Summary
A review of research on consumer fees for drugs and drug utilisation suggests that the demand for drugs tends to be quite insensitive to consumer fees. Although higher consumer fees are associated with slightly reduced rates of drug utilisation, use of most other medical services is not meaningfully affected and health status has not been shown to be adversely affected. The larger impact of consumer fees demonstrated in the published literature is to shift drug costs from third parties to consumers. Since much of the literature is limited to insurance programmes with quite small consumer fees, the generalisability of results may be limited. Ability-to-pay and health needs may also be important considerations in the relationship between use and fees for particular drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avorn J. The elderly and drug policy: coming of age. Health Affairs 9Z: 6–16, 1990
Baker C, Kramer N. Employer sponsored prescription drug benefits, Monthly Labor Review 114: 31–35, 1991
Begg D. Do patients cash prescriptions? An audit of one practice. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 34: 262, 272-274, 1984
Berk ML, Schur CL, Mohr P. Using survey data to estimate prescription drug costs. Health Affairs 9: 146–56, 1990
Bootman JL, Townsend RJ, McGhan WF. Principles of pharmacoeconomics, Harvey Whitney Books, Ohio, 1991
Broyles RW, Rosko MD. The demand for health insurance and health care: a review of the empirical literature. Medical Care Review 45: 291–338, 1988
Carroll NV, Wolfgang AP. Inherent risk and market acceptance of generic drug products. Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management 9: 48–51, 1989
Col N, Fanale JE, Kronholm P. The role of medication noncompliance and adverse drug reactions in hospitalizations of the elderly. Archives of Internal Medicine 150: 841–845, 1990
Cooper JK, Love DW, Raffoul PR. Intentional prescription non-adherence (noncompliance) by the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 30: 329–333, 1982
Custer WS. Employer health care plan design and its effect on plan costs. Inquiry 28: 81–6, 1991
Foxman B, Valdez RB, Lohr KN. The effect of free care on the use of antibiotics: results from a population-based randomized control trial. Journal of Chronic Diseases 40: 429–437, 1987
Gagnon JP. Drug use economics: prescription and nonprescription drug use. In Bootman JL et al. (Eds) Principles of pharmacoeconomics, pp. 18–33, Harvey Whitney Books, Ohio, 1991
Gertler P, van der Gaag J. The willingness to pay for medical care: evidence from two developing countries, The World Bank, Washington DC, 1990
Glaser M. Indemnity plans turning to mail order, cards. Drug Topics 136: 64, 1991
Glaser M. The card that failed by doubling Rx use. Drug Topics 134: 48, 1990
Glaser WA. Health insurance in practice: International variations in financing, benefits, and problems, Jossey-Bass, California, 1991
Gold M, Joffe M, Kennedy TL, Tucker AM. Pharmacy benefits in health maintenance organizations. Health Affairs 8: 182–190, 1989
Grabowski H. Medicaid patients’ access to new drugs. Health Affairs 7: 102–114, 1988
Griffin MT. AIDS drugs and the pharmaceutical industry: a need for reform. American Journal of Law and Medicine 17: 363–410, 1991
Grossman M. The demand for health: a theoretical and empirical investigation, National Bureau for Economic Research, New York, 1972
Harris BL, Stergachis A, Ried LD. The effect of drug co-payments on utilization and cost of pharmaceuticals in a health maintenance organization. Medical Care 28: 907–917, 1990
Johnson RE, Campbell WH, Azevedo DJ. Examining the drug utilization and expenditures of a medically indigent population. Inquiry 15: 38–44, 1978
Kirking DM, Ascione FJ. An analysis of research on mail order pharmacy services. Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Economics 2: 15–39, 1990
Kirking DM, Ascione FJ, Richards JW. Choices in prescription-drug benefit programs: mail versus community pharmacy services. Milbank Quarterly 68: 29–51, 1990
Kotzan L, Carroll NV, Kotzan JA. Influence of age, sex, and race on prescription drug use among Georgia Medicaid recipients. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 46: 287–290, 1989
Kozma CM, Reeder CE, Lingle EW. Expanding Medicaid drug formulary coverage: effects on utilization of related services. Medical Care 28: 963–977, 1990
Lavers RJ. Prescription charges, the demand for prescriptions and morbidity. Applied Economics 21: 1043–1052, 1989
Lavizzo-Mourey RJ, Eisenberg JM. Prescription drugs, practicing physicians, and the elderly. Health Affairs 9: 20–35, 1990
Leibowitz A. Substitution between prescribed and over-the-counter medications. Medical Care 27: 85–94, 1989
Leibowitz A, Manning WG, Newhouse JP. The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing. Social Science and Medicine 21: 1063–1069, 1985
Levy R. Prescription cost sharing: economic and health impacts, and implications. PharmacoEconomics 2: 219–237, 1992
Lindgren B, Silverberg R. Subsidizing pharmaceutical prescriptions: the experience of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Social Science and Medicine 21: 1089–1096, 1985
Lingle EW Jr, Kirk KW, Kelly WR. The impact of outpatient drug benefits on the use and costs of health care services for the elderly. Inquiry 24: 203–211, 1987
Lohr RN, Brook RH, Kamberg CJ, Goldberg GA, Leibowitz A, et al. Use of medical care in the Rand health insurance experiment: diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized control trial. Medical Care 24 (Suppl. 9): S1–S87, 1986
Manning WG, Newhouse JP, Duan N, Keeler EB, Leibowitz A, Marquis MS. Health insurance and the demand for medical care, American Economic Review 77: 251–277, 1987
Moeller J, Mathiowetz N. Prescribed medicines: a summary of use and expenditures by Medicare beneficiaries, National Medical Expenditure Research Finding 3, National Center for Health, Services Research and Technology Assessment, Washington, DC, 1989
National Pharmaceutical Council. Pharmaceutical benefits under state medical assistance programs, The Council, Virginia, 1991
Nelson AA Jr, Reeder CE, Dickson WM. The effect of a Medicaid drug copayment program on the utilization and cost of prescription services, Medical Care 22: 724–736, 1984
Nelson L, Ciemnecki A, Carlton N, Langwell K. Assignment and the participating physician program: an analysis of beneficiary awareness, understanding, and experiences. Background Paper No. 89–1, Physician Payment Review Commission, Washington, DC, 1989
Nichol KL, Lofgren GP, Gapinski J. Influenza vaccination: Knowledge, attitudes and behavior among high risk outpatients. Archives of Internal Medicine 152: 106–110, 1992
O’Brien B. The effect of patient charges on the utilisation of prescription medicines. Journal of Health Economics 8: 109–132, 1989
Penden EA, Lee ML. Output and inflation components of medical care and other spending changes. Health Care Financing Review 13: 75–81, 1991
Richardson JL. Perspectives on compliance with drug regimens among the elderly. Journal of Compliance in Health Care 1: 33–45, 1986
Roemer MI, Hopkins CE, Carr L, Gartside F. Copayments for ambulatory care: penny-wise and pound foolish. Medical Care 13: 457–466, 1975
Ryan M, Birch S. Charging for health care: evidence on the utilisation of NHS prescribed drugs. Social Science and Medicine 33: 681–687, 1991
Ryan M, Yule B, Bond C, Taylor RJ. Scottish general practitioners attitudes and knowldege in respect to prescribing costs. British Medical Journal 300: 1316–1318, 1990
Schondelmeyer SW, Thomas J. Trends in retail prescription expenditures. Health Affairs 9: 131–145, 1990
Scott MB. Options allow employer to trim drug costs. Employee Benefit Plan Review 46: 28–35, 1991
Smith DG. The effects of copayments and generic substitution on the use and cost of prescription drugs. Working paper, University of Michigan, 1992
Sonnefeld ST, Waldo DR, Lemieux JA, McKusick DR. Projections of national health expenditures through the year 2000. Health Care Financing Review 13: 1–15, 1991
Soumerai SB, Avorn J, Ross-Degnan D, Gortmaker S. Payment restrictions for prescription drugs under Medicaid: effects on therapy, cost, and equity. New England Journal of Medicine 317: 550–556, 1987
Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Avorn J. Effects of medicaid drug payment limits on admission to hospitals and nursing homes. New England Journal of Medicine 325: 1072–1077, 1991
Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Gortmaker S, Avom J. Withdrawing payment for nonscientific drug therapy: intended and unexpected effects of a large-scale natural experiment. Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 831–839, 1990
Stuart B, Avorn F, Rabatin V, Johnson A. Patterns of outpatient prescription drug use among Pennsylvania elderly. Health Care Financing Review 12: 61–72, 1991
United States General Accounting Office. Prescription drugs: little is known about the effects of direct-to-consumer advertising, Washington, DC, 1991a
United States General Accounting Office. Prescription drugs: selected direct-to-consumer advertising studies have methodological flaws, Washington, DC, 1991b
Wagoner GB, Holton JM, Vigen GJ. Presciption drug coverage. Conference of Actuaries in Public Practice 40: 131–130, 1990
Waldo DR. Outpatient prescription drug spending by the Medicare population. Health Care Financing Review 9(1): 83–89, 1987
Warner KE. Legalizing drugs: lessons from (and about) economics. Milbank Quarterly 69(4): 641–661, 1991
Weiner JP, Lyles A, Steinwachs DM, Hall KC. Impact of managed care on prescription drug use. Health Affairs 10(1): 140–154, 1991
Wells KB, Kamberg C, Brook R, Camp P, Rogers W. Health status, sociodemographic factors and the use of prescribed psychotropic drugs. Medical Care 23(11): 1295–1306, 1985
Yule B, Ryan M, Bond C, Taylor RJ. Awareness of drug costs among general practitioner trainees. Medical Education 25(6): 536–538, 1991
Zadoroznyj M, Svarstad BL. Gender, employment and medication use. Social Science and Medicine 31(9): 971–978, 1990
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, D.G., Kirking, D.M. Impact of Consumer Fees on Drug Utilisation. PharmacoEconomics 2, 335–342 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202040-00008
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202040-00008