Accumulated versus Continuous Exercise for Health Benefit
- 1.1k Downloads
Current physical activity guidelines endorse the notion that the recommended amount of daily physical activity can be accumulated in short bouts performed over the course of a day. Although intuitively appealing, the evidence for the efficacy of accumulated exercise is not plentiful. The purpose of this review was to compare the effects of similar amounts of exercise performed in either one continuous or two or more accumulated bouts on a range of health outcomes.
Sixteen studies met the selection criteria for inclusion in the review, in which at least one outcome known to affect health was measured before and after continuous and accumulated exercise training interventions. Where improvements in cardiovascular fitness were noted, most studies reported no difference in the alterations between accumulated and continuous patterns of exercise. In the few studies where a normalization of blood pressure was observed from baseline to post-intervention, there appear to be no differences between accumulated and continuous exercise in the magnitude of this effect. For other health outcomes such as adiposity, blood lipids and psychological well-being, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether accumulated exercise is as effective as the more traditional continuous approach.
Seven short-term studies in which at least one health-related outcome was measured during the 0- to 48-hour period after a single continuous bout of exercise and a number of short bouts of equivalent total duration were included in the review. Many of the studies of such short-term effects considered the plasma triglyceride response to a meal following either accumulated short or continuous bouts of exercise. Collectively, these studies suggest that accumulated exercise may be as effective at reducing postprandial lipaemia. Further research is required to determine if even shorter bouts of accumulated exercise (<10 minutes) confer a health benefit and whether an accumulated approach to physical activity increases adherence among the sedentary population at whom this pattern of exercise is targeted.
KeywordsPhysical Activity Exercise Intervention Exercise Group Exercise Bout Training Study
No funding was received for the preparation of this article and the authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to its contents.
- 2.Trost S, Owen N, Bauman A, et al. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 34(12): 1996–2001Google Scholar
- 3.Ebisu T. Splitting the distance of endurance running: on cardiovascular endurance and blood lipids. Jpn J Phys Educ 1985; 30(1): 37–43Google Scholar
- 14.Murphy M. Lifestyle activities for health. In: Borms E, Oja P, editors. Health enhancing physical activity: International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer, 2004Google Scholar
- 24.Jakicic JM, Wing RR, Butler BA, et al. Prescribing exercise in multiple short bouts versus one continuous bout: effects on adherence, cardiorespiratory fitness, and weight loss in overweight women. Int J Obesity 1995; 19: 893–901Google Scholar
- 33.Campbell S, Moffatt R, Kushnick M, et al. Acute bouts of continuous and accumulated tread mill exercise of isocaloric energy expenditure alters HDL-C2 and LCATa in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39(5): S464Google Scholar
- 35.Mestek ML, Garner JC, Plaisance EP, et al. Blood lipid responses after continuous and accumulated aerobic exercise. Int J Sports Nutr Exerc Metab 2006; 16: 245–54Google Scholar
- 39.Health DO. Physical activity health improvement and prevention: at least 5 a week — a report from the Chief Medical Officer. London: HM Stationery Office, 2004Google Scholar
- 43.Pescatello L, Franklin B, Fagard R, et al. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 46: 533–53Google Scholar
- 48.Kennedy RA, Boreham CAG, Murphy MH, et al. Evaluating the effects of a low volume stairclimbing programme on measures of health-related fitness in sedentary office workers. J Sport Sci Med 2007; 6: 448–54Google Scholar