Sports Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 73–78 | Cite as

The Prepubertal Years

A Uniquely Opportune Stage of Growth When the Skeleton is Most Responsive to Exercise?
Current Opinion


The growing years may be the most opportune time in life for exercise to result in large increases in bone density, enough to reduce the risk of fracture late in life. However, it is not known if there is an ‘optimal’ time during growth when the skeleton is most responsive to exercise. Comparing the osteotrophic response to exercise between pre- and peripubertal children is complex because: (i) the development of the skeleton within each stage of puberty is characterised by differing temporal patterns of growth in bone size and mass; (ii) the hormonal regulation of the skeleton is unique to each stage of puberty; and (iii) it is difficult to equate the relative mechanical load placed on the prepubertal compared with the pubertal skeleton. There are sound biological bases for the hypotheses being proposed for both the pre- and peripubertal years being the time when the skeleton is most responsive to exercise; that is, exercise may enhance bone formation in a synergistic fashion in the presence of growth hormone (prepubertal years) or sex steroids (peripubertal years). The paucity of data and the complex methodology make it difficult to draw conclusions as to the most opportune time during growth when exercise may lead to the greatest osteotrophic response. The limited data available support the notion that the prepubertal years may be the most opportune time, due to increases in bone density and periosteal expansion of cortical bone.


  1. 1.
    Parfitt MA. The two faces of growth: benefits and risks to bone integrity. Osteoporosis Int 1994; 4 (6): 382–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bass S, Myburg K. The effect of exercise on peak bone mass and bone strength. In: Warren M, Constantini N, editors. Sports endocrinology. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press Inc. In pressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bass S, Delmas PD, Pearce G, et al. The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass and density in girls is region-specific. J Clin Invest 1999; 104: 795–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, McKay HA. Growth, physical activity and bone mineral acquisition. In: Holloszy JO, editor. Exercise and sports science review. Vol. 24. American College of Sports Medicine Series. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1996: 233–66Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haapasalo H, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al. Effect of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density of female junior tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13 (2): 310–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, et al. Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bass S, Pearce G, Bradney M, et al. Exercise before puberty may confer residual benefits in bone density in adulthood: studies in active prepubertal and retired female gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13 (3): 500–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyson K, Blimkie CJR, Davison S, et al. Gymnastic training and bone density in pre-adolescent females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29 (4): 443–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daly R, Rich P, Klein R, et al. Effect of high-impact exercise on ultrasonic and biochemical indices of skeletal status: a prospective study in young male gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1222–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper C, Cawley M, Bhalla A, et al. Childhood growth, physical activity, and peak bone mass in women. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10 (6): 940–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slemenda CW, Reister TK, Hui SL, et al. Influences of skeletal mineralization in children and adolescents: evidence for varying effects of sexual maturation and physical activity. J Pediatr 1994; 125 (2): 201–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valimaki JM, Karkkainen M, Lamberg-Allardt C, et al. Exercise, smoking, and calcium intake during adolescence and early adulthood as determinants of peak bone mass. BMJ 1994; 309: 230–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Welten DC, Kemper HCG, Post GB, et al. Weight-bearing activity during youth is a more important factor for peak bone mass than calcium intake. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9 (7): 1089–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bailey D, McKay H, Mirwald RL, et al. A six year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the University of Saskatchewan Bone Mineral Accrual Study. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14 (10): 1672–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morris FL, Naughton GA, Gibbs JL, et al. Prospective ten-month exercise intervention in premenarchal girls: positive effects on bone and lean mass. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12 (9): 1453–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, et al. Differing effects of moderate exercise on bone mass, size and volumetric density in pre-pubertal boys. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13 (12): 1814–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKay H, Petit MA, Schutz RW, et al. Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density after modified physical education classes: a randomised school-based exercise intervention study in prepubescent and early pubescent children. J Pediatr 2000; 136 (2): 156–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindholm C, Hagenfeldt K, Ringertz H. Bone mineral content of young female former gymnasts. Acta Paediatr 1995; 84: 1109–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirchner EM, Lewis RD, O’Connor P. Effect of past gymnastics participation on adult bone mass. J Appl Physiol 1996; 80 (1): 226–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huddleston A, Rockwell D, Kulund DN, et al. Bone mass in lifetime tennis athletes. JAMA 1980; 244 (10): 1107–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones HH, Priest JD, Hayes WC, et al. Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59: 204–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kontulainen S, Kannus P, Haapasalo H, et al. Changes in bone mineral content with decreased training in competitive young adult tennis players and controls: a prospective 4-yr follow-up. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31 (5): 646–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duppe H, Gardsell P, Johnell O, et al. Bone mineral content in female junior, senior and former football players. Osteoporos Int 1996; 6: 437–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karlsson MK, Johnell O, Obrant KJ. Is bone mineral density advantage maintained long-term in previous weight lifters?. Calcif Tissue Int 1995; 57: 325–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karlsson MK, Hasserius R, Obrant KJ. Bone mineral density in athletes during and after career: a comparison between loaded and unloaded skeletal regions. Calcif Tissue Int 1996; 59: 245–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taaffe DR, Robinson TL, Snow CM, et al. High-impact exercise promotes bone gain in well trained female athletes. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12 (2): 255–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robinson TL, Snow-Harter C, Taaffee DR, et al. Gymnasts exhibit higher bone mass than runners despite similar prevalence of amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10 (1): 26–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blimkie CJR, Rice S, Webber CE, et al. Effects of resistance training on bone mineral content and density in adolescent females. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 74: 1025–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bouxsein ML, Marcus R. Overview of exercise and bone mass. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1994; 20: 787–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Drinkwater BL. Exercise in the prevention of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1993; 3 Suppl. 1: S169–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Forwood M, Burr D. Physical activity and bone mass: exercises in futility?. Bone Miner 1993; 21: 89–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friedlander AL, Genant HK, Sadowsky S, et al. A two-year program of aerobics and weight training enhances bone mineral density of young women. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10 (4): 574–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gleeson PB, Protas EJ, LeBlanc AD, et al. Effects of weight lifting on bone mineral density in premenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5 (2): 153–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lohman T, Going S, Pamenter R, et al. Effects of resistance training on regional and total bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a randomized prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10 (7): 1015–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rockwell JC, Sorensen AM, Baker S, et al. Weight training decreases vertebral bone density in premenopausal women: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 71 (4): 988–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snow-Harter C, Bouxsein JL, Lewis BT, et al. Effects of resistance and endurance exercise on bone mineral status of young women: a randomized exercise intervention trial. J Bone Miner Res 1992; 7 (7): 761–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kerr DA, Morton A, Dick I, et al. Exercise effects on bone mass in postmenopausal women are site specific and load-dependent. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11 (2): 218–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ. Increase in femoral bone density in young women following high-impact exercise. Osteoporos Int 1994; 4: 72–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vuori I, Heinonen A, Sievanen H, et al. Effects of unilateral strength training and detraining on bone mineral density and content in young women: a study of mechanical loading and deloading on human bones. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 55: 59–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johnston GC, Slemenda CW, Melton LJ III. Clinical use of bone densitometry. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1105-9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cumming SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fracture research group. Lancet 1993; 341: 962–3Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Faulkner KG. Bone matters: are density increases necessary to reduce fracture risk?. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15 (2): 183–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Karlberg J. A biologically-oriented mathematical model (ICP) for human growth. Acta Paediatr 1989 Suppl. 350: 70–94Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Karlberg J. On the construction of the infancy-childhood-puberty growth standard. Acta Paediatr Scand 1989 number)) Suppl. 356: 26–37Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wollmann HA, Ranke MB. GH treatment in neonates. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 398–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bourguignon JP. Linear growth as a function of age at onset of puberty and sex steroid dosage: therapeutic implications. Endoc Rev 1988; 9 (4): 467–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Buckler JM. A longitudinal study of adolescent growth. London: Springer-Verlag, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1962Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Borer KT. Exercise-induced facilitation of pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion and somatic growth. In: Laron Z, Rogal AD, editors. Hormones and sport. Vol. 55. New York (NY): Raven Press Books Ltd, 1989: 21–40Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eliakim A, Brasel JA, Mohan S, et al. Physical fitness, endurance training, and the growth hormone-insulin like growth factor I system in adolescent females. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81 (11): 3986–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rogol AD, Weltman JY, Evans WS, et al. Long-term endurance training alters the hypothalamic-pituitary axes for gonadotropins and growth hormone. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1992; 21 (4): 817–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bass S, Bradney M, Pearce G, et al. Short stature and delayed puberty in gymnasts: influence of selection bias on leg length and the duration of training on trunk length. J Paediatr 2000; 136 (2): 149–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gunnes M, Lehman EH. Physical activity and dietary constituents as predictors of forearm cortical and trabecular bone gain in healthy children and adolescents: a prospective study. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Khan KM, Green RM, Saul A, et al. Retired elite female ballet dancers and nonathletic controls have similar bone mineral density at weightbearing sites. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11 (10): 1566–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Khan KM, Bennell Kl, Hopper JL, et al. Self-report ballet classes undertaken at age 10–12 years and hip bone mineral density in later life. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7: 4–25Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Smith EL, Gilligan C. Dose-response relationship between physical loading and mechanical competence of bone. Bone 1996; 18 (1): 45–50SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ammann P, Rizzoli R, Meyer JM, et al. Bone density and shape as determinants of bone strength in IGF-I and/or pamidronate-treated ovariectomized rats. Osteoporos Int 1996; 6: 219–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ruff CB, Walker A, Trinkaus E. Postcranial robusticity in Homo: III. Ontogeny. Am J Phys Anthropol 1994; 93: 35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Garn S. The earlier gain and later loss of cortical bone. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas, 1970Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hayes WC, Gerhart TN. Biomechanics of bone: applications for assessment of bone strength. Vol. 3. In: Peck WA, editor. Bone and Mineral Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1985: 259–94Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Carter DR, van der Meulen CH, Beaupre GS. Skeletal development. Mechanical consequences of growth, aging and disease. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, editors. Osteoporosis. San Diego (CA): Academic Press Inc, 1996: 333–50Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Margulies JY, Simkin A, Leichter I, et al. Effect of intense physical activity on the bone-mineral content in the lower limbs of young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 1090–3PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bone Metabolism Research Unit, School of Health SciencesDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations