References
Birch S, Gafni A. Cost-effectiveness/utility analyses: do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be? CHEPA Working Paper, pp. 91–96. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, 1991
Boyer JG, Hirsch JD, Osterhaus JT, Townsend RJ. Correspondence. Potential for bias in economic analyses. New England Journal of Medicine 325: 1385, 1991
Cairns J. Discounting and health benefits: another perspective. Health Economics 1: 76–79, 1992
Coyle D, Tolley K. Discounting of health benefits in the pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapies: an issue for debate? PharmacoEconomics 2: 153–162, 1992
Drummond MF. Cost-effectiveness guidelines for reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals: is economic evaluation ready for its enhanced status? Health Economics 1: 85–92, 1992
Henry D. Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation: the development of Australian guidelines for Pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics 1: 54–67, 1992
Hillman AL, Eisenberg JM, Pauly MV, Bloom BS, Glick H, et al. Avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 1362–1365, 1991
Ontario Ministry of Health. Guidelines for preparation of economic analysis to be included in submissions to Drug Programs for listing in the Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary/Comparative Drug Index, Ministry of Health, Toronto, 1991
Parsonage M, Neuberger H. Discounting and health benefits. Health Economics 1: 71–76, 1992
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wells, N.E.J. Regulation of the Pharmaceutical Industry. PharmacoEconomics 2, 435–439 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202060-00002
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202060-00002