Summary
Optimal management of hypertension involves finding a balance among its benefits, risks and costs. Cost-effectiveness analysis helps to clarify not only the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of treatment, but also the trade-offs between the risks and benefits, and the costs and quality of therapy. Existing analyses of hypertension treatment suggest a consistent set of strategies by which cost-effectiveness may be improved. These include strategies to increase the effectiveness of therapy, such as excluding false-positive diagnoses of hypertension, and according higher priority to treating patients with sustained elevations of diastolic blood pressure above 100mm Hg. A complementary set of strategies involve reducing the costs of therapy by prescribing lower-cost first-step regimens, making use of the minimum effective dose for particular medicines and attempting step-down therapy for suitable patients. Consideration of economic factors in initiating hypertension treatment is consistent with sound clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderman MH. Which antihypertensive drugs first — and why! Journal of the American Medical Association 267: 2786–2787, 1992
American College of Physicians, Health and Public Policy Committee. Automated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Annals of Internal Medicine 104: 275–278, 1986
Baksaas I. Patterns in drug utilization — national and international aspects: antihypertensive drugs. Acta Medica Scandinavica 683 (Suppl): 59–66, 1984
Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Jackson R, Stewart A. Prevention and control of hypertension in New Zealand: a reappraisal. New Zealand Medical Journal 101: 480–483, 1988
Bergman U. Antihypertensives in Sweden — sales and therapeutic traditions. In Strandberg et al. (Eds) Treatment of mild hypertension. National Board of Health and Welfare Drug Information Committee, Uppsala, Sweden, 1987
Blaufox MD, Langford HG, Oberman A, Hawkins CM, Wassertheil-Smoller S, et al. Effect of dietary change on the return of hypertension after withdrawal of prolonged antihypertensive therapy (DISH). Journal of Hypertension 2 (Suppl. 3): 179–181, 1984
Bock KD. Changing prescription patterns: impact on costs. Journal of Hypertension 5 (Suppl. 3): S83–S85, 1987
Bostick Rm, Luepker RV, Kofron PM, Pirie PL. Changes in physician practice for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Archives of Internal Medicine 151: 478–484, 1991
British Hypertension Working Party. Treating mild hypertension: agreement from large trials. British Medical Journal 298: 694–698, 1989
Carlsen JE, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Johansen P. Relation between dose of bendrofluazide, antihypertensive effect, and adverse biochemical effects. British Medical Journal 300: 975–978, 1990
Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, Brown B, Bulpitt CJ et al. The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. New England Journal of Medicine 314: 1657–1664, 1986
Cutler JA, Brittain E. Calcium and blood pressure. An epidemiological perspective. American Journal of Hypertension 3: 137S, 1990
Douglas-Jones AP, Cruickshank JM. Once-daily dosing with atenolol in patients with mild or moderate hypertension. British Medical Journal 1: 990–991, 1976
Edelson JT, Weinstein MC, Tosteson ANA, Williams L, Lee TH, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 408–413, 1990
Evans CE, Haynes RB, Goldsmith CH, Hewson SA. Home blood-pressure measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy. Journal of Hypertension 7: 133–142, 1989
Forrow L, Wartman SA, Brock DW. Science, ethics, and the making of clinical decisions. Implications for risk factor intervention. Journal of the American Medical Association 259: 3161–3167, 1988
Gifford RW. Essential hypertension: cost-effective evaluation and treatment. American Journal of Medicine 81 (Suppl C): C–23–C–37, 1986
Gifford RW, Borazanian RA. Traditional first-line therapy. Overview of medical benefits and side effects. Hypertension 13 (Suppl. 1): I–119–I–124, 1989
Hampton JR. Evidence suggesting that mild hypertension need not be treated. Journal of Hypertension 4 (Suppl. 5): S528–S532, 1986
Herxheimer A. How much drug in the tablet? Lancet 337: 346–348, 1991
Hjort PF, Holmen J, Waaler HT. Relation between drug utilization and morbidity pattern: antihypertensive drugs. Acta Medica Scandinavica (Suppl. 683): 89–93, 1984
Hurley SF, Williams SL, McNeil JJ. Trends in prescribing of antihypertensive drugs in Australia, 1977–1987. Medical Journal of Australia 152: 259–266, 1990
Jeffers TA, Webster J, Petrie JC, Barker NP. Atenolol once-daily in hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 4: 523–527, 1977
Johannesson M, Jönsson B. Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension treatment: a review of methodological issues. Health Policy 19: 55–78, 1991
Johannesson M, Jönsson B. A review of cost-effectiveness analyses of hypertension. PharmacoEconomics 1: 250–264, 1992
Johannesson M, Borgquist L, Jönsson B, Rastam L. The costs of treating hypertension: an analysis of different cut-off points. Health Policy 18: 141–150, 1991
Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Archives of Internal Medicine 148: 1023–1038, 1988
Kaplan NM, Alderman MH, Flamenbaum W, McCarron DA, Perry HM, Saunders E, Schoenberger JA. Guidelines for the treatment of hypertension. American Journal of Hypertension 2: 75–77, 1989
Kaplan NM. Long-term effectiveness of nonpharmacological treatment of hypertension. Hypertension 18 (Suppl. 3): 1–153, 1991
Kaplan NM. The appropriate goals of antihypertensive therapy: neither too much nor too little. Annals of Internal Medicine 116: 686–690, 1992
Kawachi I, Malcolm LA, Purdie G. Variability in antihypertensive drug therapy in general practice: results from a random national survey. New Zealand Medical Journal 102: 307–309, 1989
Kawachi I, Malcolm LA. The benefits of treating mild to moderate hypertension. A quantitative estimation of the life expectancy gains from pharmacological reduction of blood pressure. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 42: 905–912, 1989a
Kawachi I, Malcolm LA. The rising expenditure on antihypertensive drugs in New Zealand, 1981–1987. Health Policy 12: 275–284, 1989b
Kawachi I, Malcolm LA. Treating mild to moderate hypertension: cost-effectiveness and policy implications. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 16 (Suppl. 7): S126–S128, 1990
Kawachi I, Malcolm LA. The cost-effectiveness of treating mild-to-moderate hypertension: a reappraisal. Journal of Hypertension 9: 199–208, 1991
Knorr M, Freilingsdorf J, Graf F, Vetter H, Vetter W. Prescription patterns and costs of antihypertensive drugs in two outpatient clinics: Zurich (Switzerland) and Munster (FRG), 1975–1985. Nephron 47 (Suppl. 1): 120–124, 1987
Langford HG, Balufox MD, Oberman A, Hawkins M, Curb JD et al. Dietary therapy slows the return of hypertension after stopping prolonged medication. Journal of the American Medical Association 253: 657–664, 1985
Littenberg B, Garber AM, Sox HC Jr. Screening for hypertension. Annals of Internal Medicine 112: 192–202, 1990
McCarron DA, Hare LE, Walker BR. Therapeutic and economic controversies in antihypertensive therapy. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 6: S837–840, 1984
Maling TJB, Kawachi I. Minimum effective dosage in the drug treatment of hypertension: a cost effective strategy for prescribers. New Zealand Medical Journal 103: 231–233, 1990
MacMahon SW, Cutler JA, Furberg CD, Payne GH. The effects of drug treatment for hypertension on morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease: a review of randomised controlled trials. Progress in Cardiovascular Disease 39: 99–118, 1986
MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1: Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 335: 765–774, 1990
Management Committee of the Australian Therapeutic Trial in Mild Hypertension. Untreated mild hypertension. Lancet 1: 185–191, 1982
McVeigh G, Galloway D, Johnston D. The case for low dose diuretics in hypertension: comparison of low and conventional doses of cyclopenthiazide. British Medical Journal 297: 95–98, 1988
Memorandum from a WHO/ISH Meeting. 1989 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. Journal of Hypertension 7: 689–693, 1989
Millar JA, Waal-Manning HJ. Current treatment of hypertension. Part 1: diagnosis and nonpharmacological therapy. New Zealand Medical Journal 105: 39–40, 1992a
Millar JA, Waal-Manning HJ. Current treatment of hypertension. Part 2: risk factors, drug treatment and economic aspects. New Zealand Medical Journal 105: 61–63, 1992b
Millar JA. Unit tablet size of antihypertensive drugs. New Zealand Medical Journal 105: 65, 1992
Moser M. Is drug treatment indicated for mild hypertension with diastolic blood pressure 90mm Hg to 100mm Hg? An affirmative view. Journal of Family Practice 26: 449–459, 1988
Oberman A, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Langford HG, Blaufox MD, Davis BR, et al. Pharmacologic and nutritional treatment of mild hypertension: changes in cardiovascular risk status. Annals of Internal Medicine 112: 89, 1990
Pickering TG, James GD, Boddie C, Harshfield GA, Blank S, et al. How common is white coat hypertension? Journal of the American Medical Association 259: 225–228, 1988
Ray WA, Schaffner W, Oates JA. Therapeutic choice in the treatment of hypertension. American Journal of Medicine 81 (Suppl. 6c): 9–16, 1986
Reeves RA, Myers MG. Introduction: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring — an emerging technology. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 14: 198–201, 1991
Schmieder RE, Rockstroh JK, Messerli FH. Antihypertensive therapy. To stop or not to stop? Journal of the American Medical Association 265: 1566–1571, 1991
Serlin MJ, Orme MLE, Baber NS, Sibeon RG, Breckenridge A. Propranolol in the control of blood pressure: a dose response study. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 127: 586–592, 1980
SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final Results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Journal of the American Medical Association 265: 3255–3264, 1991
Sleight P. High blood pressure. What level to treat? Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 7: S109–S111, 1985
Stason WB. Cost and quality trade-offs in the treatment of hypertension. Hypertension 13 (Suppl. I): I–145–I–148, 1989
Steven ID, Wilson DH, Wakefield MA, Beilby J, Coffey GA, et al. South Australian hypertension survey. General practitioner knowledge and reported management practices — a cause for concern? Medical Journal of Australia 156: 423–428, 1992a
Steven ID, Wilson DH, Wakefield MA, Beilby J, Coffey GA, et al. South Australian hypertension survey. General practitioner experiences with drug treatment. Medical Journal of Australia 156: 641–644, 1992b
Swales JD. First line treatment in hypertension. British Medical Journal 301: 1172–1173, 1990
Swales JD. Antihypertensive drugs and plasma lipids. British Heart Journal 66: 409–410, 1991
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. Captopril: evaluation of low doses, twice daily sessions and the addition of diuretic for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Clinical Science 63: 443s–445s, 1982
Weiland SK, Keil U, Spelsberg A, Hense HW, Hartel U, et al. Diagnosis and management of hypertension by physicians in the Federal Republic of Germany. Journal Hypertension 9: 131–134, 1991
Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Hypertension: a policy perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts, 1976
World Hypertension League. Physical exercise in the management of hypertension: a consensus statement by the World Hypertension League. Journal of Hypertension 9: 283–287, 1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kawachi, I. Economic Factors in the Initiation of Antihypertensive Therapy. PharmacoEconomics 2, 324–334 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202040-00007
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202040-00007