Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Evaluation of Drugs and its Potential Uses in Policy Making

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Interest in the economic evaluation of drug treatments is steadily increasing, but the impact of such evaluations on decisions concerning the use of drugs is unclear. In this article I examine different decision and policy situations where economic evaluations of drug treatments could potentially be used. Economic evaluations may be used as an aid to the development of treatment guidelines, decisions within healthcare organisations. and decisions relating to approval, reimbursement and pricing.

Economic evaluations appear to be most useful in the development of treatment guidelines and as an aid to reimbursement decisions. The incentive to use economic evaluations embodied in the healthcare system is also important. It is argued that it is too early to introduce regulations that require the use of economic evaluations in, for example, reimbursement decisions. A more cautious approach might be preferred, where economic evaluations are used more selectively until the methodology and the field have developed further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weinstein MC, Zeckhauser R. Critical ratios and efficient allocation. J Public Econ 1973; 2: 147–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mishan EJ. Cost-benefit analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Praeger, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baumol WJ. Economic theory and operations analysis. 3rd ed. London: Prentice Hall, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  5. Socialstyrelsens kommitte för läketnedelsbehandling. Rekommendationer från ett expertmöte: individualiserad hypertonibehandling, Lakartidningen 1990; 87: 2255–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johannesson M. The Australian guidelines for subsidisation of pharmaceuticals: the road to cost-effcctive drug prescribing? PharmacoEconomics 1992; 2: 355–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manning WG, Keeler EB, Newhouse JP, et al. The costs of poor health habits. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henry D. Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions: the development of Australian guidelines for pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics 1992; 1: 54–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aristides M, Mitchell A. Applying the Australian guidelines for the reimbursement of pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics 1994; 6: 196–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario guidelines for economic analysis of pharmaceutical products. Toronto: Ministry of Health, 1994

  11. Detsky AS. Guidelines for economic analysis of pharmaceutical products: a draft document for Ontario and Canada. PharmacoEconomics 1993; 3: 354–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Drummond MF, Rutten F, Brenna A, et al. Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: a European perspective. PharmacoEconomics 1993; 4: 173–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van Hout B, Rutten F. Economic appraisal of health technology in the European community. In: Schubert F, editor. Proceedings of a Canadian collaborative workshop on pharmacoeconomics. Princeton (NJ): Escerpta Medica Inc., 1993: 8–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnnnesson, M. Economic Evaluation of Drugs and its Potential Uses in Policy Making. Pharmacoeconomics 8, 190–198 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199508030-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199508030-00003

Keywords

Navigation