Sports Medicine

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 451–459 | Cite as

Iliotibial Band Syndrome in Runners

Innovations in Treatment
  • Michael Fredericson
  • Chuck Wolf
Injury Clinic

Abstract

Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is the most common cause of lateral knee pain in runners. It is an overuse injury that results from repetitive friction of the iliotibial band (ITB) over the lateral femoral epicondyle, with biomechanical studies demonstrating a maximal zone of impingement at approximately 30° of knee flexion. Training factors related to this injury include excessive running in the same direction on a track, greater-than-normal weekly mileage and downhill running. Studies have also demonstrated that weakness or inhibition of the lateral gluteal muscles is a causative factor in this injury. When these muscles do not fire properly throughout the support phase of the running cycle, there is a decreased ability to stabilise the pelvis and eccentrically control femoral abduction. As a result, other muscles must compensate, often leading to excessive soft tissue tightness and myofascial restrictions. Initial treatment should focus on activity modification, therapeutic modalities to decrease local inflammation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and in severe cases, a corticosteroid injection. Stretching exercises can be started once acute inflammation is under control. Identifying and eliminating myofascial restrictions complement the therapy programme and should precede strengthening and muscle re-education. Strengthening exercises should emphasise eccentric muscle contractions, triplanar motions and integrated movement patterns. With this comprehensive treatment approach, most patients will fully recover by 6 weeks. Interestingly, biomechanical studies have shown that faster-paced running is less likely to aggravate ITBS and faster strides are initially recommended over a slower jogging pace. Over time, gradual increases in distance and frequency are permitted. In the rare refractory case, surgery may be required. The most common procedure is releasing or lengthening the posterior aspect of the ITB at the location of peak tension over the lateral femoral condyle.

References

  1. 1.
    Barber FA, Sutker AN. Iliotibial band syndrome. Sports Med 1992; 14 (2): 144–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clement DB, Taunton JE, Smart GW, et al. A survey of overuse running injuries. Phys Sportsmed 1981; 9 (5): 47–58Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linderburg G, Pinshaw R, Noakes TD. Iliotibial band syndrome in runners. Phys Sportsmed 1984; 12 (5): 118–30Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noble CA. Iliotibial band friction syndrome in runners. Am J Sports Med 1980 Jul-Aug; 8 (4): 232–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evans P. The postural function of the iliotibial tract. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1979 Jul; 61 (4): 271–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orchard JW, Fricker PA, Abud AT, et al. Biomechanics of iliotibial band friction syndrome in runners. Am J Sports Med 1996 May-Jun; 24 (3): 375–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Terry GC, Hughston JC, Norwood LA. The anatomy of the iliopatellar band and iliotibial tract. Am J Sports Med 1986 Jan-Feb; 14 (1): 39–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martens M, Libbrecht P, Burssens A. Surgical treatment of iliotibial band friction syndrome. Am J Sports Med 1989 Sep-Oct; 17 (5): 651–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gottschalk F, Kourosh S, Leveau B. The functional anatomy of tensor fascia latae and gluteus medius and minimus. J Anat 1989 Oct; 166: 179–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Messier SP, Edwards DG, Martin DF, et al. Etiology of iliotibial band friction syndrome in distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995 Jul; 27 (7): 951–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fredericson M, Cookingham CL, Chaudhari AM, et al. Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 2000 Jul; 10 (3): 169–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacMahon JM, Chaudhari AM, Adriacchi TP. Biomechanical injury predictors for marathon runners: striding towards iliotibial band syndrome injury prevention [abstract]. Hong Kong: International Society of Biomechanics, 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwellnus MP. Lower limb biomechanics in runners with the iliotibial band friction syndrome, abstracted. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25 (5): S68Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1999Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fredericson M, Guillet M, DeBenedictis L. Quick solutions for iliotibial band syndrome. Phys Sportsmed 2000; 28: 52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: testing and function. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1993Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janda V. Muscle function testing. London: Butterworths, 1983Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gray G. Total body functional profile. Adrian (MI): Wynn Marketing, 2001Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nishimura G, Yamato M, Tamai K, et al. MR findings in iliotibial band syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 1997 Sep; 26 (9): 533–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolf C. IDEA. Personal Trainer Magazine 2002; Jul–Aug: 20–31Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fredericson M, White JJ, MacMahon JM, et al. Quantitative analysis of the relative effectiveness of 3 iliotibial band stretches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 May; 83 (5): 589–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richards DP, Barber FA, Troop RL. Iliotibial band Z-lengthening. Arthroscopy 2003 Mar; 19 (3): 326–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Fredericson
    • 1
  • Chuck Wolf
    • 2
  1. 1.Stanford University School of Medicine, and Stanford University Cross-Country and Track TeamsStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Human Motion AssociatesGothaUSA

Personalised recommendations