Skip to main content
Log in

The Societal Value of Pharmaceuticals

Balancing Industrial and Healthcare Policy

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pharmaceutical policy arises through an ongoing process of negotiation and interaction among the key players in the pharmaceutical market: consumers, industry, healthcare providers and government. There is constant discussion about the just distribution of reward between cost-containment goals and the goals of research and development in the pharmaceutical arena. All industrial countries are under pressure to control healthcare costs, but it is unclear how cost-containment policies will influence industrial policies for Pharmaceuticals. The pharmaceutical industry is an easy target for governmental cost-containment policies. The industry is driven by 3 issues: access to consumers, access to new technology and new competitive realities. The launch of a new, innovative product that represents a significant therapeutic breakthrough is becoming increasingly difficult, and a major challenge for politicians and governments will be to balance the need for cost-effective use of drugs and the need to create a favourable climate for innovation. Previously, there was generally little competition between pharmaceutical companies, but those companies will now have to undergo fundamental and comprehensive changes. Particularly, it will be important to have extremely well developed and integrated management systems focusing on both consumers and costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James BG. The pharmaceutical industry in 2000: reinvesting the pharmaceutical company. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrahams P. Bitter medicines for producers [letter]. Financial Times 1994 Sep 30:2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rettig RA. Medical innovation duels cost containment. Health Aff 1994 Summer: 7–28

  4. Easton DA. System analysis of political life. Chicago: University Express, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  5. Øvretveit J. Purchasing for health. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stigler G. The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 1971; 2(1): 3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drummond MF, Rutten F, Brenna A, et al. Economic evaluation of Pharmaceuticals: a European perspective. PharmacoEconomics 1993; 3: 173–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sosialdepartementet. Heisepolitikken mot år 2000: nasjonal heiseplan. Stortingsmelding nr. 41 (1987–88). Oslo: Sosial-departementet, 1988

  9. Chain EB. Academic and industrial contributions to drug research. Nature 1963 Nov: 200–441

  10. Siskind DA. Contributions of the pharmaceutical industry to improved health. In: Lindsay CM, editor. The pharmaceutical industry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmeyer UK, McCarthy TR. Financing health care. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  12. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The reform of health care: a comparative analysis of seven countries. Paris: OECD, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abel-Smith B. Health reform: old wine in new bottles. Euro-health 1995; 1(1): 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maynard A. Whither OTC medicines? Swiss Pharma 1994; 5-S: 15–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson GM, Spitzer WO, Weinstein MC, et al. Benefits, risks and costs of prescription drugs: a scientific basis for evaluating policy options. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990; 48: 111–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grund J, Husbyn H. The role of pharmacoeconomics in health policy and management in Norway. PharmacoEconomics 1995; 7(6): 475–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jönsson B. Economic evaluation of medicines: why and how? Nordiska Lakemedelsnamden 1995; 38: 11–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). Guidelines for the pharmaceutical industry on preparation of submissions to the pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee. Canberra: Government Publishing Service, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  19. Porter ME. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  20. Commission of the European Communities. On the outlines of an industrial policy for the pharmaceutical sector in the European Community. COM (93) 718 final. Brussels: 02.03, 1994

  21. Gelijns A, Rosenberg N. The dynamics of technological change in medicine. Health Aff 1994 Sum: 28–46

  22. Hafslund Nycorned. Årsmelding 1994 [annual report]. Oslo: Hafslund Nycomed, 1995

  23. Amdam RP, Sogner K. Rik på kontraster. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sogner K. Nations, clusters and culture: Nycomed and world leadership in the field of X-ray contrast media. Scand Econ Hist Rev 1993; 3: 209–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maynard A. The regulation of the pharmaceutical industry. In: Drummond MF, Maynard A, editors. Purchasing and providing cost-effective health care. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bloom D. In need of care [letter]. Economist 1995 Aug 12; 7927:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  27. Atkinson SH. University-affiliated venture capital funds. Health Aff 1994 Summer: 159–76

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grund, J. The Societal Value of Pharmaceuticals. Pharmacoeconomics 10, 14–22 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199610010-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199610010-00003

Keywords

Navigation