In general, elite climbers have been characterised as small in stature, with low percentage body fat and body mass. Currently, there are mixed conclusions surrounding body mass and composition, potentially because of variable subject ability, method of assessment and calculation. Muscular strength and endurance in rock climbers have been primarily measured on the forearm, hand and fingers via dynamometry. When absolute hand strength was assessed, there was little difference between climbers and the general population. When expressed in relation to body mass, elite-level climbers scored significantly higher, highlighting the potential importance of low body mass.
Rock climbing is characterised by repeated bouts of isometric contractions. Hand grip endurance has been measured by both repeated isometric contractions and sustained contractions, at a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction. Exercise times to fatigue during repeated isometric contractions have been found to be significantly better in climbers when compared with sedentary individuals. However, during sustained contractions until exhaustion, climbers did not differ from the normal population, emphasising the importance of the ability to perform repeated isometric forearm contractions without fatigue becoming detrimental to performance.
A decrease in handgrip strength and endurance has been related to an increase in blood lactate, with lactate levels increasing with the angle of climbing. Active recovery has been shown to provide a better rate of recovery and allows the body to return to its pre-exercised state quicker. It could be suggested that an increased ability to tolerate and remove lactic acid during climbing may be beneficial.
Because of increased demand placed upon the upper body during climbing of increased difficulty, possessing greater strength and endurance in the arms and shoulders could be advantageous.
Flexibility has not been identified as a necessary determinant of climbing success, although climbing-specific flexibility could be valuable to climbing performance.
As the difficulty of climbing increases, so does oxygen uptake (V̇O2), energy expenditure and heart rate per metre of climb, with a disproportionate rise in heart rate compared with V̇O2. It was suggested that these may be due to a metaboreflex causing a sympathetically mediated pressor response. In addition, climbers had an attenuated blood pressure response to isometric handgrip exercises when compared with non-climbers, potentially because of reduced metabolite build-up causing less stimulation of the muscle metaboreflex.
Training has been emphasised as an important component in climbing success, although there is little literature reviewing the influence of specific training components upon climbing performance.
In summary, it appears that success in climbing is not related to individual physiological variables but is the result of a complex interaction of physiological and psychological factors.
KeywordsMaximum Voluntary Contraction Blood Lactate Handgrip Strength Rock Climbing Body Mass Ratio
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.
- 3.Rockfax. Grade conversion table [online]. Available from URL: http://www.rockfax.com/publications/grades.html [Accessed 2006 Apr 12]Google Scholar
- 13.Corbin C, Lindsey R, Welk G. Concepts of physical fitness: active lifestyle for wellness. Boston (MA): Mcgraw Hill, 2000Google Scholar
- 15.Gresham N. Neil Gresham’s guide to campus boarding [online]. Available from URL: http://www.planetfear.com/ar-ticle_detail.asp?a_id=206 [Accessed 2006 May 10]Google Scholar
- 16.Sinoway LI, Musch TI, Minotti JR, et al. Enhanced maximal metabolic vasodilation in the dominant forearms of tennis players. J Appl Physiol 1986; 61: 108–115Google Scholar
- 17.McArdle W, Katch F, Kateh V. Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition and human performance. 5th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001Google Scholar
- 18.Birkett B. Techniques in modern rock and ice climbing. London: ANC Black, 1988Google Scholar
- 21.Farrell PA, Wilmore JH, Coyle FF, et al. Plasma lactate accumulation and distance running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1979; 11: 338–344Google Scholar
- 24.Janot JM, Steffen JP, Porcari JP, et al. Heart rate responses and perceived exertion for beginner and recreational sport climbers during indoor climbing. J Exerc Physiol 2000; 3 (1): 1–7Google Scholar
- 25.Hardy L, Martindale K. Some physiological parameters in rock climbing. Phys Educ Rev 1982; 5: 41–44Google Scholar
- 26.Wescott W. Fitness benefits of rock climbing. Am Fitness Q 1992; 10: 28–31Google Scholar