Sports Medicine

, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp 561–569 | Cite as

How does Exercise Affect Bone Development during Growth?

  • German Vicente-RodríguezEmail author
Review Article


It is increasingly accepted that osteoporosis is a paediatric issue. The prepubertal human skeleton is quite sensitive to the mechanical stimulation elicited by physical activity. To achieve the benefits for bone deriving from physical activity, it is not necessary to perform high volumes of exercise, since a notable osteogenic effect may be achieved with just 3 hours of participation in sports. Physical activity or participation in sport should start at prepubertal ages and should be maintained through the pubertal development to obtain the maximal peak bone mass potentially achievable. Starting physical activity prior to the pubertal growth spurt stimulates both bone and skeletal muscle hypertrophy to a greater degree than observed with normal growth in non-physically active children. High strain-eliciting sport like gymnastics, or participation in sports or weight-bearing physical activities like football or handball, are strongly recommended to increase the peak bone mass. Moreover, the increase in lean mass is the most important predictor for bone mineral mass accrual during prepubertal growth throughout the population. Since skeletal muscle is the primary component of lean mass, participation in sport could have not only a direct osteogenic effect, but also an indirect effect by increasing muscle mass and hence the tensions generated on bones during prepubertal years.


Bone Mineral Density Bone Mass Bone Mineral Content Lean Mass Sport Participation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The study was supported by Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (AP2000-3652), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Gobierno de Canarias (PI2000/067), Consejo Superior de Deportes (27/UNI10/00) and Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (BFI2003-09638 and FEDER). The authors thank José Navarro de Tuero for his excellent technical assistance. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, et al. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1137–1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dent CE. Keynote address: problems in metabolic bone disease. In: Frame B, Parfitt AM, Duncan H, editors. International symposium on clinical aspects of metabolic bone disease. Detroit (MI): Henry Ford Hospital, 1972: 1–7Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonjour JP, Chevalley T, Ammann P, et al. Gain in bone mineral mass in prepubertal girls 3.5 years after discontinuation of calcium supplementation: a follow-up study. Lancet 2001; 358: 1208–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    See man E. An exercise in geometry. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, et al. A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1672–1679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization. Statement by Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, Director-General of the World Health Organization on World Health Day, 7 April 2002 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2006 May 26]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nordstrom A, Karlsson C, Nyquist F, et al. Bone loss and fracture risk after reduced physical activity. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 202–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andersen RE, Crespo CJ, Barflett SJ, et al. Relationship of physical activity and television watching with body weight and level of fatness among children: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 1998; 279 (12): 938–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woodring BC. Relationship of physical activity and television watching with body weight and level of fatness among children: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Child Fam Nurs 1998; 1 (2): 78–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lindquist CH, Reynolds KD, Goran MI. Sociocultural determinants of physical activity among children. Prev Med 1999; 29: 305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bass S, Pearce G, Bradney M, et al. Exercise before puberty may confer residual benefits in bone density in adulthood: studies in active prepubertal and retired female gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, et al. Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: a controlled prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 1814–1821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, et al. Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haapasalo H, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al. Effect of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density of female junior tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 310–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, et al. Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 2281–2289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Calbet JA, Dorado C, Diaz-Herrera P, et al. High femoral bone mineral content and density in male football (soccer) players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1682–1687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vicente-Rodriguez G, Jimenez-Ramirez J, Ara I, et al. Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in prepubescent footballers. Bone 2003; 33: 853–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bailey DA, Martin AD, McKay HA, et al. Calcium accretion in girls and boys during puberty: a longitudinal analysis. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 2245–2250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gustavsson A, Thorsen K, Nordstrom P. A 3-year longitudinal study of the effect of physical activity on the accrual of bone mineral density in healthy adolescent males. Calcif Tissue Int 2003; 73: 108–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vicente-Rodriguez G, Ara I, Perez-Gomez J, et al. Muscular development and physical activity are major determinate of femoral bone mass acquisition during growth. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 611–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Doyle F, Brown J, Lachance C. Relation between bone mass and muscle weight. Lancet 1970; I: 391–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferretti JL, Cointry GR, Capozza RF, et al. Bone mass, bone strength, muscle-bone interactions, osteopenias and osteo-poroses. Mech Ageing Dev 2003; 124: 269–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reid IR, Ames R, Evans MC, et al. Determinants of total body and regional bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women: a key role for fat mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992; 75: 45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lohman T, Going S, Pamenter R, et al. Effects of resistance training on regional and total bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a randomized prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 1015–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faulkner RA, Bailey DA, Drinkwater DT, et al. Regional and total body bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and total body tissue composition in children 8-16 years of age. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53: 7–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pietrobelli A, Faith MS, Wang J, et al. Association of lean tissue and fat mass with bone mineral content in children and adolescents. Obes Res 2002; 10: 56–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rauch F, Bailey DA, Baxter-Jones A, et al. The ‘muscle-bone unit’ during the pubertal growth spurt. Bone 2004; 34: 771–775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Frost HM. Muscle, bone, and the Utah paradigm: a 1999 overview. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 911–917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramsay JA, Blimkie CJR, Smith K, et al. Strength training effects in prepubescent boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 605–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vicente-Rodriguez G, Dorado C, Ara I, et al. Artistic versus rhythmic gymnastics: effects on bone and muscle mass in young girls. Int J Sports Med. In pressGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vicente-Rodriguez G, Ara I, Perez-Gomez J, et al. High femoral bone mineral density accretion in prepuberal football players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 33: 1789–1795Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krisman-Scott MA, Buzby M, Weill V, et al. Working with adolescents: a time of opportunity [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2006 May 26]Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2004Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cameron N, Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. A longitudinal analysis of the growth of limb segments in adolescence. Ann Hum Biol 1982; 9: 211–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tanner JM. Foetus into man: physical growth from conception to maturity. Rev. ed. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1990Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Seeman E. Clinical review 137: sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 4576–4584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Molgaard C, Thomsen BL, Prentice A, et al. Whole body bone mineral content in healthy children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76: 9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang XZ, Kalu DN, Erbas B, et al. The effects of gonadectomy on bone size, mass, and volumetric density in growing rats are gender-, site-, and growth hormone-specific. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 802–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lu PW, Briody IN, Ogle GD, et al. Bone mineral density of total body, spine, and femoral neck in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1451–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schoenau E. The development of the skeletal system in children and the influence of muscle strength. Horm Res 1989; 49: 27–31Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schoenau E, Neu CM, Rauch F, et al. The development of bone strength at the proximal radius during childhood and adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 613–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, McKay HA. Growth, physical activity, and bone mineral acquisition. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1996; 24: 233–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, et al. Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 352–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ilich JZ, Skugor M, Hangartner T, et al. Relation of nutrition, body composition and physical activity to skeletal development: a cross-sectional study in preadolescent females. J Am Coll Nutr 1998; 17: 136–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Slemenda CW, Reister TK, Hui SL, et al. Influences on skeletal mineralization in children and adolescents: evidence for varying effects of sexual maturation and physical activity. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 201–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jiménez Ramírez J, Lopez Calbet JA. Influencia de la actividad fisica extraescolar en la masa osea durante el crecimiento. Rev Entrenamiento Deportivo 2001; 15: 37–42Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lima F, De Falco V, Baima J, et al. Effect of impact load and active load on bone metabolism and body composition of adolescent athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1318–1323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Irjala K, et al. A 1-year prospective study on the relationship between physical activity, markers of bone metabolism, and bone acquisition in per-ipubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 3726–3732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Courteix D, Lespessailles E, Peres SL, et al. Effect of physical training on bone mineral density in prepubertal girls: a comparative study between impact-loading and non-impact-loading sports. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 152–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nurmi-Lawton JA, Baxter-Jones AD, Mirwald RL, et al. Evidence of sustained skeletal benefits from impact-loading exercise in young females: a 3-year longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 314–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morris FL, Naughton GA, Gibbs JL, et al. Prospective ten-month exercise intervention in premenarcheal girls: positive effects on bone and lean mass. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1453–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mackelvie KJ, McKay HA, Khan KM, et al. A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls. J Pediatr 2001; 139: 501–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    MacKelvie KJ, Khan KM, Petit MA, et al. A school-based exercise intervention elicits substantial bone health benefits: a 2-year randomized controlled trial in girls. Pediatrics 2003; 112: e447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    MacKelvie KJ, McKay HA, Petit MA, et al. Bone mineral response to a 7-month randomized controlled, school-based jumping intervention in 121 prepubertal boys: associations with ethnicity and body mass index. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 834–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    MacKelvie KJ, Petit MA, Khan KM, et al. Bone mass and structure are enhanced following a 2-year randomized controlled trial of exercise in prepubertal boys. Bone 2004; 34: 755–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Valdimarsson O, Linden C, Johnell O, et al. Daily physical education in the school curriculum in prepubertal girls during 1 year is followed by an increase in bone mineral accrual and bone width: data from the prospective controlled Malmo Pediatric Osteoporosis Prevention study. Calcif Tissue Int 2006; 78: 65–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gustavsson A, Olsson T, Nordstrom P. Rapid loss of bone mineral density of the femoral neck after cessation of ice hockey training: a 6-year longitudinal study in males. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 1964–1969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kannus P, et al. High -impact exercise and bones of growing girls: a 9-mo nth controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11: 1010–1017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hock JM, Centrella M, Canalis E. Insulin-like growth factor I has independent effects on bone matrix formation and cell replication. Endocrinology 1988; 122: 254–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jarvinen TL, Kannus P, Pajamaki I, et al. Estrogen deposits extra mineral into bones of female rats in puberty, but simultaneously seems to suppress the responsiveness of female skeleton to mechanical loading. Bone 2003; 32: 642–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fuchs RK, Snow CM. Gains in hip bone mass from high-impact training are maintained: a randomized controlled trial in children. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 357–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rizzoli R, Bonjour J-P. Determinants of peak bone mass and mechanisms of bone loss. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9 Suppl. 2: 17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Karlsson MK, Magnusson H, Karlsson C, et al. The duration of exercise as a regulator of bone mass. Bone 2001; 28: 128–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Heinonen A. Biomechanics. In: Khan K, McKay H, Kannus P, et al., editors. Physical activity and bone health. 1st ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2001: 23–34Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fehling PC, Alekel L, Clasey J, et al. A comparison of bone mineral densities among female athletes in impact loading and active loading sports. Bone 1995; 17: 205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Block JE, Friedlander AL, Brooks GA, et al. Determinants of bone density among athletes engaged in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing activity. J Appl Physiol 1989; 67: 1100–1105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Helge EW, Kanstrup IL. Bone density in female elite gymnasts: impact of muscle strength and sex hormones. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 174–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Cassell C, Benedict M, Specker B. Bone mineral density in elite 7- to 9-yr-old female gymnasts and swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 1243–1246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Dyson K, Blimkie CJ, Davison KS, et al. Gymnastic training and bone density in pre-adolescent females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 443–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Nickols-Richardson SM, O’Connor PJ, Shapses SA, et al. Longitudinal bone mineral density changes in female child artistic gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 994–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nickols-Richardson SM, Modlesky CM, O’Connor PJ, et al. Premenarcheal gymnasts possess higher bone mineral density than controls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 63–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bass SL, Eser P, Daly R. The effect of exercise and nutrition on the mechanostat. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2005; 5: 239–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Dorado C, Sanchis Moysi J, Vicente G, et al. Bone mass, bone mineral density and muscle mass in professional golfers. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 591–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Calbet JA, Moysi JS, Dorado C, et al. Bone mineral content and density in professional tennis players. Calcif Tissue Int 1998; 62: 491–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dorado C, Sanchis J, Vicente G, et al. Isokinetic strength and arm bone mass in postmenopausal tennis players. In: Miller S, editor. Tennis science and technology. London: International Tennis Federation, 2003: 237–243Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Boskey AL. Mineralization, structure, and function of bone. In: Seibel MJ, Robins SP, Bilezikian JP, editors. Dynamics of bone and cartilage metabolism. San Diego (CA): Academic Press, 1999: 153–164Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Frost HM. Vital biomechanics: proposed general concepts for skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage. Calcif Tissue Int 1988; 42: 145–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Schoenau E, Frost HM. The ‘muscle-bone unit’ in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 2002; 70: 405–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Khan K, McKay H, Kannus P, et al. Physical activity and bone health. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2001Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Faulkner RA, Bailey DA, Drinkwater DT, et al. Bone densitometry in Canadian children 8–17 years of age. Calcif Tissue Int 1996; 59: 344–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kim J, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB, et al. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by a new dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry method. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 378–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Cointry GR, et al. Gender-related differences in the relationship between densitometric values of whole-body bone mineral content and lean body mass in humans between 2 and 87 years of age. Bone 1998; 22: 683–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Young D, Hopper JL, Nowson CA, et al. Determinants of bone mass in 10- to 26-year-old females: a twin study. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 558–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Vicente-Rodriguez G, Dorado C, Perez-Gomez J, et al. Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in young female handball players. Bone 2004; 35: 1208–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Daly RM, Saxon L, Turner CH, et al. The relationship between muscle size and bone geometry during growth and in response to exercise. Bone 2004; 34: 281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Young D, Hopper JL, Macinnis RJ, et al. Changes in body composition as determinants of longitudinal changes in bone mineral measures in 8 to 26-year-old female twins. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12: 506–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Forwood MR, Bailey DA, Beck TJ, et al. Sexual dimorphism of the femoral neck during the adolescent growth spurt: a structural analysis. Bone 2004; 35: 973–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Parfitt AM. The attainment of peak bone mass: what is the relationship between muscle growth and bone growth? Bone 2004; 34: 767–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical EducationUniversity of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaCanary IslandSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Health and Sport ScienceUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations