Summary
Information about the economic benefit of new drugs is becoming increasingly important for formulary considerations, reimbursement policies and related considerations. Although economic benefits of drugs have been analysed and reported, the economic benefits of drugs have rarely been examined in the course of randomised therapeutic trials. We designed a modular survey instrument, the Resource Utilisation Survey (RUS), to collect economic outcomes in prospective trials. A pilot test of the RUS was conducted using clinical trial methods in a study of nizatidine versus placebo in preventing ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The purpose of the pilot study was to evaluate the RUS instrument and corresponding study design issues in clinical trials for either acute or chronic diseases. With the lessons learned from the pilot study, the RUS has been used successfully in other ongoing clinical trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bulpitt CJ, Fletcher AE. Economic assessments in randomized controlled trials. Medical Journal of Australia 153 (Suppl.): S16–S19, 1990
Crane VS. Developing a rational basis for cost-effective antibiotic selection in a community hospital: use of decision analysis method. Advances in Therapy 4: 137–144, 1987
Crane VS. Economic aspects of clinical decision making: Applications of clinical decision analysis. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 45: 548–553, 1988
Dao TD. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of drug therapy. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 42: 791–802, 1985
Davies NE, Felder LH. Applying brakes to the runaway American health care system. Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 73–76, 1990
Drummond MF. Principles of economic appraisal in health care. Oxford University Press, New York, 1980
Drummond MF. Survey of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in industrialised countries. World Health Statistics Quarterly 38: 383–401, 1985
Drummond M, Davies L. Economic analysis alongside clinical trials. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 7: 561–573, 1991
Drummond MF, Stoddart GL. Economic analysis and clinical trials. Controlled Trials 5: 115–128, 1984
Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford Medical Publications, New York, 1987
Drummond M, Teeling Smith G, Wells N. Economic evaluation in the development of medicines. Office of Health Economics, 1988
Eisenberg JM. New drugs and clinical economics: analysis of cost-effectiveness in the assessment of pharmaceutical innovations. Review of Infectious Diseases 6 (Suppl. 4): S905–S908, 1984
Eisenberg JM. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. In Cebul & Beck (Eds) Teaching clinical decision making, pp. 97–114, Praeger Publishers, New York, 1985
Eisenberg JM. Clinical economics: a guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. Journal of the American Medical Association 262: 2879–2886, 1989
Eisenberg JM, Koffer H, Glick HA, Connell ML, Loss LE, et al. What is the cost of nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycosides? Annals of Internal Medicine 107: 900–909, 1987
Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Annals of Internal Medicine 96: 102–109, 1982
Eisenberg JM, Koffer H, Glick HA, Connell ML, Loss LE, et al. What is the cost of nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycosides? Annals of Internal Medicine 107: 900–909, 1987
Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Annals of Internal Medicine 96: 102–109, 1982
Henry D. Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions: the development of Australian guidelines for Pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics 1: 54–67, 1992
Hillman AL, Bloom BS. Economic effects of prophylactic use of misoprostol to prevent gastric ulcer in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Archives of Internal Medicine 149: 2061–2065, 1989
Hillman AL, Eisenberg JM, Pauly MV, Bloom BS, Glick H, et al. Sounding board: avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 1362–1365, 1991
Hillman AL, Bloom BS. Economic effects of prophylactic use of misoprostol to prevent gastric ulcer in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Archives of Internal Medicine 149: 2061–2065, 1989
Hillman AL, Eisenberg JM, Pauly MV, Bloom BS, Glick H, et al. Sounding board: avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 1362–1365, 1991
Hillman BJ, Kahan JP, Neu CR, Hammons GT. Clinical trials to evaluate cost-effectiveness. Investigative Radiology 24: 167–171, 1989
Houts PS, Lipton A, Harvey HA, Martin B, Simmonds MA, et al. Nonmedical costs to patients and their families associated with outpatient chemotherapy. Cancer 53: 2388–2392, 1984
Hurst JW. Reforming health care in seven European nations. Health Affairs, Millwood, 1991
Johnson KF. Developing a cost base for pricing. Topics in Health Care Finances 14: 16–25, 1987a
Johnson KF. Case study: procedure cost determination. Topics in Health Care Finances 14: 7–87, 1987b
Leaf A. Sounding board: cost effectiveness as a criterion for Medicare coverage. New England Journal of Medicine 321: 898–900, 1989
Simpson CA, Souney PF. Calculating costs of drug therapy: a review of a decade of literature (1977–1987). Clinical Therapeutics 10: 616–650, 1988
Strom BL. Pharmacoepidemiology, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1989
Warner KE, Luce BR. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care: principles, practice and potential. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, 1982
Weinstein MC. Economic assessments of medical practices and technologies. Medical Decision Making 1: 309, 1981
Wharton M, Cochi SL, Hutcheson RH, Bistowish JM, Schaffner W. A large outbreak of mumps in the postvaccine era. Journal of Infectious Diseases 158: 1253–1260, 1988
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Copley-Merriman, C., Egbuonu-Davis, L., Kotsanos, J.G. et al. Clinical Economics. Pharmacoeconomics 1, 370–376 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199201050-00008
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199201050-00008