Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Potency and Dissolution Performance of Internationally Available Piroxicam Products

  • Potency and Dissolution of Piroxicam Products
  • Pharmaco Economics
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Generic drug products are marketed throughout the world and are generally regarded as being equivalent to the name brand product. Piroxicam is a widely prescribed nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug and is marketed under the Pfizer tradename Feldene® or Felden®. In countries with no patent laws or where the Feldene® patent has expired, the drug is available under various trademarks by many different producers. Differences in formulations produced by different manufacturers can be assessed by measuring dissolution rate and potency. In this study, the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) dissolution and potency tests were applied to 85 generic piroxicam products obtained from 21 countries in an attempt to evaluate if the available formulations met standard quality assurance tests. The results show that of the 85 piroxicam products tested, 17 products met the USP dissolution standards and 68 products failed. Of the 85 products tested for potency as a percentage of label claim, 50 products failed the USP criteria. Overall, 91% of the generic piroxicam products evaluated failed to meet the routine in vitro USP quality assurance criteria for potency and/or dissolution. The substantial differences observed in this study regarding performance of piroxicam dosage forms available worldwide have possible implications in terms of product equivalency and standards at an international level. While these results cannot be used to draw clinical conclusions without bioavailability data, they should nonetheless be kept in mind by healthcare practitioners. These data should be evaluated along with other relevant considerations before physicians and pharmacists make decisions regarding the interchange of these products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barone JA, Colaizzi JL, Zorn BK. The generic drug scandal and its implications for pharmacy professionals. DICP: Annals of Pharmacotherapy 24: 98–99, 1990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barone JA, Lordi NG, Byerly WG, Colaizzi JL. Comparative dissolution performance of internationally available piroxicam products. Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy 22: 35–40, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byerly WG, Barone JA, Kopcha M, Colaizzi JL, Deeter RG. Comparison of dissolution and potency of internationally available piroxicam: generic variability. Journal of International Postgraduate Medicine 3: 4–10, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll NY, Wolfgang AP. Research in brief: inherent risk and market acceptance of generic drug products. Journal of Health Care and Marketing 9: 48–51, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monograph for Piroxicam Capsules. In United States Pharmacopeial Convention. The United States Pharmacopeia, 21st revision. Rockville MD: US Pharmacopeial Convention (Suppl. 2): 1880, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Physical Tests and Determinations: Dissolution. In United States Pharmacopeial Convention. The United States Pharmacopeia, 21st revision, Rockville, MD: US Pharmacopeial Convention 1985: 1243–1244, 1985a

    Google Scholar 

  • Physical Tests and Determinations: Dissolution. In United States Pharmacopeial Convention. The United States Pharmacopeia, 21st revision, Rockville, MD: US Pharmacopeial Convention 1985 (Suppl. 5): 2464–2465, 1985b

    Google Scholar 

  • PMA’s Joint Committee on Bioavailability. The role of dissolution testing in drug quality, bioavailability, and bioequivalence testing. Pharmaceutical Technology International 9: 62–66, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • SCRIP. The 20 top—selling drugs worldwide in 1986. In SCRIP Yearbook, 4th ed., p. 33, PJB Publications Ltd, Surrey, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah VP, Prasad VK, Alston T, et al. Phenytoin. Part I. In vitroin vivo correlations for 100mg sodium phenytoin capsules. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 72: 306–308, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Signoretti EC, Dell’Utri A, DeSena E. Dissolution characteristics of pharmaceutical equivalents. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 13: 2719–2730, 1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville J. Family physicians question process. FDA approval for generics rapped. American Medical News 13: 4–5, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarbrick J. In vitro models of drug dissolution. In Swarbrick J (Ed.) Current concepts in the pharmaceutical sciences: biopharmaceutics, pp. 265–296, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JG. Biopharmaceutics: absorption aspects. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 50: 359–387, 1961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JG. Biopharmaceutics and relevant pharmacokinetics. In Hamilton IL (Ed.) Drug intelligence publications, 1st ed., pp. 98–103, 110-124, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Yau MKT, Meyer ME. In vivo—in vitro correlations with the Sartorius dissolution simulator I: methenamine, nitrofurantoin and chlorthiazide. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 70: 1017–1024, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yau MKT, Meyer MC. In vivo—in vitro correlations with the Sartorius dissolution simulator II: papaverine, phenytoin and sulfisoxazole. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 72: 681–686, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer WA. Generic drug products. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 46: 2005, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barone, J.A. Comparative Potency and Dissolution Performance of Internationally Available Piroxicam Products. Pharmacoeconomics 1 (Suppl 1), 49–52 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199200011-00012

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199200011-00012

Keywords

Navigation