Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Home Advantage in Sport

An Overview of Studies on the Advantage of Playing at Home

Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

This review identifies the most likely causes of home advantage. The results of previous studies have identified 4 factors thought to be responsible for the home advantage. These can be categorised under the general headings of crowd, learning, travel and rule factors. From the accumulated evidence, rule factors were found to play only a minor role (in a limited number of sports) in contributing to home advantage. Studies investigating the effect of learning factors found that little benefit was to be gained from being familiar with the local conditions when playing at home. There was evidence to suggest that travel factors were responsible for part of the home advantage, provided the journey involved crossing a number of time zones. However, since high levels of home advantage are observed within countries where travel distances are not great, travel factors were not thought to be a major cause of home advantage. The evidence from studies investigating crowd factors appeared to provide the most dominant causes of home advantage.

A number of studies provide strong evidence that home advantage increases with crowd size, until the crowd reaches a certain size or consistency (a more balanced number of home and away supporters), after which a peak in home advantage is observed. Two possible mechanisms were proposed to explain these observations: either (i) the crowd is able to raise the performance of the home competitors relative to the away competitors; or (ii) the crowd is able to influence the officials to subconsciously favour the home team. The literature supports the latter to be the most important and dominant explanation. Clearly, it only takes 2 or 3 crucial decisions to go against the away team or in favour of the home team to give the side playing at home the ‘edge’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Courneya KS, Carron AV. The home advantage in sport competitions: a literature review. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1992; 14: 13–27

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke SR, Norman JM. Home ground advantage of individual clubs in English soccer. Statistician 1995; 44: 509–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nevill AM, Holder RL, Bardsley A, et al. Identifying home advantage in international tennis and golf tournaments. J Sports Sci 1997; 15: 437–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holder RL, Nevill AM. Players performance at international tournaments: is there a home advantage? J R Stat Soc 1997; 46: 551–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz B, Barsky SF. The home advantage. Soc Forces 1977; 55: 641–61

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards J. The home field advantage. In: JH Goldstein, editor. Sports, games and play: social and psychological viewpoints. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum, 1979: 409–30

    Google Scholar 

  7. Varca P. An analysis of home and away game performance of male college basketball teams. J Sport Psychol 1980; 2: 245–57

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dowie J. Why Spain should win the World Cup. New Scientist 1982; 94: 693–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Snyder EE, Purdy DA. The home advantage in collegiate basketball. Sociol Sport J 1985; 2: 352–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pollard R. Home advantage in soccer: a retrospective analysis. J Sport Sci 1986; 4: 237–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pace A, Carron AV. Travel and the home advantage. Can J Sport Sci 1992; 17: 60–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams RD, Kupper SJ. The effect of expertise on peak performance: the case of home-field advantage. J Sport Behav 1994; 17: 108–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agnew GA, Carron AV. Crowd effects and the home advantage. Int J Sport Psychol 1994; 25: 53–62

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore JC, Brylinsky J. Facility familiarity and the home advantage. J Sport Behav 1995; 18: 302–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nevill AM, Newell SM, Gale S. Factors associated with home advantage in English and Scottish soccer. J Sport Sci 1996; 14: 181–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke S. Home advantage in balanced competitions: English soccer 1991–1996. 3rd Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sports; 1996 Sep 30-Oct 2; Queensland, Australia, 111–6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baumeister RF, Steinhilber A. Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: the home field disadvantages in sports championships. J Personal Soc Psychol 1984; 47: 85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlenker BR, Phillips ST, Boniecki KA, et al. Championship pressures: choking or triumphing in one’s own territory? J Personal Soc Psychol 1995; 68: 632–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baumeister RF. Disputing the effects of championship pressures and home audiences. J Personal Soc Psychol 1995; 68: 644–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCutcheon LE. The home advantage in high school athletics. J Sport Behav 1984; 7: 135–8

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gayton WF, Langevin G. Home advantage: does it exist in individual sports? Percept Mot Skills 1992; 47: 706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bray S, Carron A. The home advantage in alpine skiing. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1993; 25: 76–81

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wright EF, Christie SD, McGuire GR, et al. The home-course disadvantage in golf championships: further evidence for the undermining effect of supportive audiences on performance under pressure. J Sport Behav 1991; 14: 51–60

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wright EF, Voyer D, Wright RD, et al. Supporting audiences and performance under pressure: the home-ice disadvantage in hockey championships. J Sport Behav 1995; 18: 21–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gayton WF, Matthews GR, Nickless CJ. The home field disadvantage in sports championships: does it exist in hockey? J Sport Psychol 1987; 9: 183–5

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kornspan AS, Lerner BS, Etzel EF, et al. The home disadvantage in the National Football League’s conference championship games. Percept Mot Skills 1995; 80: 800–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlenker BR, Phillips ST, Boniecki KA, et al. Where is the home choke? J Personal Soc Psychol 1995; 68: 649–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore JC, Brylinsky JA. Spectator effect on team performance in college basketball. J Sport Behav 1993; 16: 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thirer J, Rampey M. Effects of abusive spectator behaviour on the performance of home and visiting intercollegiate basketball teams. Percept Mot Skills 1979; 48: 1047–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Greer DL. Spectator booing and the home advantage: a study of social influence in the basketball arena. Soc Psychol Q 1983; 46: 252–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nevill A, Balmer N, Williams M. Crowd influence on decisions in association football [letter]. Lancet 1999; 353 (9162): 1416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Barnett V, Hilditch S. The effect of an artificial pitch surface on home team performance in football (soccer). J R Stat Soc 1993; 156: 39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Courneya KS, Carron AV. Effects of travel and length of home stand/road trip on the home advantage. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1991; 13: 42–9

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jehue R, Street D, Huizenga R. Effect of time zone and game time changes on team performance: National Football League. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 127–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith RS, Guilleminault C, Efron B. Circadian rhythms and enhanced athletic performance in National Football League. Sleep 1997; 20: 362–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Steenland K, Deddens JA. Effect of travel and rest on performance of professional basketball players. Sleep 1997; 20: 366–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Courneya KS, Carron AV. Batting first versus last: implications for the home advantage. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1990; 12: 312–6

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jurkovac T. Collegiate basketball players’ perceptions of the home advantage [thesis]. Bowling Green (OH): Bowling Green State University, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bar-Eli M, Tenenbaum G, Levy-Kolker N. A crisis related analysis of perceived spectator behaviour in competition. Can J Sport Sci 1992; 17: 288–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Glamser FD. Contest location, player misconduct, and race: a case from English soccer. J Sport Behav 1990; 13: 41–9

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lefebvre LM, Passer MW. The effects of game location and importance on aggression in team sport. Int J Sport Psychol 1974; 5: 102–10

    Google Scholar 

  42. Silva JM, Andrew JA. An analysis of game location and basketball performance in the Atlantic Coast Conference. Int J Sport Psychol 1987; 18: 188–204

    Google Scholar 

  43. Underwood GL, Whitwood JR. Aggression in sport: a study of an English first division soccer team. Fed Int Educ Phys Bull 1980; 50: 31–9

    Google Scholar 

  44. McGuire EJ, Courneya KS, Widmeyer WN, et al. Aggression as a potential mediator of the home advantage in professional ice hockey. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1992; 14: 148–58

    Google Scholar 

  45. Russell GW. Crowd size and density in relation to athletic aggression and performance. J Soc Behav Personal 1983; 11: 9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sumner J, Mobley M. Are cricket umpires biased? New Scientist 1981; 91: 29–31

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dennis PW, Carron AV. The relationship between game location and officiating decisions in National Hockey League officials [abstract]. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1998; 20: S63

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lehman DR, Reifman A. Spectator influence on basketball officiating. J Soc Psychol 1987; 127: 673–5

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wright CR, House T. The diamond appraised. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stefani RT. Observed betting tendencies and suggested betting strategies for European football pools. Statistician 1983; 32: 319–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Human Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET, England

    Alan M. Nevill

  2. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England

    Roger L. Holder

Authors
  1. Alan M. Nevill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger L. Holder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan M. Nevill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nevill, A.M., Holder, R.L. Home Advantage in Sport. Sports Med 28, 221–236 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199928040-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199928040-00001

Keywords

search

Navigation