Skip to main content

Modelling Human Locomotion

Applications to Cycling

Sports Medicine volume 31, pages 497–509 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

Mathematical models of performance in locomotor sports are reducible to functions of the sort y = f(x) where y is some performance variable, such as time, distance or speed, and x is a combination of predictor variables which may include expressions for power (or energy) supply and/or demand. The most valid and useful models are first-principles models that equate expressions for power supply and power demand. Power demand in cycling is the sum of the power required to overcome air resistance and rolling resistance, the power required to change the kinetic energy of the system, and the power required to ride up or down a grade. Power supply is drawn from aerobic and anaerobic sources, and modellers must consider not only the rate but also the kinetics and pattern of power supply. The relative contributions of air resistance to total demand, and of aerobic energy to total supply, increase curvilinearly with performance time, while the importance of other factors decreases. Factors such as crosswinds, aerodynamic accessories and drafting can modify the power demand in cycling, while body configuration/ orientation and altitude will affect both power demand and power supply, often in opposite directions.

Mathematical models have been used to solve specific problems in cycling, such as the chance of success of a breakaway, the optimal altitude for performance, creating a ‘level playing field’ to compare performances for selection purposes, and to quantify, in the common currency of minutes and seconds, the effects on performance of changes in physiological, environmental and equipment variables. The development of crank dynamometers and portable gas-analysis systems, combined with a modelling approach, will in the future provide valuable information on the effect of changes in equipment, configuration and environment on both supply and demand-side variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

49,54 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Table I
Table II
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Lloyd BB. The energetics of running: an analysis of world records. Adv Sci 1966; 22: 515–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miserocchi G, Confalonieri F, Lorenzi M. Mathematical modeling of competitive swimming. J Swim Res 1990; 6: 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Péronnet F, Thibault G. Analyse physiologique de la performance en course à pied: révision du modèle hyperbolique. J Physiol Paris 1987; 80: 52–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morton RH. The supreme runner: a theory of running and some of his physiological attributes. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1984; 16 (2): 26–8

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morton RH. Mathematical representation of the velocity curve of sprint running. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985; 10: 166–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Secher NH, Vaage O. Rowing performance, a mathematical model based on analysis of body dimensions as exemplified by body weight. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983; 52: 88–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mognoni P, Lafortuna C, Russo G, et al. An analysis of world records in three types of locomotion. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982; 49: 287–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams WC. Influence of age, sex, and body weight on the energy expenditure of bicycle riding. J Appl Physiol 1967: 22: 539–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bale P, Bradbury D, Colley E. Anthropometric and training variables related to 10 km running performance. Br J Sports Med 1986; 20: 170–3

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coyle EF, Feltner ME, Kautz SA, et al. Physiological and biomechanical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  11. Craig NP, Conyers RAJ. Physiological and biochemical correlates of a 40 km individual cycling time trial [abstract]. In: Torode M, editor. Proceedings of the Australian Sports Medicine Federation (ASMF) National Scientific Conference; 1988 Oct 6–8; Sydney. Canberra: ASMF, 1988: 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  12. Craig NP, Norton KI, Squires B, et al. Aerobic and anaerobic indices contributing to track endurance cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993: 67: 150–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dengel DR, Flynn MG, Costill D, et al. Determinants of success during triathlon competition. Res Q Exerc Sport 1989; 60 (3): 234–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krebs PS, Zinkgraf S, Virgilio SJ. Predicting competitive bicycling performance with training and physiological variables. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1986; 26: 323–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller FR, Manfredi TG. Physiological and anthropometrical predictors of 15 km time-trial performance. Res Q 1987; 58: 250–4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olds TS, Norton KI, Craig NP. Mathematical model of cycling performance. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75: 730–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Olds TS, Norton KI, Lowe ELA, et al. Modeling road-cycling performance. J Appl Physiol 1995; 78: 1596–611

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeiffer RP, Harder BP, Landis D, et al. Correlating indices of arobic capacity with performance in elite women road cyclists. J Strength Condit Res 1993; 7: 201–5

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kyle CR. Reduction of wind resistance and power output of racing cyclists and runners travelling in groups. Ergonomics 1979; 22: 387–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kyle CR. Mechanics and aerodynamics of cycling. In: Burke ER, Newsom MM, editors. Medical and scientific aspects of cycling. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988: 235–51

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kyle CR. Energy and aerodynamics in bicycling. Clin Sports Med 1994; 13 (1): 39–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. White AP. Factors affecting speed in human-powered vehicles. J Sports Sci 1993; 12: 419–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Behncke H. Optimization models for the force and energy in competitive sports. Math Meth Appl Sci 1987; 9: 298–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kenney WL, Hodgson JL. Variables predictive of performance in elite middle-distance runners. Br J Sports Med 1985; 19: 207–9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Péronnet F, Thibault G. Mathematical analysis of running performance and world running records. J Appl Physiol 1989; 67: 453–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Capelli C, Rosa G, Butti F, et al. Energy cost and efficiency of riding aerodynamic bicycles. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993; 67: 144–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davies, CTM. Effect of air resistance on the metabolic cost and performance of cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 1980; 45: 245–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. de Groot G, Sargeant A, Geysel J. Air friction and rolling resistance during cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1090–5

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. di Prampero PE, Cortili G, Mognoni P, et al. Equation of motion of a cyclist. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 201–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kyle CR. The aerodynamics of handlebars and helmets. Cycling Sci 1989; 2 (1): 22–5

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kyle CR, Burke ER. Improving the racing bicycle. Mech Eng 1984 Sep: 34–45

  32. Nonweiler T. Power output of racing cyclists. Engineering 1957 May: 586

  33. Pugh LGCE. The relation of oxygen intake and speed in competition cycling and comparative observations on the bicycle ergometer. J Physiol 1974; 241: 795–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Medbø JI, Mohn A-C, Tabata I, et al. Anaerobic capacity determined by maximal accumulated O2 deficit. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64: 50–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aunola S, Alanen E, Marniemi J, et al. The relation between cycling time to exhaustion and anaerobic threshold. Ergonomics 1990; 33: 1027–42

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Carnevale TJ, Gaesser GA. Effects of pedaling speed on the power-duration relationship for high-intensity exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 242–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Davies CTM, Sandstrom ER. Maximal mechanical power output and capacity of cyclists and young adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 1989: 58: 838–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gaesser GA, Carnevale TJ, Garfinkel A, et al. Estimation of critical power with nonlinear and linear models. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1430–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Léger L, Mercier D, Gauvin L. The relationship between %VȮ2max and running performance time. In: Landers DM, editor. Sport and elite performers. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1984: 113–9

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wilkie DR. Man as a source of mechanical power. Ergonomics 1960; 3: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Péronnet F, Thibault G, Rhodes E, et al. Correlation between ventilatory threshold and endurance capability in marathon runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19: 610–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. di Prampero PE, Atchou G, Brückner J-C, et al. The energetics of endurance running. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986; 55: 259–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Higgs C. Wheeling in the wind. Adapt Phys Act Q 1992; 9: 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hill AV. The air resistance to a runner. Proc R Soc Lond Series B 1927: 380–5

  45. van Ingen Schenau GJ, Cavanagh PR. Power equations in endurance sports. Biomechanics 1990; 23: 865–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kyle CR. The effect of crosswinds upon time trials. Cycling Sci 1991; 4: 51–6

    Google Scholar 

  47. Norris L. Cross wind drag: a new analysis. Bike Tech 1987; 6 (2): 14–5

    Google Scholar 

  48. McCole SD, Claney K, Conte J-C, et al. Energy expenditure during bicycling. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68: 748–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Dunn M. Free speed. Trianble 1992 Aug/Sep: 10–11

  50. Kyle CR. Athletic clothing. Sci Am 1986; 254 (3): 92–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kyle CR. The ultimate TT bike. Bicycling 1990; 31 (7): 98–100

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kyle CR. Wind tunnel tests of aero bicycles. Cycling Sci 1991; 4: 57–61

    Google Scholar 

  53. Broker JP, Kyle CR, Burke ER. Racing cyclist power requirements in the 4000-m individual and teams pursuit. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 1677–85

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hooker G, Spangler D. Scientific performance testing. Cycling Sci 1989; 1 (3): 25

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zahradnik F, Drake G. Fast decisions. Bicycling 1991; 32 (1): 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hagberg JM, McCole SD. Energy expenditure during bicycling. Cycling Sci 1990; 2 (3): 17–9

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hagberg JM, McCole SD. The effect of drafting and aerodynamic equipment on energy expenditure during cycling. Cycling Sci 1990; 2 (3): 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  58. Richardson RS, Johnson SC. The effect of aerodynamic handlebars on oxygen consumption while cycling at a constant speed. Ergonomics 1994; 37: 859–63

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Berry MJ, Pollock WE, van Nieuwenheuizen K, et al. A comparison between aero and standard racing handlebars during prolonged exercise. Int J Sports Med 1994; 15: 16–20

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Faria I, Dix C, Frazer C. Effect of body position during cycling on heart rate, pulmonary ventilation, oxygen uptake and work output. J Sports Med 1978; 18: 49–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Johnson S, Shultz B. The physiologic effects of aerodynamic handlebars. Cycling Sci 1990; 2 (4): 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  62. Origenes MM, Blank SE, Schoene RB. Exercise ventilatory response to upright and aero-posture cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 608–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ryschon T, Stray-Gundersen J. The effect of body position on the energy cost of cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 949–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Welbergen E, Clijsen LPVM. The influence of body position on maximal performance in cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 61: 138–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Ward-Smith AJ. Biophysical aerodynamics and the natural environment. New York: Wiley, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sutton JR, Reeves JT, Wagner PD, et al. Operation Everest II: oxygen transport during exercise at extreme simulated altitude. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64: 1309–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. West JB, Boyer SJ, Graber DJ, et al. Maximal exercise at extreme altitude on Mount Everest. J Appl Physiol 1983; 55: 688–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Linnarsson D, Karlsson J, Fagraeus L, et al. Muscle metabolites and oxygen deficit with exercise in hypoxia and hyperoxia. J Appl Physiol 1974; 36: 399–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Raynaud J, Martineaud JP, Bordachar J, et al. Oxygen deficit and debt in submaximal exercise at sea-level and high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1974; 22: 546–54

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dapena J, Feltner ME. Effects of wind and altitude on the times of 100-meter sprint races. Int J Sport Biomech 1987; 3: 6–39

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lloyd BB. Theoretical effects of altitude on the equation of motion of a runner. In: Margaría R, editor. Exercise at altitude. New York: Excerpta Medica, 1967: 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  72. Olds TS. The optimal altitude for cycling performance. Excel 1992; 8: 155–9

    Google Scholar 

  73. Péronnet F, Bouissou P, Perrault H, et al. The one-hour cycling record at sea-level and at altitude. Cycling Sci 1991; 3: 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  74. Péronnet F, Thibault G, Cousineau D-L. A theoretical analysis of the effect of altitude on running performance. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70: 399–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Dempsey JA, Hanson PG, Henderson KS. Exercise-induced hypoxaemia in healthy persons at sea-level. J Physiol 1984; 355: 161–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Norton KI, Squires B, Norton LH, et al. Exercise stimulus increases ventilation from maximal to supramaximal intensities. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 70: 115–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Powers SK, Martin D, Cicale M, et al. Exercise-induced hypoxaemia in athletes: role of inadequate ventilation. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 65: 37–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Powers SK, Williams J. Exercise-induced hypoxaemia in highly trained athletes. Sports Med 1987; 4: 46–53

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Lawler J, Powers SK, Thompson D. Linear relationship between VȮ2max and VȮ2max decrement during acute exposure to hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64: 1486–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Bason R, Billings CE, Fox EL, et al. Oxygen kinetics for constant work loads at various altitudes. J Appl Physiol 1973; 45: 497–500

    Google Scholar 

  81. Klausen K, Dill DB, Horvath SM. Exercise at ambient and high oxygen pressure at high altitude and at sea level. J Appl Physiol 1981; 29: 456–63

    Google Scholar 

  82. Raynaud J, Martineaud JP, Coudert J, et al. Consommation d’oxygène au repos et à l’exercice au cours de l’acclimatation à l’altitude (3,800 m) [abstract]. J Physiol Paris 1969; 61 Suppl. Pt 1: 167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Daniels JT, Oldridge N. The effects of alternate exposure to altitude and sea-level onworld-classmiddle-distance runners. Med Sci Sports 1970; 2: 107–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Martin JC, Milliken D, Cobb JE, et al. Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. J Appl Biomech 1998; 14: 276–91

    Google Scholar 

  85. Morton RH, Fitz-Clarke JR, Banister EW. Modeling human performance in running. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69: 1171–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Olds TS. The mathematics of breaking away and chasing in cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998; 77: 492–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Capelli C, di Prampero PE. Effects of altitude on top speeds during 1 h unaccompanied cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 71: 469–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Bassett DR, Kyle CR, Passfield L, et al. Comparing cycling world hour records, 1967–1996: modeling with empirical data. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 1665–76

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Bakker C, de Groot G, van Ingen Schenau GJ. Aerobic and anaerobic energy contribution in long high-intensity bicycle ergometer tests [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Biomechanics XIV Congress; 1993 Jul 4–8; Paris

  90. Foster C, Schrager M, Snyder AC, et al. Pacing strategy and athletic performance. Sports Med 1994; 17: 77–85

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. van Ingen Schenau GJ, de Koning JJ, de Groot J. The distribution of anaerobic energy in 1000 and 4000 metre cycling bouts. Int J Sports Med 1992; 13: 447–51

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Physical Education, Exercise and Sport Studies, University of South Australia, Holbrooks Rd, Underdale SA, 5032, Adelaide, Australia

    Tim Olds

Authors
  1. Tim Olds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Olds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olds, T. Modelling Human Locomotion. Sports Med 31, 497–509 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131070-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131070-00005

Keywords

  • Power Demand
  • Rolling Resistance
  • Metabolic Power
  • Modify Power Supply
  • Cycling Speed