Skip to main content

Physiological and Cardiovascular Changes Associated with Deep Water Running in the Young

Possible Implications for the Elderly

Abstract

The increased number of people taking part in deep water running (DWR) is attributable to the weight-independent characteristic of this form of exercise. Deep water runners should, however, be aware of the respiratory and cardiovascular repercussions that result from exercising in water. It has been well documented that water immersion (WI) alone results in decrements in respiratory and cardiovascular parameters in young individuals immersed in water to the neck. These decrements become more pronounced with exercise, such that maximal oxygen consumption and heart rate (HR) are lower during DWR compared with running on land. Age also seems to influence these parameters; Derion et al. found little to no change in cardiac output, stroke volume and HR during WI in older individuals compared with the decrease experienced in younger individuals. In contrast, gender appears to have no effect on WI or DWR response.

Although differences in acute metabolic responses have been observed in numerous studies, training studies examining the effectiveness of using a DWR training programme found that DWR produced equivocal training responses when compared with fit and highly trained individuals running on land. Less convincing evidence has been provided for untrained individuals seeking benefits from a DWR training programme, as some studies showed significant improvements while others did not. There is a current lack of knowledge regarding the use of this form of exercise by frail elderly individuals and/or those with osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Table I
Table II
Table III

References

  1. Frangolias DD, Rhodes EC. Metabolic responses and mechanisms during water immersion running and exercise. Sports Med 1996; 22: 38–53

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agostoni E, Gunner G, Torri G, et al. Respiratory mechanics during submersion and negative-pressure breathing. J Appl Physiol 1966; 21: 251–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Derion T, Guy HJB, Tsukimoto K, et al. Ventilation-perfusion relationships in the lung during head-out water immersion. J Appl Physiol 1992; 72: 64–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frangolias DD, Rhodes EC. Maximal and ventilatory threshold responses to treadmill and water immersion running. Med Sci Sports Exercise 1995; 27: 1007–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilder RP, Brennan DK. Physiological responses to deep water running in athletes. Sports Med 1993; 16: 374–80

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinn TJ, Sedory DR, Fisher BS. Physiological effects of deep water running following a land-based training program. Res Q Exercise Sport 1994; 65: 386–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moening D, Scheidt A, Shepardson L, et al. Biomechanical comparison of water running and treadmill running. Isokinetics Exercise Sci 1993; 3: 207–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michaud TJ, Rodriguez-Zayas J, Andres FF, et al. Comparative exercise responses of deep-water and treadmill running. J Strength Conditioning Res 1995; 9: 104–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hong SK, Cerretelli P, Cruz JC, et al. Mechanics of respiration during submersion in water. J Appl Physiol 1969; 27: 535–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Farhi LE, Linnarsson D. Cardiopulmonary readjustments during graded immersion in water at 35°C. Respir Physiol 1977; 30: 35–50

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahlback GO, Jonsson E, Liner MH. Influence of hydrostatic compression of the chest and intrathoracic blood pooling on static lung mechanics during head-out immersion. Undersea Biomed Res 1978; 5: 71–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lollgen H, Nieding GV, Horres R. Respiratory and hemodynamic adjustment during head out water immersion. Int J Sports Med 1980; 1: 25–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin YC. Circulatory functions during immersion and breathhold dives in humans. Undersea Biomed Res 1984; 11: 123–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Craig AB, Dvorak M. Thermal regulation during water immersion. J Appl Physiol 1966; 21: 1577–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McArdle WD, Magel JR, Lesmes GR, et al. Metabolic and cardiovascular adjustment to work in air and water at 18, 25, and 33°C. J Appl Physiol 1976; 40: 85–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Butts NK, Tucker M, Smith R. Maximal responses to treadmill and deep water running in high school female cross country runners. Res Q Exercise Sport 1991; 62: 236–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Butts NK, Tucker M, Greening C. Physiologic responses to maximal treadmill and deep water running in men and women. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19: 612–4

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Town GP, Bradley SS. Maximal metabolic responses of deep and shallow water running in trained runners. Med Sci Sports Exercise 1991; 23: 238–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Svedenhag J, Seger J. Running on land and in water: comparative exercise physiology. Med Sci Sports Exercise 1992; 24: 1155–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Michaud TJ, Brennan DK, Wilder RP, et al. Aquarunning and gains in cardiorespiratory fitness. J Strength Conditioning Res 1995; 9: 78–84

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glass B, Wilson D, Blessing D, et al. A physiological comparison of suspended deep water running to hard surface running. J Strength Conditioning Res 1995; 9: 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brown SP, Chitwood LF, Beason KR, et al. Deep water running physiologic responses: gender differences at treadmill-matched walking/running cadences. J Strength Conditioning Res 1997; 11: 107–14

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nakanishi Y, Kimura T, Yokoo Y Physiological responses to maximal treadmill and deep water running in the young and middle ages males. Appl Hum Sci 1999; 18: 81–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eyestone ED, Fellingham G, George J, et al. Effect of water running and cycling on maximum oxygen consumption and 2-mile run performance. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 41–4

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilber RL, Moffatt RJ, Scott BE, et al. Influence of water run training on the maintenance of aerobic performance. Med Sci Sports Exercise 1996; 28: 1056–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bushman BA, Flynn MG, Andres FF, et al. Effect of 4 wk deep water run training on running performance. Med Sci Sports Exercise 1997; 29: 694–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruoti RG, Troup JT, Berger RA. The effects of nonswimming water exercises on older adults. J Sport Phys Ther 1994; 19: 140–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taunton JE, Rhodes EC, Wolski LA, et al. Effect of land-based and water-based fitness programs on the cardiovascular fitness, strength and flexibility of women aged 65–75 years. Gerontology 1996;42: 204–10

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Posner JD, German KM, Windsor-Landsberg L, et al. Low to moderate intensity endurance training in healthy older adults: physiological responses after 4 months. J Am Geriatr See 1992; 40: 1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chu, K.S., Rhodes, E.C. Physiological and Cardiovascular Changes Associated with Deep Water Running in the Young. Sports Med 31, 33–46 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131010-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131010-00003

Keywords

  • Vital Capacity
  • Water Immersion
  • Chest Compression
  • Functional Residual Capacity
  • Maximal Heart Rate