Sports Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 105–116 | Cite as

β-Hydroxy-β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation and the Promotion of Muscle Growth and Strength

Review Article

Abstract

β-Hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB), a metabolite of the essential amino acid leucine, is one of the latest dietary supplements promoted to enhance gains in strength and lean body mass associated with resistance training. Unlike anabolic hormones that induce muscle hypertrophy by increasing muscle protein synthesis, HMB is claimed to influence strength and lean body mass by acting as an anticatabolic agent, minimising protein breakdown and damage to cells that may occur with intense exercise. Research on HMB has recently tested this hypothesis, under the assumption that it may be the active compound associated with the anticatabolic effects of leucine and its metabolites. While much of the available literature is preliminary in nature and not without methodological concern, there is support for the claims made regarding HMB supplementation, at least in young, previously untrained individuals. A mechanism by which this may occur is unknown, but research undertaken to date suggests there may be a reduction in skeletal muscle damage, although this has not been assessed directly. The response of resistance trained and older individuals to HMB administration is less clear. While the results of research conducted to date appear encouraging, caution must be taken when interpreting outcomes as most manuscripts are presented in abstract form only, not having to withstand the rigors of peer review. Of the literature reviewed relating to HMB administration during resistance training, only 2 papers are full manuscripts appearing in peer reviewed journals. The remaining 8 papers are published as abstracts only, making it difficult to critically review the research. There is clearly a need for more tightly controlled, longer duration studies to verify if HMB enhances strength and muscular hypertrophy development associated with resistance training across a range of groups, including resistance trained individuals.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely grateful to Professor Alan Hahn, Head of Department, plus Dr Peter Logan and Dr David Pyne, Senior Physiologists, Department of Physiology, Australian Institute of Sport, for their helpful criticisms and advice.

References

  1. 1.
    Sallis RE, Jones K. Dietary supplement use among college football players [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S118Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griggs RC, Kingston W, Jozefowicz RF, et al. Effect of testosterone on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66: 498–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nissen S, Panton L, Wilhelm R, et al. Effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation on strength and body composition of trained and untrained males undergoing intense resistance training [abstract]. FASEB J 1996; 10: A287Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nissen S, Panton L, Fuller Jr J, et al. Effect of feeding β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) on body composition and strength of women [abstract]. FASEB J 1997; 11: A150Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Koevering M, Nissen S. Oxidation of leucine and α-ketoisocaproate to β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate in vivo. Am J Physiol 1992; 262: E27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hong SO, Layman DK. Effects of leucine on in vitro protein synthesis and degradation in rat skeletal muscles. J Nutr 1984; 114: 1204–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    May ME, Buse MG. Effects of branch-chain amino acids on protein turnover. Diabetes Metab Rev 1989; 5: 227–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nair KS, Schwartz RG, Welle S. Leucine as a regulator of whole body and skeletal muscle protein metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol 1992; 263: E928–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sax HC, Talamini MA, Fischer JE. Clinical use of branch-chain amino acids in liver disease, sepsis, trauma and burns. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 358–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tischler ME, Desautels M, Goldberg AL. Does leucine, leucyltRNA, or some metabolite of leucine regulate protein synthesis and degradation in skeletal and cardiac muscle? J Biol Chem 1982; 257: 1613–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitch WE, Clark AS. Specificity of the effects of leucine and its metabolites on protein degradation in skeletal muscle. Biochem J 1984; 222: 579–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitch WE, Walser M, Sapir DG. Nitrogen sparing induced by leucine compared with that induced by its keto analogue, α-ketoisocaproate, in fasting obese man. J Clin Invest 1981; 67: 553–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sapir DG, Stewart PM, Walser M, et al. Effects of α-ketoisocaproate and of leucine on nitrogen metabolism in postoperative patients. Lancet 1983; I (8332): 1010–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nissen S, Sharp R, Ray M, et al. Effect of leucine metabolite beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate on muscle metabolism during resistance exercise training. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81: 2095–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vukovich MD, Stubbs NB, Bohlken RM, et al. The effect of dietary β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) on strength gains and body composition changes in older adults [abstract]. FASEB J 1997; 11: A376Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gallagher PM, Carrithers JA, Godark MP, et al. β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate supplementation during resistance training [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S402Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nissen S, Abumrad NN. Nutritional role of the leucine metabolite beta-hydroxy beta-methylbutyrate (HMB). Nutr Biochem 1997; 8: 300–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nissen S, Morrical D, Fuller Jr JC. The effects of the leucine catabolite β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) on the growth and health of growing lambs [abstract]. J Animal Sci 1994; 72 Suppl. 1: 243Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nissen S, Fuller Jr JC, Sell J, et al. The effect of beta-hydroxybeta-methylbutyrate on growth, mortality and carcass qualities of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 1994; 73: 137–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gatnau R, Zimmerman DR, Nissen SL, et al. Effect of excess dietary leucine and leucine catabolites on growth and immune response in weanling pigs. J Animal Sci 1995; 73: 159–65Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ostaszewski P, Grzelkowska K, Balasinska B, et al. Effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate and 2-oxoisocaproate on body composition and cholesterol metabolism in rabbits. VII Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition; 1995; Vale de Santarim, 162Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van Koevering MT, Dolezal HG, Gill DR, et al. Effects of betahydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate on performance and carcass quality of feedlot steers. J Animal Sci 1994; 72: 1927–35Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ostaszewski P, Papet I, Nissen S, et al. Dietary supplementation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate improves catch-up growth in underfed lambs [abstract]. Ann Zootech 1994; 43: 308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papet I, Ostaszewski P, Glomot F, et al. The effect of a high dose of 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate on protein metabolismin growing lambs. Br J Nutr 1997; 77: 885–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Talleyrand V, Zhang Z, Rathmacher J, et al. Uptake and output of the leucine metabolite β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) across the leg of pigs [abstract]. FASEB J 1993; 7: A71Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rice DE, Sharp R, Rathmacher J, et al. Role of β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) during acute exercise-induced proteolysis [abstract]. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1995; 27: S220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clarkson PM, Byrnes WC, McCormick KM, et al. Muscle soreness and serum creatine kinase activity following isometric, eccentric and concentric exercise. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 152–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fielding RA, Manfredi TJ, Ding W, et al. Acute phase response in exercise: III. Neutrophil and IL-1β accumulation in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 1993; 265: R166–72Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayward R, Ferrington DA, Kochanowski LA, et al. Effects of dietary protein on enzyme activity following exercise-induced muscle injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 414–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rennie MJ, Millward DJ. 3-methyl-histidine excretion and the urinary 3 methyl-histidine/creatinine ratio are poor indicators of skeletal muscle breakdown. Clin Sci 1983; 65: 217–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sjolin J, Stjernstrom H, Henneberg S, et al. Splanchnic and peripheral release of 3-methylhistidine in relation to its urinary excretion in human infection. Metabolism 1989; 38: 23–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rathmacher JA, Flakoll PJ, Nissen SL. A compartmental model of 3-methylhistidine metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol 1995; 269: E193–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baumgarter RN. Electrical impedance and total body electrical conductivity. In: Roche AF, Heymsfield S, Lohman TG, editors. Human body composition. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996: 79–107Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Powers ME, Arnold BA. The effects of creatine supplementation and beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation on delayed onset muscle soreness [abstract]. J Athlet Training 1999; 34: S33Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Byrd PL, Mehta PM, DeVita P, et al. Changes in muscle soreness and strength following downhill running: effects of creatine, HMB and betagen supplementation [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S265Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Panton L, Rathmacher J, Fuller J, et al. Effect of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate and resistance training on strength and functional ability in the elderly [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: S194Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yarasheski KE, Zachwieja JJ, Bier DM. Acute effects of resistance exercise on muscle protein synthesis rate in young and elderly men and women. Am J Physiol 1993; 265: E210–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Carrithers JA, Gallagher PM, Baier SM, et al. Oral ingestion of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate: effects on hematology, hepatic and renal function [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S121Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hakkinen K. Neuromuscular and hormonal adaptations during strength and power training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1989; 29: 9–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Ferrando AA, et al. Resistance training reduces the acute exercise-induced increase inmuscle protein turnover. Am J Physiol 1999; 276: E118–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Clarkson PM, Nosaka K, Braun B. Muscle function after exercise-induced muscle damage and rapid adaptation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 512–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Newham DJ, Jones DA, Clarkson PM. Repeated high-force eccentric exercise: effects onmuscle pain and damage. J Appl Physiol 1987; 63: 1381–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Faulkner JA, Brooks SV, Opiteck JA. Injury to skeletal muscle fibres during contractions: conditions of occurrence and prevention. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 911–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gibala MJ, Interisano SA, Tarnopolsky MA, et al. Myofibrillar disruption following acute resistance exercise in strength-trained athletes [abstract]. Can J Appl Physiol 1995; 20: 16PGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hakkinen K. Factors influencing trainability of muscular strength during short term and prolonged training. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1985; 7: 32–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Antonio J, Street C. Glutamine: a potentially useful supplement for athletes. Can J Appl Physiol 1999; 24: 1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lefavi RG, Anderson RA, Keith RE, et al. Efficacy of chromium supplementation in athletes: emphasis on anabolism. Int J Sport Nutr 1992; 2: 111–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kreider RB. Dietary supplements and the promotion of muscle growth with resistance exercise. Sports Med 1999; 27: 97–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tarnopolsky MA, Atkinson SA, MacDougall JD, et al. Evaluation of protein requirements for trained strength athletes. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 1986–995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lemon PWR, Tarnopolsky MA, MacDougall JD, et al. Protein requirements andmusclemass/strength changes during intensive training in novice bodybuilders. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 767–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kreider R, Ferreira M, Wilson M, et al. Effects of calcium β-HMB supplementation with or without creatine during training on body composition alterations [abstract]. FASEB J 1997; 11: A374Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Almada A, Kreider R, Ferreira M, et al. Effects of calciumβ-HMB supplementation with or without creatine during training on strength and sprint capacity [abstract]. FASEB J 1997; 11: A374Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kreider RB, Ferreira M, Wilson M, et al. Effects of calcium β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation during resistance-training on markers of catabolism, body composition and strength. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 503–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dohm GL. Protein nutrition for the athlete. Clin Sports Med 1984; 3: 595–604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Goodman MN. Amino acid and protein metabolism. In: Horton ES, Terjung RL, editors. Exercise, nutrition and energy metabolism. New York (NY): Macmillan Publishing, 1988: 89–99Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chesley A, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, et al. Changes in human muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 1383–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Houston ME. Gaining weight: the scientific basis of increasing skeletal muscle mass. Can J Appl Physiol 1999; 24: 305–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Demartino GN, Ordway GA. Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway of intracellular protein degradation: implications for muscle atrophy during unloading. In Holloszy JO, editor. Exercise and sport science reviews. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1998: 219–52Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    McDonagh MJN, Davies CTM. Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol 1984; 52: 139–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Goldberg AL, Etlinger JD, Goldspink DF, et al. Mechanism of work-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1975; 7: 185–98Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Watt PW, Kelly FJ, Goldspink DF, et al. Exercise-induced morphological and biochemical changes in skeletalmuscles of the rat. J Appl Physiol 1982; 53: 1144–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Thompson HS, Scordilis SP. Ubiquitin changes in human biceps muscle following exercise-induced damage. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1994; 204: 1193–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Belcastro AN, Shewchuk LD, Raj DA. Exercise-induced muscle injury: a calpain hypothesis. Mol Cell Biochem 1998; 179: 135–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Evans WJ, Cannon JG. The metabolic effects of exercise-induced muscle damage. In Holloszy JO, editor. Exercise and sports science reviews. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1991: 99–125Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lowe DA, Warren GL, Ingalls CP, et al. Muscle function and protein metabolism after initiation of eccentric contraction-induced injury. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79: 1260–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Fielding RA, Evans WJ. Aging and the acute phase response to exercise: implications for the role of systemic factors on skeletal muscle protein turnover. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18: S22–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Di Pasquale M. Essential amino acids. In: Wolinsky I, editor. Amino acids and proteins for the athlete. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 1997: 105–25Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chua B, Siehl DL, Morgan HE. Effect of leucine and metabolites of branched chain amino acids on protein turnover in heart. J Biol Chem 1979; 254: 8358–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schworer CM, Shiffer KA, Mortimore GE. Quantitative relationship between autophagy and proteolysis during graded amino acid deprivation in perfused rat liver. J Biol Chem 1981; 256: 7652–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Miotto G, Venerando R, Khurana KK, et al. Control of hepatic proteolysis by leucine and isovaleryl-L-carnitine through a common locus: evidence for a possible mechanism of recognition at the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem 1992; 267: 22066–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chua BHL. Specificity of leucine effect on protein degradation in perfused rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1994; 26: 743–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Côté C, Simoneau J-A, Lagassé P, et al. Isokinetic strength training protocols: do they induce skeletal muscle fibre hypertrophy? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 281–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hurley BF, Redmond RA, Pratley RE, et al. Effects of strength training on muscle hypertrophy and muscle cell disruption in older men. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16: 378–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jones DA, Rutherford OM. Human muscle strength training: the effects of three different regimes and the nature of the resultant changes. J Physiol 1987; 391: 1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Carey Smith R, Rutherford OM. The role of metabolites in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 71: 332–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Aarsland A, et al. Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: E99–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pisters PW, Pearlstone DB. Protein and amino acid metabolism in cancer cachexia: investigative techniques and therapeutic interventions. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1993; 30: 223–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cheng W, Phillips B, Abumrad N. Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate increases fatty acid oxidation by muscle cells [abstract]. FASEB J 1997; 11: A381Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cheng W, Phillips B, Abumrad N. Effect of HMB on fuel utilization, membrane stability, and creatine kinase content of cultured muscle cells [abstract]. FASEB J 1998; 12: A950Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Mourier A, Bigard AX, de Kerviler E, et al. Combined effects of caloric restriction and branched-chain amino acid supplementation on body composition and exercise performance in elite wrestlers. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18: 47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Zhang Z, Talleyrand V, Rathmacher J, et al. Change in plasma beta-hydroxy-methylbutyrate (HMB) by feeding leucine, alphaketoisocaproate (KIC) and isovaleric acid (IVA) to pigs [abstract]. FASEB J 1993; 7: A392Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Isidori A, Lo Monaco A, Cappa M. A study of growth hormone release in man after oral administration of amino acids. Curr Med Res Opin 1981; 7: 475–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    International Olympic Committee Medical Commission. Olympic movement anti-doping guide. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee, 1999Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Slater GJ, Logan PA, Boston T, et al. β-Hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation does not influence the urinary testosterone: epitestosterone ratio in healthy males. J Sci Med Sport 2000; 3: 79–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physiology, Sports Science Sports Medicine CentreAustralian Institute of SportCanberra, Australian Capital TerritoryAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Human Movement StudiesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations