious disease. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994: 1811–26
Lee CJ, Wang TR. Pneumococcal infection and immunization in children. Clin Rev Microb 1994; 20: 1–12
Breiman RF, Spika JS, Navarro VJ, et al. Pneumococcal bacteremia in Charleston County, South Carolina: a decade later. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 1401–5
Forrester HL, Jahnigen DW, LaForce FM. Inefficacy of pneumococcal vaccine in high-risk population. Am J Med 1987; 83: 425–30
Pesola GR, Charles A. Pneumococcal bacteremia with pneumonia: mortality in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Chest 1992; 101: 150–5
Gable CB, Holzer SS, Engelhart L, et al. Pneumococcal vaccine: efficacy and associated cost savings. JAMA 1990; 264: 2910–5
Janoff EN, Breiman RF, Daley CL, et al. Pneumococcal disease during HIB infection. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 314–24.
Fedson DS. Improving the use of pneumococcal vaccine through strategy of hospital-based immunization: a review of its rationale and implications. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985; 33: 142–50
Graves EJ. Detailed diagnoses and procedures national hospital discharge survey, 1992: national center for health statistics. Vital Health Stat 13 1994; 118: 81
Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP). Recommendations of the immunization practices advisory committee pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. JAMA 1989; 261: 1265–7
National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Successful strategies in adult immunization. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1991; 40: 700–9
Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, et al. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 2666–77
Fedson DS. Clinical practice and public policy for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination of the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1992; 8(1): 183–99
Fiebach N, Beckett W. Prevention of respiratory infections in adults: influenza and pneumococcal vaccine. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 2545–57
Shapiro ED, Berg AT, Austrian R, et al. The protective efficacy of polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1453–9
Sims RV, Steinmann WC, McConville JH, et al. The clinical effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccine in the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 653–7
Butler JC, Breiman RF, Campbell JF, et al. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine efficacy: an evaluation of current recommendations. JAMA 1993; 270: 1826–31
Hirshmann JV, Lipsky BA. The pneumococcal vaccine after 15 years of use. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 373–7
LaForce FM. Adult immunizations: are they worth the trouble? J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: S57–61
Fedson DS, Plotkin SA, Mortimer EA. Pneumococcal vaccine. Vaccine 1988; 13: 271
Simberkoff MS. Pneumococcal vaccination in the prevention of community-acquired pneumonia: a skeptical view of cost-effectiveness. Semin Respir Infect 1993; 8: 294–9
Levy E. Evaluation socio-économique d’un vaccin contre l’infection pneumococcique. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1981; 29: 133–53
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. A review of selected federal vaccine and immunization policies: based on case studies of pneumococcal vaccine. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1979
Patrick KM, Woolley FR. A cost-benefit analysis of immunization for pneumococcal pneumonia. JAMA 1981; 245: 473–7
Ament AJ, Sprenger M, Botman MJ, et al. Kosten-batenanalyse van vaccinatie tegen pneumokokkenpneumonie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1986; 130: 407–10
Fedson DS, Harward MP, Reid RA, et al. Hospital-based pneumococcal immunization: epidemiologic rationale from the Shenandoah study. JAMA 1990; 264: 1117–22
Holzer SS, Gable CB, Friedman RB. Cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccine: implications for managed care. J Res Pharm Econ 1993; 5(1): 79–95
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Update of federal activities regarding the use of pneumococcal vaccine: a technical memorandum. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1984
Rose DN, Schechter CB, Sacks HS. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination of HIV-infected patients: a policy analysis. Am J Med 1993; 94: 160–8
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer price index. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, 1996
Federal Reserve. Statistical Release. Foreign Exchange Rate 1/11/96. Washington, DC: US Federal Researve, 1996
Healthcare Financing Administration (HCFA) Bureau of Data Management and Strategy. FY95 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) File. Baltimore: HCFA, Jun 1995
St. Anthony’s DRG Guidebook, 1995. Reston (VA): St. Anthony Publishing, 1994: 42
Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 146: 473–81
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford Press, 1996
Jimenez FJ, Guallar P, Rubio C, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pnemococcal vaccination in the elderly Spanish population. Br J Med Econ 1996; 10: 193–202
Rubio PP, Morales PG, Sanmarti LS. Cost effectiveness of pnemococcal vaccination in Catalonia. Rev Esp Salud Publica 1995; 69(5): 409–17
Healthcare Financing Administration (HCFA) Office of Managed Care. TEFRA Risk HMOs/CMPS. Baltimore: HCFA, Mar 1996
Healthcare Financing Administration (HCFA) 1995 Statistics. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1995
National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention and managed care: opportunities for managed care organizations, purchasers of health care, and public health agencies. JAMA 1996; 275: 26–9
Fedson DS. Influenza and pneumococcal immunization strategies for physicians. Chest 1987; 91: 436–43
McBean AM, Babish JD, Prihoda R. The utilization of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among elderly Medicare beneficiaries, 1985–1988. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 2009–16
Foundation for accountability. Accountability Action 1996; 1(1): 9
General Accounting Office (GAO). Immunization: HHS could do more to increase vaccination among older adults. Washington, DC: GAO/PEMD-95-14, 1995
Quick RE, Hoge CW, Hamilton DJ, et al. Underutilization of pneumococcal vaccine in nursing homes in Washington State: report of a serotype-specific outbreak and a survey. Am J Med 1993; 94: 149–52
Fedson DS, Wajda A, Nicol JP, et al. The old man’s friend [letter]. Lancet 1993; 342: 561
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gable, C.B., Botteman, M., Savage, G. et al. The Cost Effectiveness of Pneumococcal Vaccination Strategies. Pharmacoeconomics 12, 161–174 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199712020-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199712020-00006