Skip to main content
Log in

Cost Effectiveness of Roxithromycin Versus Cefaclor in Australia

  • Correspondence
  • Cost Effectiveness of Roxithromycin Versus Cefaclor in Australia
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Scott WG, Tilyard MW, Dovey SM, et al. Roxithromycin versus cefaclor in lower respiratory tract infection: a generaI practicepharmacoeconomic study. Pharmaco Economics 1993; 4: 122–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bridges-Webb C, Britt H, Miles DA, et al. Morbidity and treatment in generaI practice in Australia 1990–1991. Med J Aust 1992; 157 Suppl. 19 Oct: SI–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits for approved pharmacists and medicaI practitioners. August 1993. Canberra: AustralianPublishing Service, 1993

  4. Commonwealth of Australia. Health insurance (1993–1994 generaI medicaI services table) regulations. Schedule of servicesand fees. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printer,Pharmaco Economics, 1993

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, W.G., Cooper, B.C., Scott, H.M. et al. Cost Effectiveness of Roxithromycin Versus Cefaclor in Australia. Pharmacoeconomics 7, 93–94 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199507010-00009

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199507010-00009

Keywords

Navigation